sry. i got the vote in and went for it. i didnt want anyone complaining that the game was taking too long :cough:newarenanow wrote:Then let's go for beerman.IrishEyes wrote:I still say it's beerman... I don't know why...Kovy27 wrote:Because you are not the wolf...obviously.IrishEyes wrote:Dude, what are you doing? I'm trying to be all sacrificing, and you're changing your vote.Kovy27 wrote:Lynch NAN
You suck.
Lynch beerman
lol. i saw enough votes and i did the deed. dont hate on me because you yucks are casually casting votes to murder your fellow villagers. think before you vote next time.Kovy27 wrote:I changed mine like 2 seconds later! She wouldn't have been to the gallows that quickly. DIRTY!canaan wrote:there was enough votes.Kovy27 wrote:Canaan Cheated.
nom nom
That's a flaw of the game. I had complaints with that in the previous one...I hate that, as soon as it's majority, boom...that's it. There's no closing arguments.canaan wrote:there was enough votes.Kovy27 wrote:Canaan Cheated.
Are you not dead?bhaw wrote:If there were "closing arguments," the game would take weeks because you'd have to wait for the person to come on and say something. Then if they did manage to sway people, you have to go through the whole thing over again. Once you have majority, it should be done for the sake of not taking a month to complete.
if people took a more calculated approach to the game, then they wouldn't have to change their votes six times. sure, there are times when someone makes a compelling defense, but for the most part, for all three games, people are just throwing poo at the wall and hoping, instead of actually thinking.jaysmiter wrote:That's a flaw of the game. I had complaints with that in the previous one...I hate that, as soon as it's majority, boom...that's it. There's no closing arguments.canaan wrote:there was enough votes.Kovy27 wrote:Canaan Cheated.
Not your fault, Canaan. You didn't design the game. It just has it's flaws in it's current state. We could always alter the rules next game...the rules aren't written in stone.
I was never alive. Canaan refused to acknowledge my existence this game.Kovy27 wrote:Are you not dead?bhaw wrote:If there were "closing arguments," the game would take weeks because you'd have to wait for the person to come on and say something. Then if they did manage to sway people, you have to go through the whole thing over again. Once you have majority, it should be done for the sake of not taking a month to complete.
Well, it could simply be a timed affair. You have 5 minutes after the last vote was cast to attempt to change your fate. I don't know...we could work on it. Maybe not.bhaw wrote:If there were "closing arguments," the game would take weeks because you'd have to wait for the person to come on and say something. Then if they did manage to sway people, you have to go through the whole thing over again. Once you have majority, it should be done for the sake of not taking a month to complete.
weird. an empty post.bhaw wrote:I was never alive. Canaan refused to acknowledge my existence this game.Kovy27 wrote:Are you not dead?bhaw wrote:If there were "closing arguments," the game would take weeks because you'd have to wait for the person to come on and say something. Then if they did manage to sway people, you have to go through the whole thing over again. Once you have majority, it should be done for the sake of not taking a month to complete.
Fair enough. (post-count agreement)canaan wrote:if people took a more calculated approach to the game, then they wouldn't have to change their votes six times. sure, there are times when someone makes a compelling defense, but for the most part, for all three games, people are just throwing poo at the wall and hoping, instead of actually thinking.jaysmiter wrote:That's a flaw of the game. I had complaints with that in the previous one...I hate that, as soon as it's majority, boom...that's it. There's no closing arguments.canaan wrote:there was enough votes.Kovy27 wrote:Canaan Cheated.
Not your fault, Canaan. You didn't design the game. It just has it's flaws in it's current state. We could always alter the rules next game...the rules aren't written in stone.
my problem is that people want the game to progress instead of actually playing as a team and figuring out whos who. people are selfish. they would rather stay til the end and not win, instead of playing to win.
Completely agree, it seems as soon as someone gets eaten somebody throws out a name and most everybody votes that way just to get the game moving (I'm guilty of it) and as soon as someone isn't around for 3 hours your automatically suspicious for not posting.canaan wrote:if people took a more calculated approach to the game, then they wouldn't have to change their votes six times. sure, there are times when someone makes a compelling defense, but for the most part, for all three games, people are just throwing poo at the wall and hoping, instead of actually thinking.jaysmiter wrote:That's a flaw of the game. I had complaints with that in the previous one...I hate that, as soon as it's majority, boom...that's it. There's no closing arguments.canaan wrote:there was enough votes.Kovy27 wrote:Canaan Cheated.
Not your fault, Canaan. You didn't design the game. It just has it's flaws in it's current state. We could always alter the rules next game...the rules aren't written in stone.
my problem is that people want the game to progress instead of actually playing as a team and figuring out whos who. people are selfish. they would rather stay til the end and not win, instead of playing to win.
