*** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
To quote Rylan: But why should we keep you?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
I should also add that Rylan posted "I am suspicious of shafnutz" and columbia voted to lynch me within a minute of each other, at the end of page 5/beginning of page 6. Again, just throwing things out there.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,118
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:33 pm
- Location: 39°6′32″N 76°46′17″W
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Assuming you're a villager.columbia wrote:To quote Rylan: But why should we keep you?

-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
This argument makes no sense. What am I supposed to do here, role claim something? I'm blue. I'm actually trying to make analyses and plays off of documented patterns of play, and I'm getting bandwagoned for being overly active.columbia wrote:To quote Rylan: But why should we keep you?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
You're assumption would be correct.DocEmrick wrote:Assuming you're a villager.columbia wrote:To quote Rylan: But why should we keep you?

-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
That's an interesting defense, as you went after me for.....being active.shafnutz05 wrote:This argument makes no sense. What am I supposed to do here, role claim something? I'm blue. I'm actually trying to make analyses and plays off of documented patterns of play, and I'm getting bandwagoned for being overly active.columbia wrote:To quote Rylan: But why should we keep you?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Ok, so by being blue you are neither an asset nor an enemy, thus expendable.shafnutz05 wrote:This argument makes no sense. What am I supposed to do here, role claim something? I'm blue. I'm actually trying to make analyses and plays off of documented patterns of play, and I'm getting bandwagoned for being overly active.columbia wrote:To quote Rylan: But why should we keep you?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
columbia wrote:That's an interesting defense, as you went after me for.....being active.

No, hardly. I don't go after people for being active. I went after you because you are doing the same exact thing you did when you were red in the last game. As the seer, I outed Slappybrown early in the last game. Immediately, you aligned yourself beside me and offered praise/kudos. This game, you are doing the same thing with redwill.
I want people to be active, so I would never go after someone merely for that. That's how you end up with Warz games where everyone is afraid to talk.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
For the record, not jumping you cause you are active, jumping you because of a few comments.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Comments that I have made in most warz games, and never (or rarely) when I was red?Rylan wrote:For the record, not jumping you cause you are active, jumping you because of a few comments.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4,264
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Damn the Man! Save the Empire!
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
I don't know if Shaf and columbia are going after each other on purpose, and they're both red, or one's red, or both are blue... but right now, I'm not sure I like the vote for either of them.
@mac... why'd you vote for Rylan? I was leaning that way before I saw your vote, but I don't really have a reason as to why. Just wondering if you had one.
tar and feather Rylan
@mac... why'd you vote for Rylan? I was leaning that way before I saw your vote, but I don't really have a reason as to why. Just wondering if you had one.
tar and feather Rylan
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,135
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:50 pm
- Location: Waiting for the write-up...
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
tar and feather columbia
Gonna go with shaft's reasoning since redwill doesn't have anything.
Gonna go with shaft's reasoning since redwill doesn't have anything.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
I believe Shad
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
So you have made them when you were a red. Defeating your own defense.shafnutz05 wrote:Comments that I have made in most warz games, and never (or rarely) when I was red?Rylan wrote:For the record, not jumping you cause you are active, jumping you because of a few comments.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Rylan is offering some extremely convoluted logic right now.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Everyone at one point was and will be red. It's impossible to not "defeat your own defense."Rylan wrote:So you have made them when you were a red. Defeating your own defense.shafnutz05 wrote:Comments that I have made in most warz games, and never (or rarely) when I was red?Rylan wrote:For the record, not jumping you cause you are active, jumping you because of a few comments.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
I'll get more work done this week, if you do that.Zarovich wrote:tar and feather columbia
Gonna go with shaft's reasoning since redwill doesn't have anything.
But you won't get any further by whacking me.
Maybe the same is true of shad.....We'll see eventually.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,118
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 6:33 pm
- Location: 39°6′32″N 76°46′17″W
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
unlynch shad
lynch columbia
lynch columbia
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
The situation here is handling like people are using past experiences to validate themselves. Each game is different and we're not supposed to look at what one person was "last game."
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
That's my point, past actions do not foretell future or present actions. I just wish Redwill would tell us who he looked at.Malkamaniac wrote:Everyone at one point was and will be red. It's impossible to not "defeat your own defense."
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
By that virtue, shafnutz's "reasoning" on me shouldn't be a factor.Malkamaniac wrote:The situation here is handling like people are using past experiences to validate themselves. Each game is different and we're not supposed to look at what one person was "last game."
But it looks to be going that way.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
*rely on past games at your own risk*Bob Cole's Senility wrote:Vote Count:
4 Shaf-(columbia, ulf, Rylan, twc)
3 Columbia-(shaf, zaro, doc)
2 Rylan (mac, IE)
12 to tar and feather
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Purely based on this situation? I'm willing to bet that Shad won't make those comments again, even if he thinks they are helpful only because there is this bandwagon mentality that refuses to look at the subject matter, and instead are trying to read between the lines. It's early in the game, if Shad is bad, he's going to expose himself(lol) again, or his words will be proved null by any event that happens in the future.
For that, I'm thinking between Rylan and Columbia, moreso Rylan.
For that, I'm thinking between Rylan and Columbia, moreso Rylan.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
just a hunch for the most part. some of his actions stuck out as weird to me and ive never played with him before.IrishEyes wrote:I don't know if Shaf and columbia are going after each other on purpose, and they're both red, or one's red, or both are blue... but right now, I'm not sure I like the vote for either of them.
@mac... why'd you vote for Rylan? I was leaning that way before I saw your vote, but I don't really have a reason as to why. Just wondering if you had one.
tar and feather Rylan
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: *** 1776 Warz Game Thread ***
Which is why right now, I don't think you're bad either.columbia wrote:By that virtue, shafnutz's "reasoning" on me shouldn't be a factor.Malkamaniac wrote:The situation here is handling like people are using past experiences to validate themselves. Each game is different and we're not supposed to look at what one person was "last game."
But it looks to be going that way.