this statement really isn't accurate. regardless of whether those earnings stay in the business or not, they are getting taxed at either the corporate level or the personal level. small business owners dont really control what they pay in tax.thehockeyguru wrote:With that being the case, even if you are the owner you are getting a check from the company. So essentially you control what you make (and what you pay in taxes. The remainder of the profits can be held on companies balance sheet in retained earnings.
Stock Market
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,878
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
- Location: Sitting in front of my computer
Re: Stock Market
The only thing they can control is being taxed on the income twice. If the company makes a profit, the profit is being taxed whether it stays in the biz or not.KennyTheKangaroo wrote:this statement really isn't accurate. regardless of whether those earnings stay in the business or not, they are getting taxed at either the corporate level or the personal level. small business owners dont really control what they pay in tax.thehockeyguru wrote:With that being the case, even if you are the owner you are getting a check from the company. So essentially you control what you make (and what you pay in taxes. The remainder of the profits can be held on companies balance sheet in retained earnings.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,516
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Stock Market
Agreed, thats where filing as an "S" corporation comes in. They can control what they pay in tax because they are only taxed at the personal level. They are paid as a shareholder, and as owner you can determine how much that is.pfim wrote:The only thing they can control is being taxed on the income twice. If the company makes a profit, the profit is being taxed whether it stays in the biz or not.KennyTheKangaroo wrote:this statement really isn't accurate. regardless of whether those earnings stay in the business or not, they are getting taxed at either the corporate level or the personal level. small business owners dont really control what they pay in tax.thehockeyguru wrote:With that being the case, even if you are the owner you are getting a check from the company. So essentially you control what you make (and what you pay in taxes. The remainder of the profits can be held on companies balance sheet in retained earnings.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
S Corporation shareholders have no control on how much tax they pay.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,516
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Stock Market
They dont control how much tax they pay, but they control the amount that is directed to them. If you pay 18% personal income tax on up to 200k in earnings and 25% on anything more they can avoid paying more in tax by giving themselves a salary such that they avoid the 25% income bracket.KennyTheKangaroo wrote:S Corporation shareholders have no control on how much tax they pay.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
if they give themselves salary, they are just reducing the net income they would receive on their K-1 and increase the amount they would receive on their W-2. or is kenny the kangaroo missing something here
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,516
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Stock Market
That's where I was mixed up, I was under the impression that when you filed you K-1 that you would not be liable for taxes on what remained in the company as retained earnings. After doing some research I realized that you in fact are liable for the companies income whether it is distributed to you or not.KennyTheKangaroo wrote:if they give themselves salary, they are just reducing the net income they would receive on their K-1 and increase the amount they would receive on their W-2. or is kenny the kangaroo missing something here
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
right
an advantage of an S Corp is that you are allowed to take distributions that are not taxed (they also do not reduce income). the trade off of these distributions are that they reduce your basis in the s-corp. the distributions are kind of a sticky issue with the IRS and congress.
S corporation shareholders usually get cranky when they have to pay a lot of tax on income that they technically did not receive. it happens fairly often.
an advantage of an S Corp is that you are allowed to take distributions that are not taxed (they also do not reduce income). the trade off of these distributions are that they reduce your basis in the s-corp. the distributions are kind of a sticky issue with the IRS and congress.
S corporation shareholders usually get cranky when they have to pay a lot of tax on income that they technically did not receive. it happens fairly often.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,516
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Stock Market
How does it become beneficial to take a distribution that isn't taxed if it reduces your basis? Aren't any funds received over the basis taxed as capital gains?KennyTheKangaroo wrote:right
an advantage of an S Corp is that you are allowed to take distributions that are not taxed (they also do not reduce income). the trade off of these distributions are that they reduce your basis in the s-corp. the distributions are kind of a sticky issue with the IRS and congress.
S corporation shareholders usually get cranky when they have to pay a lot of tax on income that they technically did not receive. it happens fairly often.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
yeah if distributions exceed basis, they are taxed as capital gains. so you just cant take distributions that exceed the amount of income that you have, which isnt very hard because its generally diffacult to take more money out of a business than the business is bringing in.
its beneficial to take a distribution because its tax deferred. you dont pay tax on that money right now. who wouldn't want to take money out of a business and not pay tax? but having a low/no basis in the business can really put you over a barrell when you sell the business.
its beneficial to take a distribution because its tax deferred. you dont pay tax on that money right now. who wouldn't want to take money out of a business and not pay tax? but having a low/no basis in the business can really put you over a barrell when you sell the business.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,516
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: Stock Market
Now I assume things would get really hairy if you were to implement a tax system like Herman Cain is proposing where capitals gains isn't taxed.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
well, thats a good question and there are a lot of different issues w/ capital gains that would need to be adressed.
in other news, the market bounced back today and gold fell 5.47 percent
in other news, the market bounced back today and gold fell 5.47 percent
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Stock Market
When should we expect some relief at the pump with these numbers..?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2,800
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:12 pm
Re: Stock Market
$2.90 heremac5155 wrote:When should we expect some relief at the pump with these numbers..?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Stock Market
When I was over in Jersey it was $3.25.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: Stock Market
Never! Ahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Stock Market
holy ****.. its $3.65 here.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Stock Market
in Columbus? man.. im gonna have to get a tanker and make a road tripFirebird wrote:$2.90 heremac5155 wrote:When should we expect some relief at the pump with these numbers..?

-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2,800
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:12 pm
Re: Stock Market
nah, you have a good memory though!mac5155 wrote:in Columbus? man.. im gonna have to get a tanker and make a road tripFirebird wrote:$2.90 heremac5155 wrote:When should we expect some relief at the pump with these numbers..?
I don't live there anymore.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Stock Market
/stalker 
(i rremember you being an OSU fan.)

(i rremember you being an OSU fan.)
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2,800
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:12 pm
Re: Stock Market
Well at least someone recognizes me and my 600 posts/year average.mac5155 wrote:/stalker
(i rremember you being an OSU fan.)
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7,974
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 9:08 am
Re: Stock Market
Dump your stocks, get to a fixed rate or re-mortgage to a lower fixed rate for your mortgage & pay just the minimum, and pay down your credit cards because this is going to be ugly, real ugly, very soon. There is no way the government can make up $4 trillion without raising taxes and interest rates.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
S&P 500 up 2.3 % today, gold down another 1.12 %.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Stock Market
Do you think they will jump up in the next 4 days? (Rates)Bowser wrote:Dump your stocks, get to a fixed rate or re-mortgage to a lower fixed rate for your mortgage & pay just the minimum, and pay down your credit cards because this is going to be ugly, real ugly, very soon. There is no way the government can make up $4 trillion without raising taxes and interest rates.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,249
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:15 pm
- Location: Under the Skycoaster
Re: Stock Market
kenny the kangaroo recalls bernake saying that rates will not rise until 2012 or 2013 or something.