Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
lynch TEIB. Has to be red.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,710
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: Remember the Pav!
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
my gut says shafnutz and teib
willing to listen to others?
willing to listen to others?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,710
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: Remember the Pav!
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
whatcha mean has to be?relantel wrote:lynch TEIB. Has to be red.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
i'm gonna go with mike's dying wish and lynch crayz
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
kill shafnutz
The early jump (3rd!!!) on nan and then his post about "I don't see a redwill vote today" was an attempt to distance himself from MWB.
The early jump (3rd!!!) on nan and then his post about "I don't see a redwill vote today" was an attempt to distance himself from MWB.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
I am certain he has to be, but redwill has good reason too. I like either.crayz wrote:whatcha mean has to be?relantel wrote:lynch TEIB. Has to be red.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
how so?relantel wrote:lynch TEIB. Has to be red.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
* either TEIB or shaf.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
Nice observation on distancing from MWB. At this point I think that is by far the best bit of evidence we have against anyone.redwill wrote:kill shafnutz
The early jump (3rd!!!) on nan and then his post about "I don't see a redwill vote today" was an attempt to distance himself from MWB.
kill shaft
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
You voted for crayz.the errey i breathe wrote:how so?relantel wrote:lynch TEIB. Has to be red.

-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
if anyone has anything solid let's go with that. I could be convinced on shaf if he was trying to get away from MWB. however just saying you're certain someone "has to be" doesn't help and in fact could end up giving this game to the wolves/mafia
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
unlynch TEIB (for now)
lynch shaf
lynch shaf
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
like i said i can get on a shaf vote. unlynch crayz lynch shaf. relantel, i don't see how me voting for crayz proves anything. especially since i did it AFTER you were convinced. i wasn't going to dagny myself.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
unlynch shaf
i'm gonna wait and see on this one actually. no sense jumping on him right away without his say. relantel is making me very suspicious now
i'm gonna wait and see on this one actually. no sense jumping on him right away without his say. relantel is making me very suspicious now
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
i think its a little strange that relantel was "certain" i was red yet jumps off of me to shaf. i think he's just trying to start up a quick lynch since it only takes 4 and have us kill another blue.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
It was already 4 against shaf. He should be done.the errey i breathe wrote:unlynch shaf
i'm gonna wait and see on this one actually. no sense jumping on him right away without his say. relantel is making me very suspicious now
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
Limit reached?
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,876
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:39 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
oh, well if so relantel is definitely next on my list.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,710
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: Remember the Pav!
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
Shaf already had limit reached
If shaf is blue/green we just lost i think
7 people left....and 3 are bad. If shaf is good, we are down to 3. 3-3 = bad guy win?
If shaf is blue/green we just lost i think
7 people left....and 3 are bad. If shaf is good, we are down to 3. 3-3 = bad guy win?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread



Nice. You just took out your seer. That's what I get for jumping on a half hour conference call.
FYI, the reason why I said I couldn't see a vote for redwill at the moment is because redwill is the FREAKING GREEN ANGEL!!!
Sigh....
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,710
- Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:17 pm
- Location: Remember the Pav!
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
ughshafnutz05 wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
Nice. You just took out your seer. That's what I get for jumping on a half hour conference call.
FYI, the reason why I said I couldn't see a vote for redwill at the moment is because redwill is the FREAKING GREEN ANGEL!!!
Sigh....
i guess thats game? canaan confirm?
imo, let's do another, but with 11-12 guys....4 bad is a lil high. maybe start 2 bad +1 recruit?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
Nope, it isn't game.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
Hold yer horses. It's obvious to me that shaf is lying.crayz wrote:ugh
i guess thats game? canaan confirm?
imo, let's do another, but with 11-12 guys....4 bad is a lil high. maybe start 2 bad +1 recruit?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 39,689
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:13 am
- Location: Nevin Shapiro A&M
Re: Quick Wars Part II Game Thread
write up coming
i made an executive order in this game and i just realized the gigantic flaw in it. crap.
i made an executive order in this game and i just realized the gigantic flaw in it. crap.