*** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
Doesn't seem...
likeagoodwaytowinoverotherpeople
Especially. when...
you'rethepersonwiththevotes.
Lynch dodint
likeagoodwaytowinoverotherpeople
Especially. when...
you'rethepersonwiththevotes.
Lynch dodint
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I'm seriously debating on voting for you for doing that Shatner bit...
...but I wont
...but I wont
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I would think that you had to do it because of some game rule that was PMd to you but you've had a normal post without the Shatnerisms.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I like to...
havealittlefun
since I don't
reallyknowanythingabout
Star. Trek?
havealittlefun
since I don't
reallyknowanythingabout
Star. Trek?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I think Darth Spock is Jim's Uncle....or something...
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
You're voting for someone with no information while complaining that I'm willing to bandwagon against someone else? That's brilliant, mate.MRandall25 wrote:
Lynch dodint
I don't have a particular feeling for anyone and I thought his reasoning was compelling. I know I have nothing to hide (same as two games ago) so I know your vote is just drivel/bandwagon.
tase slappybrown bro
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
...but I might.PensFanInDC wrote:I'm seriously debating on voting for you for doing that Shatner bit...

-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I can get behind a dodint vote right now.
zap dodint
zap dodint
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
People usually can. 

-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
You...dodint wrote:You're voting for someone with no information while complaining that I'm willing to bandwagon against someone else? That's brilliant, mate.MRandall25 wrote:
Lynch dodint
I don't have a particular feeling for anyone and I thought his reasoning was compelling. I know I have nothing to hide (same as two games ago) so I know your vote is just drivel/bandwagon.
tase slappybrown bro
have2votesonyou
Perhaps...
somebodyknowssomething?
Don't. Take. This. Soseriously.
And I voted...
becauseyoulatchedtosomeoneelse'ssuspicionsinsteadofyourown.
Makes you look...
alittlesuspicious.
Seems like...
you'retryingtobehelpful.
But. In reality... It does. not. lookthatway.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
Especially since you don't have the Merit of ValorBenny Fitz wrote:I can get behind a dodint vote right now.
zap dodint

-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
So we don't know what role Spock was? He was in the medical bay so maybe Angel? However, McCoy is the medical officer so that wouldn't make as much sense.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I'm not worried. As a redshirt I'm cannon fodder anyway, we're supposed to die.
The fact that he doesn't stand behind his own reasoning by voting is more suspicious than anything. Look to that in the future.
The fact that he doesn't stand behind his own reasoning by voting is more suspicious than anything. Look to that in the future.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
The fact that I don't vote right now is suspicious? I put a theory out to see what other people thought. It's possible that I missed something that someone else saw that could discredit my theory. Nothing wrong with seeing what the village has to say before going all 

-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
Oh, a gif? I guess nothing happened. Cool.
Am I dead yet?
Am I dead yet?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I think dodint and PFIDC are both bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I agree with...
pifidck.
It's more suspicious...
thatyouimmediatelylatched
to his theory.
pifidck.
It's more suspicious...
thatyouimmediatelylatched
to his theory.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
This should surprise no one.slappybrown wrote:I think dodint and PFIDC are both bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
Well, to be fair, you two do go together naturally.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I was thinking the exact same thing.slappybrown wrote:I think dodint and PFIDC are both bad.
lynch dodint
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I don't think pdifc is red since he switched off of MIMH. That would be too much of a tell if he knew he was red. I think Bigmk is a better choice for ditching the bandwagon to go after WK with a very vague explanation.
Zap BigMk
Color please
Zap BigMk
Color please
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Zap PDIFC
I feel like his reasoning for his vote is just a cover so he can later say he wasn't on the bandwagon vote.
I take it this is a joke?Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:I don't think pdifc is red since he switched off of MIMH. That would be too much of a tell if he knew he was red. I think Bigmk is a better choice for ditching the bandwagon to go after WK with a very vague explanation.
PFIDC was red yesterday because he switched off MIMH and he's not red today because he switched off MIMH?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
That is curious.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
I suppose things changed in SDD's mind when MIMH turned up red. Just thought of that.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: *** STAR TREK WARZ III *** Game Thread
It is, however he has more information now (MiMH was red) then he did in the last day phase.