I just have to disagree. Two players weren't cleared - me and Relantel. One player was affiliated with a red and tried to save a red and was cleared way earlier in the game. Kraftster was cleared. I find it hard to believe why every one think Kraft was an obvious choice but wouldn't consider him when Redwill and I were pressing him earlier.MWB wrote:I think you're overstating it. That last vote should have been kraftster. He was the one with the least amount of evidence on his side. People seemed to think shaf could be red when he was seen blue, but people didn't think the same about Kraft.TheHammer24 wrote:. . .
First off - really fun game. I loved it.
Second - Reds had HUGE advantage, which is fine. The village usually has the advantage. I just want people to back off on how it was so "obvious" to then who was whom. That **** pisses me off.
Great game Pavel, and great job by the reds.
Box Office Wars aftermath
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
kraftster's vote on me had me reconsider my vote on shaf. But too late then really.TheHammer24 wrote:I just have to disagree. Two players weren't cleared - me and Relantel. One player was affiliated with a red and tried to save a red and was cleared way earlier in the game. Kraftster was cleared. I find it hard to believe why every one think Kraft was an obvious choice but wouldn't consider him when Redwill and I were pressing him earlier.MWB wrote:I think you're overstating it. That last vote should have been kraftster. He was the one with the least amount of evidence on his side. People seemed to think shaf could be red when he was seen blue, but people didn't think the same about Kraft.TheHammer24 wrote:. . .
First off - really fun game. I loved it.
Second - Reds had HUGE advantage, which is fine. The village usually has the advantage. I just want people to back off on how it was so "obvious" to then who was whom. That **** pisses me off.
Great game Pavel, and great job by the reds.
(Of course, it didn't help that it took me a long time to buy into Hammer's claim.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
This is something else Kraftster did very well. He totally, and accurately, bought Rel's role claim giving hi legitimacy in Rel's eyes, and was able to continue to cast doubt on me the whole game.relantel wrote:
kraftster's vote on me had me reconsider my vote on shaf. But too late then really.
(Of course, it didn't help that it took me a long time to buy into Hammer's claim.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Rel would have made no sense as a red since he was taking shots and missing. I'm not sure how else his role could be explained. Everything you said checked out completely. There being two red masons would make no sense. I'm not saying it was obvious, just that Kraft seemed to have the least evidence to support him as blue. While he was cleared, alpha as blue is fairly routine.TheHammer24 wrote:I just have to disagree. Two players weren't cleared - me and Relantel. One player was affiliated with a red and tried to save a red and was cleared way earlier in the game. Kraftster was cleared. I find it hard to believe why every one think Kraft was an obvious choice but wouldn't consider him when Redwill and I were pressing him earlier.MWB wrote:I think you're overstating it. That last vote should have been kraftster. He was the one with the least amount of evidence on his side. People seemed to think shaf could be red when he was seen blue, but people didn't think the same about Kraft.TheHammer24 wrote:. . .
First off - really fun game. I loved it.
Second - Reds had HUGE advantage, which is fine. The village usually has the advantage. I just want people to back off on how it was so "obvious" to then who was whom. That **** pisses me off.
Great game Pavel, and great job by the reds.
Btw, hammer, you played a great game. I honestly thought you were going to come in at the end and switch.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44,375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
I think it was the first game for me where the alpha came back as blue, so I didn't really have that possibility in mind.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Yeah. To me, the final vote came down to the relative probabilities of the seer being wrong and there being some sort of impotent red kill each night. I went with the latter.Gaucho wrote:I think it was the first game for me where the alpha came back as blue, so I didn't really have that possibility in mind.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,342
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:04 pm
- Location: Wichita, KS
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
The day when TH24 came out with the Highlander stuff was pretty intense. I had to be gone for just a couple of hours and came back to 6-7 pages of debate.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
I was purposely picking people I knew weren't the purple I was looking for. IMO when pavel said you can't post any of the pm received I didn't think there was any way to get the village to kill the person the next day without sounding red or nuts. That's why I was more upset, my strategy was to not look for hammer since I couldn't reference my pm, then it was ok that he did.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Thanks Pavel, that was fun. And educational. Loved the odd roles.
Well played reds.
Well played reds.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,030
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: http://freebitco.in/?r=770437 BITCOINS get them
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Oh that's the other thing about the PM quoting. I nearly insta-killed him but saw there were 2 other pages of convo and Hammer in all his glory was burying himself which is another reason I let the PM quote go on. If THG came in and played the, "I have no idea what this guy is talking about" card Hammer would have died for sure.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4,821
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: beyondauction [16:54:33] you are scammer
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
I really really really wish I hadn't been so busy at work cause this game seemed awesome
I love the independent role, I just knew there was no way I was going to wriggle my way all the way through the game
FU NAN
I love the independent role, I just knew there was no way I was going to wriggle my way all the way through the game
FU NAN
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
That was my plan, but that fact that he copied and pasted the PM made his claim legit.Pavel Bure wrote:Oh that's the other thing about the PM quoting. I nearly insta-killed him but saw there were 2 other pages of convo and Hammer in all his glory was burying himself which is another reason I let the PM quote go on. If THG came in and played the, "I have no idea what this guy is talking about" card Hammer would have died for sure.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
For the record, I think the ban on PM quoting is overblown. I can throw " " around anything I say and claim it's what you said. It's the rule, and I broke it so I apologize to THG. I'm still curious as to what was illegal - the first role claim or the second one where I quoted the resurrection?thehockeyguru wrote:That was my plan, but that fact that he copied and pasted the PM made his claim legit.Pavel Bure wrote:Oh that's the other thing about the PM quoting. I nearly insta-killed him but saw there were 2 other pages of convo and Hammer in all his glory was burying himself which is another reason I let the PM quote go on. If THG came in and played the, "I have no idea what this guy is talking about" card Hammer would have died for sure.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,030
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:15 pm
- Location: http://freebitco.in/?r=770437 BITCOINS get them
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
No you quoted directly the PM the mod sent you. The debacle with that happened in the past where townies quoted their PMs in order to clear themselves because the reds didn't have the same PM. It makes it very easy to clear yourself when you can directly quote a PM. In this instance since it was a completely original role and what you did the couple pages after it I let it go.TheHammer24 wrote:For the record, I think the ban on PM quoting is overblown. I can throw " " around anything I say and claim it's what you said. It's the rule, and I broke it so I apologize to THG. I'm still curious as to what was illegal - the first role claim or the second one where I quoted the resurrection?thehockeyguru wrote:That was my plan, but that fact that he copied and pasted the PM made his claim legit.Pavel Bure wrote:Oh that's the other thing about the PM quoting. I nearly insta-killed him but saw there were 2 other pages of convo and Hammer in all his glory was burying himself which is another reason I let the PM quote go on. If THG came in and played the, "I have no idea what this guy is talking about" card Hammer would have died for sure.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Oh I see.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
No need to apologize, these games are for the purposes of fun and entertainment and this game provided both.TheHammer24 wrote:For the record, I think the ban on PM quoting is overblown. I can throw " " around anything I say and claim it's what you said. It's the rule, and I broke it so I apologize to THG. I'm still curious as to what was illegal - the first role claim or the second one where I quoted the resurrection?thehockeyguru wrote:That was my plan, but that fact that he copied and pasted the PM made his claim legit.Pavel Bure wrote:Oh that's the other thing about the PM quoting. I nearly insta-killed him but saw there were 2 other pages of convo and Hammer in all his glory was burying himself which is another reason I let the PM quote go on. If THG came in and played the, "I have no idea what this guy is talking about" card Hammer would have died for sure.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
thehockeyguru wrote:No need to apologize, these games are for the purposes of fun and entertainment and this game provided both.

-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,231
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 9:28 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
This game was a ton of fun.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Hammer took that all away when he quoted his PM.thehockeyguru wrote:No need to apologize, these games are for the purposes of fun and entertainment and this game provided both.

-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Box Office Wars aftermath
Oh, and I know this is a few days late, but when I wrote almost word for word what rel did, and people started questioning me, that was the worst luck in the world. I can't believe that happened.