crzymike wrote:wow 20 pages?
Seriously man.
Moderators: Three Stars, dagny, pfim, netwolf

Bob McKenzie wrote:Has anyone stopped to consider why LA would trade Kopitar, Brown, and possibly Johnson to us when they can make an offer to Geno after this season?

Bob McKenzie wrote:Has anyone stopped to consider why LA would trade Kopitar, Brown, and possibly Johnson to us when they can make an offer to Geno after this season?
Also, LA needs a goaltender. I'd be more worried about the going after Fleury.
After this draft, LA is sitting where we were two years ago...with a ton of young talent. Putting the shoe on the other foot, I'm not so sure I would trade my young talent (that will be cap friendly for a few years) when I could just plug in a couple of solid veterans and maybe get a lucky cup run.

doublem wrote:Bob McKenzie wrote:Has anyone stopped to consider why LA would trade Kopitar, Brown, and possibly Johnson to us when they can make an offer to Geno after this season?
Also, LA needs a goaltender. I'd be more worried about the going after Fleury.
After this draft, LA is sitting where we were two years ago...with a ton of young talent. Putting the shoe on the other foot, I'm not so sure I would trade my young talent (that will be cap friendly for a few years) when I could just plug in a couple of solid veterans and maybe get a lucky cup run.
They have a goalie they drafter Bernier two years ago.


NJ5934 wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Bottomline is, if it come down to Hossa or Malkin, you let Hossa walk. Malkin is much more valuable right now and will be in the future. Gino makes us a 2 line team, Hossa makes us a one line team.
HeyNow,
I know we've gone round and round on this topic, but it does not come down to Hossa or Malkin....it comes down to Malkin or Hossa.......and a whole lot more. Hossa walks for nothing. Malkin doesn't.
Keeping Malkin doesn't ensure us two effective scoring lines because it wasn't the case until Hossa was brought in. After Crosby returned from injury, 90% of his production was on the PP. Until Hossa arrived, the first line was virtually non-existent at even strength.
This whole issue comes down to whether or not you believe; (1) the Pens will be able to keep Malkin and Crosby long term (i.e. Malkin wants to play in Crosby's shadow), (2) if the Pens would be wise to devote so much salary to two players and (3) will doing so prevent them from filling other keys roles, and in doing so ultimately hurt the franchise.
Like I've said before, to me, this league is now about depth and balance. I see Malkin as a guy who will want his own team to lead. I also think it will be in the Penguins best interest to move Malkin long before he forces them to. The benefit of considering a trade now is obviously not only to maximize the return, but also to keep Hossa, who may well be a crucial piece to the Pens in coming years. I'm not sure I see the sense of bringing in a guy like Kopitar though; I think the Pens would be wiser to look for players that could be signed long term for more reasonable contracts, i.e. Johnson and O'Sullivan. LA certainly is a logical partner, with the #2 pick and young guys like Dustin Brown and Jack Johnson, but for all we know McGuire is spreading this rumor after reading these boards.
Either way, it will be an interesting summer.

Rohit wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:crzymike wrote:I wonder if these same people who believe these trades of Geno are actually worthwhile, would feel the same way if it was Sid instead.farnham16 wrote:Maestro wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Pitts wrote:Henry Hank wrote:I don't see how that helps the Pens. Malkin's the best player involved in that deal, and while Brown is signed to a nice bargain deal, Kopitar is going to be very expensive himself. I like Kopitar and Brown, but it still seems like a quantity over quality move that dilutes your talent and doesn't give you THAT much of a cap relief in the long run.
But, it does give you an AWESOME left wing (Brown) for Crosby and Hossa, and a very nearly equal 2nd line center (Kopitar) to replace Malkin. Kopitar would be a better cap hit for the foreseeable future too.
Kopitar's not even in the same league as Evgeni Malkin. He is nowhere nearly as equal as Malkin. What has Kopitar done so far in 2 years that has been so marvelous? He had 61 points his first season and 77 this past season. Malkin had more points his rookie season than Kopitar did either of his 2 seasons. And Evgeni Malkin is fully capable of carrying a team by himself to the playoffs and beyond. He is a one man show. For anyone to suggest that there is equal trade value coming back to Pittsburgh for Malkin is absolutely insane. I just don't get people like you.
Wow, someome's drank the Geno Koolaid.
I really don't think its Geno Koolaid. I can't believe people on here would trade him and think that getting Brown and Kopitar would be equal value, because it would be highway robbery for LA.
AMEN CRZYMIKE. I was just going to post that too. People like some on these board just make you ask yourself questions. Is there that much difference between Malkin and Crosby? Do people really love Crosby that much more than Malkin? Is Crosby really that much better than Malkin? Does the language barrier hve anything to do with the bias against Malkin?
crosby an malkin are once in a lifetime talents
like one of you two said: any trade involving malkin is bad for the penguins
here is what i dont understand: why are people so bent out of shape NOW about cap trouble? Either way if you have to trade geno you are going to lose, so why not wait until you are ABSOLUTELY SURE that there is NO WAY IN HELL that it is possible to keep geno
right now people are talking about fair return for malkin and most scenarios end up being 3 good players for 1 great player. at the end of the day signing those 3 good players would be just as difficult as signing geno so either way you are screwed cap wise, so why wouldnt you just stick with geno who you know is the real deal
dont forget that crosby and malkin are still nhl young even though they play like vets. imagine how good they are going to be once they actually are vets.
i dont care what people say about tampa bay because geno and crosby >>>>vinny and st louis when it comes to their prime
imo if shero can manage to keep fleury, crosby, and malkin and then somehow fill the rest of the slots will the "right guys" this team will ALWAYS be competitive, maybe not in the cup winning dynasty sense, but as long as you have crosby and malkin on your team with solid goaltending you will have a chance to win every single game you play
the same cannot be said of any other player that you would get in return for a guy like geno and why it makes NO SENSE at all to talk about trading him at this stage in his career.



HeyNow71871929 wrote:Maagwa wrote:Sometimes I'd rather trade Crosby than Malkin.... Malkin is the best of the 3 imo
I think so too. And if he isn't already the best in the world, Gino Malkin will be the best in a year or two. I have never seen, since the days of Mario, a guy who is so explosive with the puck. Even more explosive than Crosby is.

Scott wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Maagwa wrote:Sometimes I'd rather trade Crosby than Malkin.... Malkin is the best of the 3 imo
I think so too. And if he isn't already the best in the world, Gino Malkin will be the best in a year or two. I have never seen, since the days of Mario, a guy who is so explosive with the puck. Even more explosive than Crosby is.
There is a player in Washington I think is just a tad more explosive than # 71.
I also think Sidney is more explosive with the puck than Malkin...but Malkin does have a much better slapshot.

Bob McKenzie wrote:Scott wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Maagwa wrote:Sometimes I'd rather trade Crosby than Malkin.... Malkin is the best of the 3 imo
I think so too. And if he isn't already the best in the world, Gino Malkin will be the best in a year or two. I have never seen, since the days of Mario, a guy who is so explosive with the puck. Even more explosive than Crosby is.
There is a player in Washington I think is just a tad more explosive than # 71.
I also think Sidney is more explosive with the puck than Malkin...but Malkin does have a much better slapshot.
The most explosive player I can remember was Bure. He was unbelievable. Selanne when he first came into the league as well.

Bob McKenzie wrote:Seems that all the fans at letsgokings.com think this trade is as bad as most of us do.
http://www.letsgokings.com/bbs/f4/has_a ... 79315.html

Kovy27 wrote:Bob McKenzie wrote:Scott wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Maagwa wrote:Sometimes I'd rather trade Crosby than Malkin.... Malkin is the best of the 3 imo
I think so too. And if he isn't already the best in the world, Gino Malkin will be the best in a year or two. I have never seen, since the days of Mario, a guy who is so explosive with the puck. Even more explosive than Crosby is.
There is a player in Washington I think is just a tad more explosive than # 71.
I also think Sidney is more explosive with the puck than Malkin...but Malkin does have a much better slapshot.
The most explosive player I can remember was Bure. He was unbelievable. Selanne when he first came into the league as well.
I actually agree with you on those 2. Bure's speed and shot were one of a kind...too bad he got hurt and had to call it quits. Selanne has lost speed but still has one hell of a snapshot.

Bob McKenzie wrote:Seems that all the fans at letsgokings.com think this trade is as bad as most of us do.
http://www.letsgokings.com/bbs/f4/has_a ... 79315.html

Pitts wrote:Bob McKenzie wrote:Seems that all the fans at letsgokings.com think this trade is as bad as most of us do.
http://www.letsgokings.com/bbs/f4/has_a ... 79315.html
But, I thought Malkin was the shizzz. Seems Kings fans hold Anze to just as high a standard.

Actually we dont all believe we can't keep the ''big four''. I believe it's very possible if the players that accompany them are values similar to Sykora. Even with Hossa we'd still be able to keep our core intact. We might have to move Whitney but that's a small price to pay in the scheme of things. A much more viable option then trading Geno, thats for damn sure.LdubsRoot23 wrote:Pitts wrote:Bob McKenzie wrote:Seems that all the fans at letsgokings.com think this trade is as bad as most of us do.
http://www.letsgokings.com/bbs/f4/has_a ... 79315.html
But, I thought Malkin was the shizzz. Seems Kings fans hold Anze to just as high a standard.
I love how people act like Dustin Brown and Kopitar are dog meat. Nobody in their right mind thinks they are better then Geno, but if Dustin Brown pots 30 goals, is a righty, and the biggest hitter in the league at THAT age...he'll more than outplay his long-term contract.
As was said before, Geno is a much better center than Kopitar, but the kid is also still very young, an all-star, will never cost what Geno does, and fits very nicely in that 2nd center slot.
We all know you can't keep Sid, Geno, Fleury, Staal, etc. forever, so Shero can never win in these situations.

LdubsRoot23 wrote:Pitts wrote:Bob McKenzie wrote:Seems that all the fans at letsgokings.com think this trade is as bad as most of us do.
http://www.letsgokings.com/bbs/f4/has_a ... 79315.html
But, I thought Malkin was the shizzz. Seems Kings fans hold Anze to just as high a standard.
I love how people act like Dustin Brown and Kopitar are dog meat. Nobody in their right mind thinks they are better then Geno, but if Dustin Brown pots 30 goals, is a righty, and the biggest hitter in the league at THAT age...he'll more than outplay his long-term contract.
As was said before, Geno is a much better center than Kopitar, but the kid is also still very young, an all-star, will never cost what Geno does, and fits very nicely in that 2nd center slot.
We all know you can't keep Sid, Geno, Fleury, Staal, etc. forever, so Shero can never win in these situations.
Bob McKenzie wrote:Kovy27 wrote:Bob McKenzie wrote:Scott wrote:HeyNow71871929 wrote:Maagwa wrote:Sometimes I'd rather trade Crosby than Malkin.... Malkin is the best of the 3 imo
I think so too. And if he isn't already the best in the world, Gino Malkin will be the best in a year or two. I have never seen, since the days of Mario, a guy who is so explosive with the puck. Even more explosive than Crosby is.
There is a player in Washington I think is just a tad more explosive than # 71.
I also think Sidney is more explosive with the puck than Malkin...but Malkin does have a much better slapshot.
The most explosive player I can remember was Bure. He was unbelievable. Selanne when he first came into the league as well.
I actually agree with you on those 2. Bure's speed and shot were one of a kind...too bad he got hurt and had to call it quits. Selanne has lost speed but still has one hell of a snapshot.
For ol' times memory sake, check out the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th goal that Bure has in this game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL_p_kMMc5E&NR=1

Users browsing this forum: champeen, Inkio, knives of ice, panthers1788, Pitts, The U and 31 guests