Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf
sniper wrote:Thought that one should have counted. He couldn't even see the puck.
bigkam wrote:If the point of the kicking rule is to protect the players from a skate injury, then I like this call. He definitely moved his skate forward to kick it, and nearly kicked his skate up Despres' leg. If that's the purpose of the rule, then you should disallow a goal like that.
Gaucho wrote:sniper wrote:Thought that one should have counted. He couldn't even see the puck.
Irrelevant, afaik.
I don't think it's a terrible call.
farnham16 wrote:Clear kick? No way. Panthers got hosed there.
PghSkins wrote:YEAH IM WEARING A PENS SWEATSHIRT AND DRINKING BAD BEER
Gaucho wrote:farnham16 wrote:Clear kick? No way. Panthers got hosed there.
Sorry for your loss.
farnham16 wrote:Gaucho wrote:farnham16 wrote:Clear kick? No way. Panthers got hosed there.
Sorry for your loss.
If that happened to the Pens this board would freak out. It was a really bad call IMO, especially considering they called it a goal on the ice.
farnham16 wrote:Gaucho wrote:farnham16 wrote:Clear kick? No way. Panthers got hosed there.
Sorry for your loss.
If that happened to the Pens this board would freak out. It was a really bad call IMO, especially considering they called it a goal on the ice.
FreeCandy44 wrote:When does this board ever freak out? ;)
Users browsing this forum: Cheeez, E-Ramone, Lesky and 20 guests