Doesn't sound like a very exciting candidate. I also see he has received zero votes on this poll, so that's that

What Leaf Buddies are you referencing?bse wrote: Sat May 03, 2025 10:40 amI just hope that Dubas doesn't go for his Leafs' buddies this time.
He brought Keefe up from Soo to the Marlies, then to the Leafs. Keefe's coaching the Devils though and didn't seem like a nepotism hire, really.
Tortorella for this org would be good only under very specific circumstances. It would have to be for a very short term. One full season at the VERY most. He's a guy you can bring in to hold a reign of terror and whip a team up to a one-off performance run. Any damage his style of coaching and personality does, is limited by the term he's around for and you might legitimately get something out of it.dark_forces wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:00 pmI think the only coach who falls into the "NHL coaching retread" category that would have a chance is Tocchet. Though Quinn sort of falls into this category, I don't think we'll see him stick around unless the new coach specifically wants him. Right off the bat, we can exclude Laviolette, Tortorella, Quenneville, etc.
Disagree. He is what this team NEEDED. Does not need him moving forward.Cow_Master66 wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:20 pmI'd be shocked if they even entertained talking to Torts. He is exactly what this team needs - someone who would bench the lug-head Dmen - but I don't think they would ever seriously consider him.
Putting Torts behind the bench would have been a good move start of last season. Or the one before that. Try and short circuit something and jump start towards the playoffs.FLPensFan wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:57 pmDisagree. He is what this team NEEDED. Does not need him moving forward.Cow_Master66 wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:20 pmI'd be shocked if they even entertained talking to Torts. He is exactly what this team needs - someone who would bench the lug-head Dmen - but I don't think they would ever seriously consider him.
Torts tends to have a short lifespan. Torts typically tends to find a way to alienate 1 or 2 of a teams best young players. Last thing we need is to bring in Torts to focus on the geriatric players on their way out and pissing off what little skilled youth we have.
Honestly, I never want to see Torts behind the Pittsburgh bench. How many times does the same or similar result need to play out? Same with Laviolette. Things ended in Washington pretty much the same way they ended in New York. It makes me wonder why anyone hires these guys anymore. They must think: "it'll be different here!" We all know how this story ends. You're better off giving someone a fresh start, or at least someone whose story is still being written.Puck-Lurker wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 1:41 pmPutting Torts behind the bench would have been a good move start of last season. Or the one before that. Try and short circuit something and jump start towards the playoffs.FLPensFan wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:57 pmDisagree. He is what this team NEEDED. Does not need him moving forward.Cow_Master66 wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:20 pmI'd be shocked if they even entertained talking to Torts. He is exactly what this team needs - someone who would bench the lug-head Dmen - but I don't think they would ever seriously consider him.
Torts tends to have a short lifespan. Torts typically tends to find a way to alienate 1 or 2 of a teams best young players. Last thing we need is to bring in Torts to focus on the geriatric players on their way out and pissing off what little skilled youth we have.
I say good, meaning for the team and in the short term. Would still have hated it personally
But that path is blocked now. We've moved on further into rebuild land. Torts is all kinds of wrong for that.
I'm fully aware of Keefe, but he's not available. That's why I asked which one of his "buddies" would qualify. Additionally, most GMs hire based on past relationships. Its not a prerequisite but it should eliminated that person.Puck-Lurker wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:01 pmHe brought Keefe up from Soo to the Marlies, then to the Leafs. Keefe's coaching the Devils though and didn't seem like a nepotism hire, really.
Tortorella for this org would be good only under very specific circumstances. It would have to be for a very short term. One full season at the VERY most. He's a guy you can bring in to hold a reign of terror and whip a team up to a one-off performance run. Any damage his style of coaching and personality does, is limited by the term he's around for and you might legitimately get something out of it.dark_forces wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:00 pmI think the only coach who falls into the "NHL coaching retread" category that would have a chance is Tocchet. Though Quinn sort of falls into this category, I don't think we'll see him stick around unless the new coach specifically wants him. Right off the bat, we can exclude Laviolette, Tortorella, Quenneville, etc.
Long term, I think he's something of a poison for a locker room and your team's optics. Small doses of poison can be useful, prolongued exposure not so much.
Whatever you think of Sullivan, he was quite professional and always spoke respectfully about his players in interviews and whatnot. Torts just can't help himself. There's no reason to think Dubas would ever hire him though.
Oof. He was my preferred choiceFLPensFan wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 3:40 pmDavid Carle is out. Signed an extension with University of Denver per Chris Johnston.
Dubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
I totally agree with you since he has shown a definite tendency towards players, staff, etc that he has some existing tie to.
Ok, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.bse wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 9:17 amDubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
I could understand if that GM has success, but he really didn't have much success in Toronto compared to the expectations.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 11:02 amOk, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.bse wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 9:17 amDubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
What GM ever had success in Toronto?Daniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 4:06 pmI could understand if that GM has success, but he really didn't have much success in Toronto compared to the expectations.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 11:02 amOk, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.bse wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 9:17 amDubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
You're right. He's a dark horse candidate, and definitely viable.KG wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 1:13 pmRoss and others speculating that Manny Malhotra fits the mold of a HC Dubas is looking for. Former player, young, current AHL head coach, former NHL assistant (Toronto, Vancouver). Yes Dubas knows him. Would think he would at least get an interview.
Toronto Maple LeafsDaniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 4:06 pmI could understand if that GM has success, but he really didn't have much success in Toronto compared to the expectations.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 11:02 amOk, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.bse wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 9:17 amDubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
2019-20 - lost qualifying roundGunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 5:08 pmToronto Maple LeafsDaniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 4:06 pmI could understand if that GM has success, but he really didn't have much success in Toronto compared to the expectations.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 11:02 amOk, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.bse wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 9:17 amDubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
5 years before GMKD = .513
5 years with GMKD = .641
So, where is the lack of success here?
This is Toronto Holmes. They never win so regular season success is all they’ve ever been measured by. Plus 2 of year before he arrives we’re below .500. The truth is they were better after he took over and also set them up very well with where they are right now.Daniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 5:52 pm2019-20 - lost qualifying roundGunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 5:08 pmToronto Maple LeafsDaniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 4:06 pmI could understand if that GM has success, but he really didn't have much success in Toronto compared to the expectations.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 11:02 amOk, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.bse wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 9:17 am
Dubas has hired or signed at least ten or more people to various positions who had been workimg for or alongside him in Toronto. Not nepotism, but kind of a country club atmosphere. I want fresh faces and voices, not only familiar ones.
5 years before GMKD = .513
5 years with GMKD = .641
So, where is the lack of success here?
2020-21 - lost in the 1st round
2021-22 = lost in the 1st round
2022-23 - wait.....won the 1st round, lost in the second
As Penguins fan used to their recent history that 1st round win does look like success.![]()
Seriously, is the regular season really how hockey teams determine success? If Toronto had no lack of success, why did Sheldon Keefe even get fired ?
I guess if we want the Penguins to become the Steelers, keep bring Dubas' proxies in and measure success by the regular season.
They were better and had some success, but not enough to warrant bringing in everyone you know from Toronto. I get Spezza and I get key people here and there, but I think if Pittsburgh becomes Toronto south we'll see the same results.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 8:53 pmThis is Toronto Holmes. They never win so regular season success is all they’ve ever been measured by. Plus 2 of year before he arrives we’re below .500. The truth is they were better after he took over and also set them up very well with where they are right now.Daniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 5:52 pm2019-20 - lost qualifying roundGunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 5:08 pmToronto Maple LeafsDaniel wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 4:06 pmI could understand if that GM has success, but he really didn't have much success in Toronto compared to the expectations.Gunnerfan wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 11:02 am
Ok, but this is every GM in every sport. It's about trust at that level, so you should hire people you trust for the most important openings.
5 years before GMKD = .513
5 years with GMKD = .641
So, where is the lack of success here?
2020-21 - lost in the 1st round
2021-22 = lost in the 1st round
2022-23 - wait.....won the 1st round, lost in the second
As Penguins fan used to their recent history that 1st round win does look like success.![]()
Seriously, is the regular season really how hockey teams determine success? If Toronto had no lack of success, why did Sheldon Keefe even get fired ?
I guess if we want the Penguins to become the Steelers, keep bring Dubas' proxies in and measure success by the regular season.
Gallant too. Stay away from him please. I do not want any retreads.dark_forces wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:00 pmI think the only coach who falls into the "NHL coaching retread" category that would have a chance is Tocchet. Though Quinn sort of falls into this category, I don't think we'll see him stick around unless the new coach specifically wants him. Right off the bat, we can exclude Laviolette, Tortorella, Quenneville, etc.
Yes, I forgot about him. Stay away. None of these guys seems to last anywhere for very long. BUT they keep getting hired over and over again.pronovost19 wrote: Wed May 07, 2025 9:10 amGallant too. Stay away from him please. I do not want any retreads.dark_forces wrote: Mon May 05, 2025 12:00 pmI think the only coach who falls into the "NHL coaching retread" category that would have a chance is Tocchet. Though Quinn sort of falls into this category, I don't think we'll see him stick around unless the new coach specifically wants him. Right off the bat, we can exclude Laviolette, Tortorella, Quenneville, etc.
Not really a fan of any of these guys.. I hope we dig a bit deeperdark_forces wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 4:44 pmYou're right. He's a dark horse candidate, and definitely viable.KG wrote: Tue May 06, 2025 1:13 pmRoss and others speculating that Manny Malhotra fits the mold of a HC Dubas is looking for. Former player, young, current AHL head coach, former NHL assistant (Toronto, Vancouver). Yes Dubas knows him. Would think he would at least get an interview.
I keep coming back to Bannister and Blashill as well. I just don't see a current college coach being brought in.
These coaches are the ones that stand out to me as Dubas-type candidates.