***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****

Post by **Kicksave** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:39 pm

blue MWB
unperson DocEmrick

Post by **Kicksave** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:39 pm

vaporize/whatever DocEmrick w/ the correct color

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:41 pm

crayz - 2 (zaro, Dr. Emrick)
zaro - 1 (crayz)
Dr. Emrick - 2 (Mac, KS)

10 to unperson.

Post by **pittsports87** » Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:11 pm

vaporize docemerick

count2infinity · Post by **count2infinity** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 6:24 am

crayz said it himself... he was third on that vote...

vaporize crayz.

thehockeyguru · Post by **thehockeyguru** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:06 am

vaporize zaro

Post by **canaan** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:12 am

yellow zaro while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty, smiting zaro is always a good route.

mac5155 · Post by **mac5155** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:14 am

this game is so hard to play in maxthon theme. but maxthon also looks like the user interface of a program i use at work. so I will have to sacrifice

thehockeyguru · Post by **thehockeyguru** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:27 am

canaan wrote:
while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty.

what are you getting at

Post by **canaan** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:28 am

thehockeyguru wrote:
canaan wrote:
while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty.
what are you getting at

you make poor decisions in warz games.

newarenanow · Post by **newarenanow** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:29 am

vaporize zaro

Zarovich · Post by **Zarovich** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:45 am

canaan wrote:
yellow zaro while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty, smiting zaro is always a good route.

If the "random wheel of death" is not available, I guess you have to do your own dirty work...

Post by **canaan** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:52 am

Zarovich wrote:
canaan wrote:
yellow zaro while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty, smiting zaro is always a good route.
If the "random wheel of death" is not available, I guess you have to do your own dirty work...

Post by **the wicked child** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:55 am

I think I'm going to vaporize crayz.

Seems like he played up the fact that he was the third voter to get us to say "well, if he's pointing that out, he can't be bad". It's been over a decade since I read the book, so I don't recall if that counts as doublethink or not... seems more solid reasoning than "he's a newb" or "it's zaro" at this juncture.

Post by **Kicksave** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 8:57 am

blue docemerick
vaporize crayz

Azkar · Post by **Azkar** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:00 am

the wicked child wrote:
I think I'm going to vaporize crayz.

Seems like he played up the fact that he was the third voter to get us to say "well, if he's pointing that out, he can't be bad". It's been over a decade since I read the book, so I don't recall if that counts as doublethink or not... seems more solid reasoning than "he's a newb" or "it's zaro" at this juncture.

I like this... it's a theory that actually makes sense as opposed to random voting

unperson crayz

newarenanow · Post by **newarenanow** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:13 am

the wicked child wrote:
I think I'm going to vaporize crayz.

Seems like he played up the fact that he was the third voter to get us to say "well, if he's pointing that out, he can't be bad". It's been over a decade since I read the book, so I don't recall if that counts as doublethink or not... seems more solid reasoning than "he's a newb" or "it's zaro" at this juncture.

Sounds reasonable.

person Zaro
unperson crayz

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:16 am

crayz - 7 (zaro, Dr. Emrick, seetwoeye, TWC, KS, Azkar, NAN)
zaro - 3 (crayz, THG, canaan)
Dr. Emrick - 2 (Mac, pittsports)

10 to unperson.

Post by **Malkamaniac** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:38 am

I'm liking twc's theory.

Vaporize crayz

Post by **pittsports87** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:41 am

person docemerick[/color
]vaporize crayz

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:41 am

crayz - 9 (zaro, Dr. Emrick, seetwoeye, TWC, KS, Azkar, NAN, malka, pittsports)
zaro - 3 (crayz, THG, canaan)
Dr. Emrick - 1 (Mac)

10 to unperson.

Post by **pittsports87** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:43 am

Wow that got messed up bad. Lets try that again:
person docemerick
vaporize crayz

Post by **PensFanInDC** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:44 am

kill crayz to get things movin'

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:46 am

crayz - 10 (zaro, Dr. Emrick, seetwoeye, TWC, KS, Azkar, NAN, malka, pittsports, pfidc)
zaro - 3 (crayz, THG, canaan)
Dr. Emrick - 1 (Mac)

Limit reached, writeup coming.

thehockeyguru · Post by **thehockeyguru** » Thu Sep 16, 2010 9:47 am

canaan wrote:
thehockeyguru wrote:
canaan wrote:
while agreeing on a vote with thg makes me feel dirty.
what are you getting at
you make poor decisions in warz games.

Surely you jest

* 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *

Re: * 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *