Forum for NHR "Wars" Games
the wicked child
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 17,412 Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:11 pm
Location: :scared:
Post
by the wicked child » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:33 pm
Senka wrote: the wicked child wrote: Salt Troy Loney for using a color I can't see on my phone. :p
offical now?
It was semi-joking.
I'll go with unity for now.
Unsalt troy
Salt dagny
cup keeper
ECHL'er
Posts: 1,249 Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Summer in the Second City
Post
by cup keeper » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:35 pm
Looks like its popular.
salt dagny
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,747 Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC
Post
by MWB » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:36 pm
random rules day one. I don't think we should finish anyone off though until they've had a chance to speak.
Senka
AHL All-Star
Posts: 5,988 Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:16 pm
Location: RVA
Post
by Senka » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:37 pm
Code: Select all
Dagny (5)
crayz (1)
Juice (1)
Canaan (1)
cup keeper
ECHL'er
Posts: 1,249 Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:28 pm
Location: Summer in the Second City
Post
by cup keeper » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:37 pm
MWB wrote: random rules day one. I don't think we should finish anyone off though until they've had a chance to speak.
I agree but I wanted to get my vote in before I have to head out to work.
Letang Is The Truth
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 24,978 Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Post
by Letang Is The Truth » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:38 pm
MWB wrote: random rules day one. I don't think we should finish anyone off though until they've had a chance to speak.
I'm on board with this especially with dagny she could be playing us but I am waiting. I will allow things to percolate til then
redwill
AHL All-Star
Posts: 7,342 Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Post
by redwill » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:38 pm
The obvious choice for me is Juice, for four reasons:
1. If he is not a random slug, it makes sense to use the one recruiting to nab the skilled veteran player.
2. Last game, whenever the time came to choose who to salt, half the players would vote to salt Juice and then changed their votes. Let's just get it over with.
3. He did the ramdomized thing last game to get poor TW salted and TW never got a chance to post anything. I don't like random picks (although I can't necessarily think of a better way on the first vote). But anyway, if it's gonna be randomized, I say get the randomizer.
4. Whenever I see his name, I think of orange juice. But his name is green. That's majorly wrong.
salt Juice
PensFanInDC
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 27,917 Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
Location: Fredneck
Post
by PensFanInDC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:43 pm
Letang Is The Truth wrote: MWB wrote: random rules day one. I don't think we should finish anyone off though until they've had a chance to speak.
I'm on board with this especially with dagny she could be playing us but I am waiting. I will allow things to percolate til then
Agreed. My vote is in but that person has a chance to defend himself. 1st day is totally random but at least give the person a chance to say something.
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,747 Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC
Post
by MWB » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:44 pm
redwill wrote: The obvious choice for me is Juice, for four reasons:
1. If he is not a random slug, it makes sense to use the one recruiting to nab the skilled veteran player.
He drew so much heat last game I'm not sure he'd be recruited again. Yes, he last awhile, but I don't see that happening this game.
beerman
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 14,285 Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:19 pm
Post
by beerman » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:46 pm
MWB wrote: redwill wrote: The obvious choice for me is Juice, for four reasons:
1. If he is not a random slug, it makes sense to use the one recruiting to nab the skilled veteran player.
He drew so much heat last game I'm not sure he'd be recruited again. Yes, he last awhile, but I don't see that happening this game.
But if everyone assumes what you just said wouldn't that in turn make him an excellent recruit?
dagny
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 10,181 Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: 68 who?
Post
by dagny » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:46 pm
mmmkay....
I haven't read anything past the first few posts, from last night.
I'm just waking up and getting around. I have to work soon.
shafty says you're calling for my head, in the chat. I have no idea where anything stands, and since I may not get to catch up before I leave for work and/or die, I'll just say:
I'm a regular villager, as well as an active player.
It would only be to the slugs' benefit to get rid of me.
So, if you're foolish enough to run with a bandwagon, pay close attention to who was running up the flagpole most adamantly , once I'm shown to be just a villager. They are sure to be slugs, unless the villagers really are that stupid.
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,747 Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC
Post
by MWB » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:48 pm
beerman wrote: MWB wrote: redwill wrote: The obvious choice for me is Juice, for four reasons:
1. If he is not a random slug, it makes sense to use the one recruiting to nab the skilled veteran player.
He drew so much heat last game I'm not sure he'd be recruited again. Yes, he last awhile, but I don't see that happening this game.
But if everyone assumes what you just said wouldn't that in turn make him an excellent recruit?
True. That is the conundrum that is Juice.
MWB
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,747 Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC
Post
by MWB » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:49 pm
salt dagny
Letang Is The Truth
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 24,978 Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Post
by Letang Is The Truth » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:55 pm
So you're saying there was slug talk in the chat....
:lol:
dagny
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 10,181 Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: 68 who?
Post
by dagny » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:57 pm
Oh, and I swear on Jagr that I'm a regular villager.
Those that know me, know I'd never do that if I was lying.
PensFanInDC
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 27,917 Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
Location: Fredneck
Post
by PensFanInDC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:58 pm
dagny wrote: Oh, and I swear on Jagr that I'm a regular villager.
Those that know me, know I'd never do that if I was lying.
No outside of the game influence...
mac5155
NHL Second Liner
Posts: 48,700 Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
Location: governor of Fayettenam
Post
by mac5155 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:00 pm
sorry ive been at a resume dump , i mean job fair.. lol
dagny
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 10,181 Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: 68 who?
Post
by dagny » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:03 pm
Letang Is The Truth wrote: So you're saying there was slug talk in the chat....
No, I'm saying I woke up, looked at tha chat open on my screen and saw this:
(09:09:27) ChatBot: shafnutz05 logs into the Chat.
(09:09:52) shafnutz05: dagny they are already calling for your head!!!!!!! DAGNY!!!?!!?!!!!?!
Oh, and canaan, most especially knows, that I wouldn't swear on Jagr if I was lying. If that doesn't sway him, there's another tell.
I'm just trying to give you guys an idea of direction to look, once you see that I'm a villager.
I'm a little preoccupied getting ready for work, so I've not got much more of a defense in me than that.
redwill
AHL All-Star
Posts: 7,342 Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Post
by redwill » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:03 pm
MWB wrote: True. That is the conundrum that is Juice.
So go back to my second point. If he's a conundrum, get rid of the conundrum.
dagny
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 10,181 Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 6:06 pm
Location: 68 who?
Post
by dagny » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:04 pm
PensFanInDC wrote: dagny wrote: Oh, and I swear on Jagr that I'm a regular villager.
Those that know me, know I'd never do that if I was lying.
No outside of the game influence...
I swore on Jagr last game, too. Nobody had a problem with it. I didn't make any *bets*, like some other people.
PensFanInDC
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 27,917 Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
Location: Fredneck
Post
by PensFanInDC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:06 pm
dagny wrote: PensFanInDC wrote: dagny wrote: Oh, and I swear on Jagr that I'm a regular villager.
Those that know me, know I'd never do that if I was lying.
No outside of the game influence...
I swore on Jagr last game, too. Nobody had a problem with it. I didn't make any *bets*, like some other people.
pwnd
Troy Loney
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 28,922 Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Pittsburgh
Post
by Troy Loney » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:13 pm
if the slugs paid any attention to last game they would not recruit an active player....just look at the lost of surviving players from last game...they're best bet is to just recruit someone who flies under the rader....
as for a player like juice....he should be kept around....if he's not a slug, they'll probably just kill him soon so they dont have to worry about him...but if its like 4-5 saltings into the game and all he's said is "salt zarovich, he's QUIET"....then we should probably salt him.
sdm5055
ECHL'er
Posts: 2,043 Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:35 pm
Location: Back in the P to the A
Post
by sdm5055 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:14 pm
beerman wrote: MWB wrote: redwill wrote: The obvious choice for me is Juice, for four reasons:
1. If he is not a random slug, it makes sense to use the one recruiting to nab the skilled veteran player.
He drew so much heat last game I'm not sure he'd be recruited again. Yes, he last awhile, but I don't see that happening this game.
But if everyone assumes what you just said wouldn't that in turn make him an excellent recruit?
or would they assume that everyone assumed that?
PensFanInDC
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 27,917 Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
Location: Fredneck
Post
by PensFanInDC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:18 pm
sdm5055 wrote: or would they assume that everyone assumed that?
I would assume...
beerman
NHL Healthy Scratch
Posts: 14,285 Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:19 pm
Post
by beerman » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:18 pm
sdm5055 wrote: or would they assume that everyone assumed that?
but what if we assume that they will assume that?