steve784 wrote:Make that +8...........US 0 - Jagr 2
2nd period scoring summary:
2-0 Jaromir Jagr (wrist) PP (so only +7 still)
steve784 wrote:Make that +8...........US 0 - Jagr 2
I was thinking when will it be Jagrover for you.spiritfan wrote:please rename this threaad "Jagr Skates"
On July 1....No.fleury495 wrote:just outta curiosity have we determined if he would have to pass through waivers or not?
Ok thanks man, the only reason I was worried about waivers, was if by some miracle jagr would sign with us, the islanders would probably claim him just because they like to claim players who won't want to play for themcolumbia wrote:On July 1....No.fleury495 wrote:just outta curiosity have we determined if he would have to pass through waivers or not?
I love that there are "rumors" because Rossi said he's being invited for a golf outing.The Snapshot wrote:Versus coverage mentioning the rumors. Zach Parise said it could be very interesting if the Pittsburgh Penguin rumors are true. That said, I think it is a lot of wishful thinking.
I wouldn't have a problem with him being a low dollar chance at someone who can score some goals. His work rate might be sporadic at this point, but he is still great with the puck and has the great wrister.
Don't forget that Bioshock said there could be news on Thursday or Friday.tonysoprano wrote:I love that there are "rumors" because Rossi said he's being invited for a golf outing.The Snapshot wrote:Versus coverage mentioning the rumors. Zach Parise said it could be very interesting if the Pittsburgh Penguin rumors are true. That said, I think it is a lot of wishful thinking.
I wouldn't have a problem with him being a low dollar chance at someone who can score some goals. His work rate might be sporadic at this point, but he is still great with the puck and has the great wrister.
I agree with that. I'm not buying the "we're interested in signing him" kool-aid. After the way the Kovalev thing worked out, I can't see Shero or (especially) Bylsma being anxious to try something along those lines (player that doesnt' necessarily fit with their style of play / coach's system) again (for a full year, no less).The Snapshot wrote:Don't forget that Bioshock said there could be news on Thursday or Friday.
I do think Shero is merely looking to talk personally since it seems he may not have been getting any messages through Omsk. Sounds like they just want him to feel that he is still welcome to be involved as a Pens alum, since there is no perceived tampering with a player under contract with a KHL club.
Did you feel that Guerin fit the system in 2009?tonysoprano wrote:I agree with that. I'm not buying the "we're interested in signing him" kool-aid. After the way the Kovalev thing worked out, I can't see Shero or (especially) Bylsma being anxious to try something along those lines (player that doesnt' necessarily fit with their style of play / coach's system) again (for a full year, no less).The Snapshot wrote:Don't forget that Bioshock said there could be news on Thursday or Friday.
I do think Shero is merely looking to talk personally since it seems he may not have been getting any messages through Omsk. Sounds like they just want him to feel that he is still welcome to be involved as a Pens alum, since there is no perceived tampering with a player under contract with a KHL club.
Far moreso than Kovalev or Jagr would.columbia wrote:Did you feel that Guerin fit the system in 2009?tonysoprano wrote:I agree with that. I'm not buying the "we're interested in signing him" kool-aid. After the way the Kovalev thing worked out, I can't see Shero or (especially) Bylsma being anxious to try something along those lines (player that doesnt' necessarily fit with their style of play / coach's system) again (for a full year, no less).The Snapshot wrote:Don't forget that Bioshock said there could be news on Thursday or Friday.
I do think Shero is merely looking to talk personally since it seems he may not have been getting any messages through Omsk. Sounds like they just want him to feel that he is still welcome to be involved as a Pens alum, since there is no perceived tampering with a player under contract with a KHL club.
And Guerin was largely signed because of his effectiveness during a cup run, when he was effective. Nevermind the fact that columbia asked about 2009, thus I thought that was the time he was referring to, not the "full season" which was 09-10.joopen wrote:Really? Guerin couldn't forecheck, receive a pass, onetime a shot, win a board battle, or really do much of anything for his full season here.
Why is THAT the litmus test? Again - Guerin was signed because he worked during a Cup - unfortunately, he wore down quickly - Kovy was a hail mary for the outset. Why are we considering chucking up another one when it's not necessary?joopen wrote:Not saying Jagr fits like a glove but he really couldn't be worse than Kovy this year or Guerin last year.
lolol, I posted a quoted a fake Bioshock quote and it's being repeated...nice.The Snapshot wrote:Don't forget that Bioshock said there could be news on Thursday or Friday.tonysoprano wrote:I love that there are "rumors" because Rossi said he's being invited for a golf outing.The Snapshot wrote:Versus coverage mentioning the rumors. Zach Parise said it could be very interesting if the Pittsburgh Penguin rumors are true. That said, I think it is a lot of wishful thinking.
I wouldn't have a problem with him being a low dollar chance at someone who can score some goals. His work rate might be sporadic at this point, but he is still great with the puck and has the great wrister.
I do think Shero is merely looking to talk personally since it seems he may not have been getting any messages through Omsk. Sounds like they just want him to feel that he is still welcome to be involved as a Pens alum, since there is no perceived tampering with a player under contract with a KHL club.
shafnutz05 wrote:lolol, I posted a quoted a fake Bioshock quote and it's being repeated...nice.
I'm not really on board with Jagr anyways. I was just wondering how his fitting the system was worse than a man who was a detriment for an entire season.tonysoprano wrote:Why is THAT the litmus test? Again - Guerin was signed because he worked during a Cup - unfortunately, he wore down quickly - Kovy was a hail mary for the outset. Why are we considering chucking up another one when it's not necessary?joopen wrote:Not saying Jagr fits like a glove but he really couldn't be worse than Kovy this year or Guerin last year.
Lol, what a joke reporter. He knew the tone of his report and he wrote it on purpose to make it interesting to people, he's starting to back away now.tonysoprano wrote:Rossi: As I reported yesterday, #Pens interest in Jagr is legacy, not to play: http://bit.ly/lHmOi9" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;