You're just play oddly, man. Look at the way you got k-lined out of the last redwill game. I went back and read everything in this game and you're the only one that jumps out to me as almost positively red (and I'm not the only one that thinks so, it seems). I'm probably putting too much stock in the roster omission (you were literally an afterthought) and I need a little more convincing to get over it. That and you really just seem to have it our for me, not sure why. It's so relentless it makes me feel like you're covering for something.
MRandall25 wrote:
Get over yourself.
Why? I like me.
To be completely clear, I like you as a poster. Both in and outside of the Warz. I had fun arguing with you today and I enjoy reading your contributions in other threads.
I have to agree with MRandall here....WK has been playing these games for a long time. It strikes me as odd that he would cast forth the theory that there was something more to that kill, such as a setup or silencing someone, especially for a normal villager kill. He doesn't strike me as the type that would normally read that much into an early game kill.
Crankshaft and shafnutz seemed to be all over the place on day 1. However, the ones that come off as really suspicious to me were the ones that stretched the day 1 vote out - shafnutz, MIMH, and yourself. We had 6 players get voted on before anyone was doubled up. It's early on, so my suspicious list is still a bit large.
The more I think about it, the less it makes to vote people off on Day 1 just for the heck of it. But I guess that's another discussion for another game.
The more I think about it, the less it makes to vote people off on Day 1 just for the heck of it. But I guess that's another discussion for another game.
I agree. I think patience and information gathering would lead to smarter day 1 votes, but would also run into issues with time constraints.
I have to agree with MRandall here....WK has been playing these games for a long time. It strikes me as odd that he would cast forth the theory that there was something more to that kill, such as a setup or silencing someone, especially for a normal villager kill. He doesn't strike me as the type that would normally read that much into an early game kill.
LOL - You're so red. What a ridiculous attempt to get a vote going on me.
I think that we can look at anyone that went along with a bandwagon vote. Bigmck voted for dodint and then was the last vote on Doc. That's my choice for today right now.
I have to agree with MRandall here....WK has been playing these games for a long time. It strikes me as odd that he would cast forth the theory that there was something more to that kill, such as a setup or silencing someone, especially for a normal villager kill. He doesn't strike me as the type that would normally read that much into an early game kill.
LOL - You're so red. What a ridiculous attempt to get a vote going on me.
Does anyone else think this post is equally strange? I put forth a 2nd day vote, offering my theory using the very limited evidence we have thus far. Why does me casting a vote for you make me "so red"? Misguided, sure, but solely by my voting for you, you believe I'm red?
My early vote on dodint was based on him right out the gate trying to kill me before I even had logged in. My move to Doc was to get enough votes to move things along. There wasn't enough support to move away from Doc to even try.
Misguided, sure, but solely by my voting for you, you believe I'm red?
Yep. You know exactly what you are doing - trying to grab on to MRandall's (weak) idea to get a vote going on me.
"I know exactly what I'm doing"? Well yes, I do. I just found it odd that you of all players tried to read that much into that particular night killing. If anything, it's "red" to immediately try and lend credence to that theory immediately once the day phase starts, especially if it means deflecting any potential heat away from yourself.
Your over-the-top reaction of being convinced I am red is puzzling, however.