**WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,205
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:46 am
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Waiting for one more PM.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,205
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:46 am
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Write-up Coming.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
<deep breath>
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,118
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:33 pm
- Location: 39°6′32″N 76°46′17″W
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
columbia wrote:<deep breath>
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,205
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:46 am
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
All of the killing over the past few days and nights really shook up the entire village. They had managed to kill off two of the wolves, but one was still lurking out there looking to strike at the most unexpected moment. The entire village gathered at DocEmrick's house to catch the Pens and Capitals game. Out of the corner of his eye, the last wolf saw DocEmrick double-dipping his chip. The Wolf then mercilessly tore DocEmrick apart in his own home and then proceeded to double dip his own chip to add insult to injury.
Ahh, but in the final analysis, DocEmrick was:
Luckily, for the villagers, the vig also attended this party. He stood ready, took aim, fired...and proceeded to miss the last wolf and instead hit Benny Fitz who was
The Village of Art Vandelay
1. Relantel
2. pittsports87
3. Troy Loney
4. Columbia
5. Cup keeper
6. mac5155
7. Zarovich
8. Doublem
9. MWB
IT IS NOW DAY 5
With 9 villagers left, it takes 5 to lynch.
Ahh, but in the final analysis, DocEmrick was:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
1. Relantel
2. pittsports87
3. Troy Loney
4. Columbia
5. Cup keeper
6. mac5155
7. Zarovich
8. Doublem
9. MWB
IT IS NOW DAY 5
With 9 villagers left, it takes 5 to lynch.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,118
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:33 pm
- Location: 39°6′32″N 76°46′17″W
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**

-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
carry on my wayward towns people.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13,430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
kill troy
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
doublem wrote:kill troy

-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,249
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Summer in the Second City
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Care to explain?doublem wrote:kill troy
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,249
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Summer in the Second City
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Troy was the second vote on shaf after me. I don't think he would do that if he were red when there were already two votes on me and he could have just started that bandwagon.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13,430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Just a guess. I'm not really sure who is bad at the moment.cup keeper wrote:Care to explain?doublem wrote:kill troy
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
I voted shad because i feel like if we let him lay low like that he could just pop out at then end and we'd have more to go on with other people because of his inactivity....i didn't really think he was bad, i just knew he wasn't a green role player.
i wonder if doublem sacrificed shad there to clear himself?
i wonder if doublem sacrificed shad there to clear himself?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13,430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
No, I just thought that shad wasn't playing so a kill would be good.Troy Loney wrote:I voted shad because i feel like if we let him lay low like that he could just pop out at then end and we'd have more to go on with other people because of his inactivity....i didn't really think he was bad, i just knew he wasn't a green role player.
i wonder if doublem sacrificed shad there to clear himself?
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,249
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:28 pm
- Location: Summer in the Second City
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Could be the case. doublem's vote while on shaf at one point ended on bennie fitz.Troy Loney wrote:I voted shad because i feel like if we let him lay low like that he could just pop out at then end and we'd have more to go on with other people because of his inactivity....i didn't really think he was bad, i just knew he wasn't a green role player.
i wonder if doublem sacrificed shad there to clear himself?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 13,430
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:05 pm
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
I'm not bad.
unlynch troy
for now. Zaro could be bad, maybe even rel.
unlynch troy
for now. Zaro could be bad, maybe even rel.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Relantel was pretty quick to observe that DocEmrick was protected on Night 3.
Meaningful?
Meaningful?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
well I was gonna vote for Benny Fitz but assuming the vig did it for us, I got nothin.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
mac5155 wrote:well I was gonna vote for Benny Fitz but assuming the vig did it for us, I got nothin.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
lynch pittsports87
i don't really have anything, he did have a pretty lame excuse when the first day bandwagon was started on him...and i don't want to clear him because the first day bandwagon was derailed from him to a wolf, the both could have been bad
i don't really have anything, he did have a pretty lame excuse when the first day bandwagon was started on him...and i don't want to clear him because the first day bandwagon was derailed from him to a wolf, the both could have been bad
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,205
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:46 am
- Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
I don't want to set a deadline today, because these next votes are very important. If things do drag on, I'll cut it off at 5.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
Did Doc clear pittsport? I went back and looked, but I wasn't really sure.
The only person seeming suspicious to me is columbia. He's posting regularly, but not saying much. Maybe that's just because it's his first time (:pop:) though.
The only person seeming suspicious to me is columbia. He's posting regularly, but not saying much. Maybe that's just because it's his first time (:pop:) though.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
I was already cleared by Doc.Troy Loney wrote:lynch pittsports87
i don't really have anything, he did have a pretty lame excuse when the first day bandwagon was started on him...and i don't want to clear him because the first day bandwagon was derailed from him to a wolf, the both could have been bad
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: **WEREWOLF XVII GAME THREAD**
DocEmrick wrote:It was not ps87