Crosby, most definitely 15 years, Malkin, although he's my boy i'd like to see a bit more first, Fleury, although he improved quite a bit last year I agree with you on the inconsistency and I would like to see quite a bit more of his play before signing him to a potential long term.bh wrote:Sid and Malkin I would. I don't know about MAF. Like Jim said he doesn't always instill a lot of confidence. I think a big part of it is that he always has a piss poor defense in front of him. Sometimes he seems really "on" and other days he's really "off". another year will give us a much better indication which way he is heading.Jimmy66 wrote:Would you sign a player to a 15 yr contract?mikey287 wrote:Off the top of their head, does anyone know who Fleury's agent is? Whoever it is, he has been reasonable in the past, look at the contract he's currently on, he knows we need him...I think we'll be fine with Fleury...I'm hoping Fleury wants a DiPietro style contract, I wouldn't hesitate to give him a long, long-term deal...
Did MAF turn something down?
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:25 pm
- Location: Calgary, AB
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 8:32 pm
- Location: Chicago
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,840
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:04 am
ESPN Radio 1250 ran some Shero sound during one of their news breaks today. Shero said he hasn't talked to Fleury's agent in a while (I think he said a month) and he didn't sound like it was a front burner issue for him right now. He said something along the lines of maybe we'll get to it before the season, maybe not. We'll see.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,113
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:40 pm
- Location: NYC
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,912
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:41 pm
- Location: monroeville