Offical Arena Thread: 2/1/07
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,686
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:15 pm
- Location: Serenity Now, Serenity Now.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
-
- Junior 'A'
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:09 pm
I took that to mean that the Pen's "sources" sometimes put things out there, whether it be certain info, or denying certain things, soley for the sake of public consumption/dealing in the media.newarenanow wrote:Stoosh, or anyone else, what do you mean when Rossi says he doesn't always buy what the PEns are selling.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,666
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:07 am
- Location: The Land of Condescending Posters
-
- Junior 'A'
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:09 pm
Yeah he did say that things might be super close, but that they want everything detail proof/iron clad for any announcement so that something does not blow up in their face. So that when they do make an announcement it is final and they can make a big PR splash.Corban87 wrote:By that they are not close to a deal. He feels that both sides are trying to stay quite, so they can make a big splash together in the announcement.newarenanow wrote:Stoosh, or anyone else, what do you mean when Rossi says he doesn't always buy what the PEns are selling.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
I can definitley agree with that. That would be the worst if they announced it, then realized something was off and couldn't get it resolved. That would kill me more than them announcing they were moving straight up.td_ice wrote:Yeah he did say that things might be super close, but that they want everything detail proof/iron clad for any announcement so that something does not blow up in their face. So that when they do make an announcement it is final and they can make a big PR splash.Corban87 wrote:By that they are not close to a deal. He feels that both sides are trying to stay quite, so they can make a big splash together in the announcement.newarenanow wrote:Stoosh, or anyone else, what do you mean when Rossi says he doesn't always buy what the PEns are selling.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:41 pm
- Location: Shaler
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:33 am
- Location: McCandless Twp, PA
Yes, but why would Burkle just throw $10 million away just to pay off IoC, especially when its a limited partnership, without getting something in return? That is not a smart business move and Burkle is not a stupid business man, as evidenced by his accumulated wealth.MarioLemieux1992 wrote:he is the majority owner though....dboss wrote:Right, but that is Burkle. Burkle and the LGP are totally separate for legal purposes. Burkle has not earned a $$$ from this 'investment' yet so I see no need for him to just pay the fee. If Burkle were just to write a check he would want something in return, such as a higher % of ownership in the club.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:37 pm
- Location: Odenton, MD
People like, say, MM himself? What a bloviating hypocrite.Mad City Mike wrote:MM closed with shot at LGP yet again, criticizing those who hang on every message board post.
And for those who say he's shamelessly toying with emotions just to get ratings, well perhaps that's because he now has to..........
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07025/756683-194.stm
.............though he'd never own up to it, of course.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,686
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:15 pm
- Location: Serenity Now, Serenity Now.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:33 am
- Location: McCandless Twp, PA
I hear 'ya! It should would make things a lot easier and less stressful.MarioLemieux1992 wrote:i wish he was stuipeddboss wrote:Yes, but why would Burkle just throw $10 million away just to pay off IoC, especially when its a limited partnership, without getting something in return? That is not a smart business move and Burkle is not a stupid business man, as evidenced by his accumulated wealth.MarioLemieux1992 wrote:he is the majority owner though....dboss wrote:Right, but that is Burkle. Burkle and the LGP are totally separate for legal purposes. Burkle has not earned a $$$ from this 'investment' yet so I see no need for him to just pay the fee. If Burkle were just to write a check he would want something in return, such as a higher % of ownership in the club.

-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:37 pm
- Location: Odenton, MD
More specifically--grasping for every bit of good news.Stoosh wrote:Haha! Madden closes by asking if the people who follow this situation on the message boards like carp grasping for every nugget should be considered pathetic. Rossi said those people should be considered exhausted.
Which is quite understandable given the sea of media negativity we've been engulfed in for several months, largely by the, er, "super genius" himself.....
"The fix is in!"
"If they don't get the license, they're gone!"
"Plan B is a fraud!"
"Murstein is a stooge, doing the Three Amigos' bidding!"
Or something like that.

-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:41 pm
- Location: Shaler
So, to summerize what has come out today:
Fontana says they are close.
Madden says they haven't spoken in 5 or 6 days and Fontana isn't a good source of information.
Rossi says a deal could be done today or tomorrow.
Ravenstahl says they are close, but a face-to-face meeting is needed.
Rendell says a deal isn't close and this should be done by the end of February.
Also, a middle ground on development rights and/or revenue has been reached, but the sticking point is the $10 million payment to IOC. Rendell has reportedly offered a higher payment for the St. Francis property to offset this loss.
Did I miss anything?
Fontana says they are close.
Madden says they haven't spoken in 5 or 6 days and Fontana isn't a good source of information.
Rossi says a deal could be done today or tomorrow.
Ravenstahl says they are close, but a face-to-face meeting is needed.
Rendell says a deal isn't close and this should be done by the end of February.
Also, a middle ground on development rights and/or revenue has been reached, but the sticking point is the $10 million payment to IOC. Rendell has reportedly offered a higher payment for the St. Francis property to offset this loss.
Did I miss anything?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,686
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:15 pm
- Location: Serenity Now, Serenity Now.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:41 pm
- Location: Shaler
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,465
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 7:30 am
- Location: At the pub
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:41 pm
- Location: Shaler
Yeah, I forgot about that. I know it wouldn't help as far as negotiating is concerned, but I would like something from the Pens.MarioLemieux1992 wrote:and mario isn't talking..JDJ8766 wrote:So, to summerize what has come out today:
Fontana says they are close.
Madden says they haven't spoken in 5 or 6 days and Fontana isn't a good source of information.
Rossi says a deal could be done today or tomorrow.
Ravenstahl says they are close, but a face-to-face meeting is needed.
Rendell says a deal isn't close and this should be done by the end of February.
Also, a middle ground on development rights and/or revenue has been reached, but the sticking point is the $10 million payment to IOC. Rendell has reportedly offered a higher payment for the St. Francis property to offset this loss.
Did I miss anything?
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:33 am
- Location: McCandless Twp, PA
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:33 am
- Location: McCandless Twp, PA