Because obviously redwill was claimed by teh columbia, but that literally might have been the perfect instance to throw that out there.
I'm concerned now with letting thehammer lead the charge. Mac, what have you got?
As I have continually stated, I don't care which direction we go as long as we go after one of the three people yet-to-be-cleared as originally red. If PS87 or Redwill suggests going after Gaucho or Willie instead, then I'm on board with switching off Mac, but Mac's desperation tells me he is the final original red as does his laying low versus Willlie and Gaucho's incessant participation.
Is Malk now not cleared as an original red? I would think the only way he would show blue is if he is a recruit-red, so I say we leave him go until we go through the other three.
The only way the reds can win is if the village goes on a recruit-chasing hunt.
I assume the only counter argument is that there is only one recruit left and it's me trying to kill the three blues. If that's the case, there would still be 4 left after we got through those three, and you could go 3-1 against me.
You've beat the dead horse, but if you try and kill me it's a waste of a night. It makes sense for the agenda you're pushing though, because it buys you another night plus doesn't narrow the chances of getting a "recruited" red. What are the chances there is only one red left and it is the recruited one?
You've beat the dead horse, but if you try and kill me it's a waste of a night. It makes sense for the agenda you're pushing though, because it buys you another night plus doesn't narrow the chances of getting a "recruited" red. What are the chances there is only one red left and it is the recruited one?
If there is only one red left and he is a recruited red, then the village is in better shape than my argument posits because it doesn't even need to kill the original red. It would go Mac, Gaucho, Willie - the Reds would go Good Guy, Good Guy - that would leave three good guys and me. You could just kill me at that point, if you think that I'm pushing this agenda.
All I'm saying is you're not 100% cleared either but you are acting like you are
Well, if the supposed "recruiting" happened before I was cleared, the only thing is that IF instance of not being able to be seen.
Right. So do you have a counter theory about redwill? If redwill is to be trusted it's very plausible the red recruit would come back blue.
lol my theory was if that's the case then that's a game breaker for the bads, and the village is doomed. Which is largely why I don't think that would happen.
Not that I necessarily think this, but couldn't redwill have been recruited by columbia and then again by the reds? In UFO Warz someone was recruited twice.
Not that I necessarily think this, but couldn't redwill have been recruited by columbia and then again by the reds? In UFO Warz someone was recruited twice.
That would be weird and also a gamebreaker, IMO since redwill and Columbia were still talking after night 5.
All I'm saying is you're not 100% cleared either but you are acting like you are
Well, if the supposed "recruiting" happened before I was cleared, the only thing is that IF instance of not being able to be seen.
Right. So do you have a counter theory about redwill? If redwill is to be trusted it's very plausible the red recruit would come back blue.
lol my theory was if that's the case then that's a game breaker for the bads, and the village is doomed. Which is largely why I don't think that would happen.
But is it really any different from other games with this angle? I just think we need to keep our options open.
The fact that Malka might possibly come back blue like me is irrelevant right now. I was just putting it out there for your information.
There has to be one more non-recruit red. The numbers dictate it. Hammer is right that we need to worry about getting that red now and worry about getting any red recruit later.