*** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Congratulations to JToR for 1000 pages!
The game is done.
PFIDC was the last baddie.
Village wins!
I'll have what little details you don't know in a little while!
The game is done.
PFIDC was the last baddie.
Village wins!
I'll have what little details you don't know in a little while!
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
I still dont see what makes me a baddie 

-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 22,691
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:57 pm
- Location: Source, Destination, Protocol, Port, size, sequence number, check sum... Yep, that about covers it.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
A dead Baddie... please visit the post game "Dead Thread"PensFanInDC wrote:I still dont see what makes me a baddie

-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Yay. I guess I was impatient and right.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
really was kraft not voting for thg which made me switch my vote.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Thanks to all for playing in my Experiment #3. Thanks especially to Kraftster who got some discussion going where there seemed to be only empty spaces.
EPP was the first baddie. He had a recruit which he didn't have time to use. He was replaced by PFIDC, the second baddie.
I wanted to separate the baddies so that they couldn't communicate. But I didn't want them to kill each other. So I staggered the baddies: If EPP died without making his recruit, a blue would be randomly selected to replace him. That was PFIDC.
SDD was the seer. He investigated EPP on night one.
relantel was the angel.
I can go back and figger out who voted for whom on any night, if you like.
thg was again the key player, IMO. He went after EPP on Day 1 for no good reason, but he later pushed for PFIDC. How he got that I'll never know.
SDD voted for PFIDC right after PFIDC became the baddie. Again, weird.
If you have any specific questions, I'll answer them.
Thanks again for playing.
EPP was the first baddie. He had a recruit which he didn't have time to use. He was replaced by PFIDC, the second baddie.
I wanted to separate the baddies so that they couldn't communicate. But I didn't want them to kill each other. So I staggered the baddies: If EPP died without making his recruit, a blue would be randomly selected to replace him. That was PFIDC.
SDD was the seer. He investigated EPP on night one.
relantel was the angel.
I can go back and figger out who voted for whom on any night, if you like.
thg was again the key player, IMO. He went after EPP on Day 1 for no good reason, but he later pushed for PFIDC. How he got that I'll never know.
SDD voted for PFIDC right after PFIDC became the baddie. Again, weird.
If you have any specific questions, I'll answer them.
Thanks again for playing.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
I seered EPP, slappy, and nan before being killed. Never got to really use my abilities since slappy was killed the same night I seered him and I was killed the night I seered NAN. I seered EPP on a hunch. Luckily thg voted for him to and that created a bit of a run.
I voted for PDIFC before trying to get a tie to prevent canaan from being killed. PDIFC's explanation as to why he voted the way he did seemed suspicious to me but looking back it was probably the actual reason. I was also just making a vote to keep the vote total tied so no one would be voted off. That way I could seerer NAN that night since canaan claimed to be blue.
I voted for PDIFC before trying to get a tie to prevent canaan from being killed. PDIFC's explanation as to why he voted the way he did seemed suspicious to me but looking back it was probably the actual reason. I was also just making a vote to keep the vote total tied so no one would be voted off. That way I could seerer NAN that night since canaan claimed to be blue.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
What are the results of these experiments.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Experiment suggestion:
A variation on this theme, where the voting/discussion is fully in the open but the role (if any) of the dead is never revealed...I suppose that would best work, if the reds weren't aware of each other
A variation on this theme, where the voting/discussion is fully in the open but the role (if any) of the dead is never revealed...I suppose that would best work, if the reds weren't aware of each other
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
I thought you were the seer SDD. Other than that I wasn't on the right track very much aside from thinking that EPP might have been red. Don't know that the village could have really won any sooner, though, unless from a lucky kill.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Why am I so good?redwill wrote:thg was again the key player, IMO. He went after EPP on Day 1 for no good reason, but he later pushed for PFIDC. How he got that I'll never know.
If you have any specific questions, I'll answer them.
Thanks again for playing.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
I'm more interested in the source of your modesty.thehockeyguru wrote:Why am I so good?redwill wrote:thg was again the key player, IMO. He went after EPP on Day 1 for no good reason, but he later pushed for PFIDC. How he got that I'll never know.
If you have any specific questions, I'll answer them.
Thanks again for playing.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
FWIW, redwill had it constructed that two left (me and a red) would not be a draw but would go to the baddies. This was why that day vote was the game, either way.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Modesty is for those who stumble upon victory, not those who perfect it.columbia wrote:I'm more interested in the source of your modesty.thehockeyguru wrote:Why am I so good?redwill wrote:thg was again the key player, IMO. He went after EPP on Day 1 for no good reason, but he later pushed for PFIDC. How he got that I'll never know.
If you have any specific questions, I'll answer them.
Thanks again for playing.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
-. .- -. / ... ..- -.-. -.- ...newarenanow wrote:What are the results of these experiments.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 22,691
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:57 pm
- Location: Source, Destination, Protocol, Port, size, sequence number, check sum... Yep, that about covers it.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
hey, there's a thread with that title...redwill wrote:-. .- -. / ... ..- -.-. -.- ...newarenanow wrote:What are the results of these experiments.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
perhaps. But the way slappy died the next night when he had been 2nd number of votes seemed to suggest the vote had struck blood, and indeed it had. But at the time of your vote, no.ExPatriatePen wrote:I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
"Apathy is the glove into which evil slips its hand."ExPatriatePen wrote:I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 22,691
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:57 pm
- Location: Source, Destination, Protocol, Port, size, sequence number, check sum... Yep, that about covers it.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Not disputing that... I just think the hubris, from certain posters, is a "bit over the top". THG had an axe to grind with me and admitted the only reason he went after me was because he didn't like the way I had played the prior game. SDD got lucky seeing me that night which sealed my fate.relantel wrote:perhaps. But the way slappy died the next night when he had been 2nd number of votes seemed to suggest the vote had struck blood, and indeed it had. But at the time of your vote, no.ExPatriatePen wrote:I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
Had NAN or you Rel been the original "baddie" there's a good chance the game would have turned out significantly different.
In fact, when Redwill sent me my PM, I actually sent him a note of apologies about how the game was going to play out. I actually thought about declining the role (in the best interest of the game) but I don't know how Redwill would have handled that.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 22,691
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:57 pm
- Location: Source, Destination, Protocol, Port, size, sequence number, check sum... Yep, that about covers it.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
Which would have implicated NAN every bit as much as it did me.thehockeyguru wrote:"Apathy is the glove into which evil slips its hand."ExPatriatePen wrote:I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
EPP, that's the breaks. But I suspect had I been the red, after being red when thg was most recently seer two games ago, I suspect I would have been in his crosshairs too.ExPatriatePen wrote:Not disputing that... I just think the hubris, from certain posters, is a "bit over the top". THG had an axe to grind with me and admitted the only reason he went after me was because he didn't like the way I had played the prior game. SDD got lucky seeing me that night which sealed my fate.relantel wrote:perhaps. But the way slappy died the next night when he had been 2nd number of votes seemed to suggest the vote had struck blood, and indeed it had. But at the time of your vote, no.ExPatriatePen wrote:I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
Had NAN or you Rel been the original "baddie" there's a good chance the game would have turned out significantly different.
In fact, when Redwill sent me my PM, I actually sent him a note of apologies about how the game was going to play out. I actually thought about declining the role (in the best interest of the game) but I don't know how Redwill would have handled that.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
ExPatriatePen wrote:Which would have implicated NAN every bit as much as it did me.thehockeyguru wrote:"Apathy is the glove into which evil slips its hand."ExPatriatePen wrote:I never even made a single comment until long after the bandwagon had started on me. So anyone who says they "knew" I was red is blowing smoke.
Yeah, Canaan led that charge and almost succeeded. Someone I believe it was Krafster mentioned about your defence. It didn't help your cause at all and further made you a target. I had no problem with how you played last game, but I knew brining it up would definitely help my cause which was to get rid of you.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
In a game this small it makes it a lot easier to find Red's. Less players to have to eliminate as possibilities.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 22,691
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:57 pm
- Location: Source, Destination, Protocol, Port, size, sequence number, check sum... Yep, that about covers it.
Re: *** Experiment #3 Game Thread ***
The larger point being it was complete "shot in the dark" in which you luckily hit your target. Not a result of any particular skill.