Sounds like the tribe has spoken, I will switch back to Horvat.Troy Loney wrote:yeah, i was hoping the granlund debacle would prevent this from happening again.Kraftster wrote:I think under the rules, the outcome has to be orpchar owns Horvat.
I don't understand why this should not be enforced. It shouldn't be the other owners' responsibility to keep track of everyone else's' rookies. There is no reason the google doc can't stand as official record when every one of us has access to it. Unless we move to a league where keepers are tracked on site, I see no problems with this set-up.Kraftster wrote:I was pretty sure that we were holding people to their google docs as a rule. I wasn't a fan of the rule, but I think that is the rule.
I think it's that guys like Horvat and Granlund aren't on my radar because I knew that they had been drafted before. And I don't think it's we're targeting players being mismanaged, but that it's just a lucky stumble and sort of provides an advantage for owners to not pay as close attention to everything.Pitts wrote:I don't understand why this should not be enforced. It shouldn't be the other owners' responsibility to keep track of everyone else's' rookies. There is no reason the google doc can't stand as official record when every one of us has access to it. Unless we move to a league where keepers are tracked on site, I see no problems with this set-up.Kraftster wrote:I was pretty sure that we were holding people to their google docs as a rule. I wasn't a fan of the rule, but I think that is the rule.
Well for one the repetitive draft picks. It isn't that hard to do a find within the sheet for the 2014 Draft and Keepers. Anyone not on either of those lists should be sent back into the FA pool.Letang Is The Truth wrote:who doesnt use the google doc?
This tooTroy Loney wrote:I think it's that guys like Horvat and Granlund aren't on my radar because I knew that they had been drafted before. And I don't think it's we're targeting players being mismanaged, but that it's just a lucky stumble and sort of provides an advantage for owners to not pay as close attention to everything.Pitts wrote:I don't understand why this should not be enforced. It shouldn't be the other owners' responsibility to keep track of everyone else's' rookies. There is no reason the google doc can't stand as official record when every one of us has access to it. Unless we move to a league where keepers are tracked on site, I see no problems with this set-up.Kraftster wrote:I was pretty sure that we were holding people to their google docs as a rule. I wasn't a fan of the rule, but I think that is the rule.
Well, I agree to an extent. When Horvat was picked, it rang a bell with me. But, I searched the google pages, 2014 draft and 2014 keepers and he wasn't there. So, I figured he was available. But, orpchar is new to the league, so he had no basis to assume Horvat was a retained rookie. He wasn't TARGETING anything.Kraftster wrote:This tooTroy Loney wrote:I think it's that guys like Horvat and Granlund aren't on my radar because I knew that they had been drafted before. And I don't think it's we're targeting players being mismanaged, but that it's just a lucky stumble and sort of provides an advantage for owners to not pay as close attention to everything.Pitts wrote:I don't understand why this should not be enforced. It shouldn't be the other owners' responsibility to keep track of everyone else's' rookies. There is no reason the google doc can't stand as official record when every one of us has access to it. Unless we move to a league where keepers are tracked on site, I see no problems with this set-up.Kraftster wrote:I was pretty sure that we were holding people to their google docs as a rule. I wasn't a fan of the rule, but I think that is the rule.
Definitely not targeting anything/anyone, and like I said it would've been no problem to change my pick, but the more I thought about that, there's nothing keeping someone else from calling tough **** several picks later, and then THEY get Horvat instead of me or Malk. And when a rule is explicitly stated in the league document and has a precedent of being enforced, you have to continue enforcing it.Pitts wrote:He wasn't TARGETING anything.
Well thankfully, I follow the rules of if it's not on the 2014 keeper or draft he's free game.orpchar wrote:Definitely not targeting anything/anyone, and like I said it would've been no problem to change my pick, but the more I thought about that, there's nothing keeping someone else from calling tough **** several picks later, and then THEY get Horvat instead of me or Malk. And when a rule is explicitly stated in the league document and has a precedent of being enforced, you have to continue enforcing it.Pitts wrote:He wasn't TARGETING anything.
One might say the standard is the standard.
