This would not be the first time that THG has voted for me because I decided not to vote for him.Troy Loney wrote:But i think its weird that thg is now arguing with shaf about this...
SNATCH (the game thread)
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
MWB had every right to vote for me on day 1 because of what happened last game. I find it odd that the seer voted for me day 1 and then shifted his vote to shaf. My vote is sticking with Shaf.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
lynch shaf
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
That's not a baddie tell in my book.count2infinity wrote:bob is acting very, ha ha ish this game. laughing about everything, normally a baddie tell. i have nothing else to go off of so...........
lynch BCS
unlynch Bob's Cold Serenity
lynch count2infinity
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
"Bob's Cold Serenity"


-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
lynch Kraftster
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4,821
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: beyondauction [16:54:33] you are scammer
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
I'm sorry for my complete and total inactivity this game so far. Just did a very quick read, but it seems as though there hasn't been much but bandwagons and minor RPs getting killt so far. I'll read up and see if I can pick anything up.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Hello. I am sick and was useless yesterday.
What is the whole "minor RP" thing about?
What is the whole "minor RP" thing about?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
so shaf and i are essentially saying the same thing, and agreeing with one another. shaf had the seer vote on him, but yet you vote for me? interesting. (and i know this could come off as sarcastic, but i'm honestly intrigued.)redwill wrote:That's not a baddie tell in my book.count2infinity wrote:bob is acting very, ha ha ish this game. laughing about everything, normally a baddie tell. i have nothing else to go off of so...........
lynch BCS
unlynch Bob's Cold Serenity
lynch count2infinity
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
thehockeyguru wrote:What made you say NAN? He kind of stuck out to me a bit as well?
Why did I stick out?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13,430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Can we get a count?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
I don't even know if anyone is around, including the mods.doublem wrote:Can we get a count?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Shaf -5- (zaro, TEIB, Troy, THG, Pittsports)
BCS -3- (Mac, Redwill, c2i, shaf)
Mac -1- (BCS)
Azkar -1- (doublem)
c2i -1- (redwill)
Krafty -1- (nan)
Rel -0- (thg)
BCS -3- (Mac, Redwill, c2i, shaf)
Mac -1- (BCS)
Azkar -1- (doublem)
c2i -1- (redwill)
Krafty -1- (nan)
Rel -0- (thg)
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
count's count... it's official. i think.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
I guess your lobbying for Malka struck me as a bit odd. Your vote for Kraftster kind of reaffirmed that uneasy feeling.newarenanow wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:What made you say NAN? He kind of stuck out to me a bit as well?
Why did I stick out?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Why is it any different than what everyone else was voting for last round?thehockeyguru wrote:I guess your lobbying for Malka struck me as a bit odd. Your vote for Kraftster kind of reaffirmed that uneasy feeling.newarenanow wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:What made you say NAN? He kind of stuck out to me a bit as well?
Why did I stick out?
W/O much knowledge right now, I figured we'd save the village a ton of possible headache in the future if we were wrong.
Kraftsters three posts in a row explaining out all of his thought process on all possible people mentioned last vote struck me as odd this early in the game, hence the vote on him.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
I feel really dense, but I read this a couple times and I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. How is it we know anyone that mwb investigated?Troy Loney wrote:to clarify. he's not someone mwb investigated and was blue.
plus i'm still curious as to why shaf felt the need to deflect a thg bandwagon. could be nothing, but not sure why he would care enough to make a point to nip a thg vote in the bud.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
teib's
followed by a merethe errey i breathe wrote:I forgot that i had signed up for this game which sucks because i had plenty of time at work today. I'll read up and then vote.
sort of stands out to me as being strange.the errey i breathe wrote:lynch shaf
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Kraftster wrote:I feel really dense, but I read this a couple times and I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. How is it we know anyone that mwb investigated?Troy Loney wrote:to clarify. he's not someone mwb investigated and was blue.
plus i'm still curious as to why shaf felt the need to deflect a thg bandwagon. could be nothing, but not sure why he would care enough to make a point to nip a thg vote in the bud.
i'm just saying that he isn't someone that mwb investigated and turned up blue...that is all.
it's just saying that with shaf we have a marginally higher probability of having got a red.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
not so much strange as suspicious I mean.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Oh, you mean because of his vote the day before. I understand now. I am really engrossed in this brief I'm writing, haha, that took me way too long to understand.Troy Loney wrote:Kraftster wrote:I feel really dense, but I read this a couple times and I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. How is it we know anyone that mwb investigated?Troy Loney wrote:to clarify. he's not someone mwb investigated and was blue.
plus i'm still curious as to why shaf felt the need to deflect a thg bandwagon. could be nothing, but not sure why he would care enough to make a point to nip a thg vote in the bud.
i'm just saying that he isn't someone that mwb investigated and turned up blue...that is all.
it's just saying that with shaf we have a marginally higher probability of having got a red.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Where the heck is everyone?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Just trying to be transparent in my thought process. Simple "lynch ______" don't really offer anything and we seem to be getting a lot of that lately (not this game per se, just in general). Just sort of stream-of-consciousness-ing my thoughts (like I'm doing now).newarenanow wrote:thehockeyguru wrote:I guess your lobbying for Malka struck me as a bit odd. Your vote for Kraftster kind of reaffirmed that uneasy feeling.newarenanow wrote:
Why did I stick out?
Kraftsters three posts in a row explaining out all of his thought process on all possible people mentioned last vote struck me as odd this early in the game, hence the vote on him.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
I am more inclined to go with BCS. Like was pointed out, he was doing his "ha ha" self early on and since he's gotten a little heat, he's sort of disappeared. Last game he was blue and he caused a bit of confusion in my opinion by keeping up the ha ha thing. Using that as a baseline for his blue conduct, I could see him being a bit spooked about the attention in his first game as a red.
lynch bob cole
lynch bob cole
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: SNATCH (the game thread)
Not sure I like a Shaf vote right now. And don't know what to make of BCS.
Thought about c2i but I think my vote will be on ps87. He's saying far lot less than normal. Yeah, it muddies the waters even further.
Lynch pittsports87.
Thought about c2i but I think my vote will be on ps87. He's saying far lot less than normal. Yeah, it muddies the waters even further.
Lynch pittsports87.