Godfather Warz Game Thread

[columbia]

If I was a red leading a bandwagon on a player, you can be damn sure I would make sure it was an RP first

Actually, that would make you even more suspicious.

[newarenanow]

Yellow IE

just a vote? no rationale? not very thg'y

I think a case can be made for WK, IE, Columbia, or Relantel at this point. I'd like to hear some discussion at this point, as opposed to a quick bandwagon.

I wish people would bandwagon on some of those names. W/O a voting limit, I think that would draw those people out. If everything is split or no one is going to put on a vote, they will just remain quiet.

[shafnutz05]

The problem is that as soon as someone starts a bandwagon (like shad has), the other players (some good/some not) take start taking the absurd stance that the target IS THE OBVIOUS CHOICE, YOU NUMNUTZ.
It's an hysterical example of groupthink

I just don't like the way shad is handling this and I believe that redwill is indeed blue.

lynch columbia

This just seems too transparent to me. Strongly affirming that a player whom you know to be blue is blue is a tactic that has been used in warz games of old. Last game, the winners managed to go through the entire game with a very minimal amount of heat on them.

I know I led the bandwagon, but the above post and others just strike me as trying too hard to be the good guy. I'm down for rel or columbia, but I'll go with columbia for now.

whack columbia

[shafnutz05]

oops...I just realized I lynched and whacked columbia

[columbia]

oops...I just realized I lynched and whacked columbia

So much hate for me.

[mac5155]

jeez shad take er easy

[IrishEyes]

I'm here. Just got up.

whack relantel

He's screaming the quiet red to me.

[relantel]

Sadly misguided. I am blue, no more no less. If you feel the need to whack me, so be it. I won't stand in the way.

[shafnutz05]

I personally like columbia better at this juncture.

[thehockeyguru]

Warz is never in absolutes. And those that cast it that way (such as Shaf or THG this phase) make one second guess their motives. Does it matter to me if I'm the only vote? No. It has succeeded in getting Shaf to go nuts and defensive like he has something to hide.

Stuff like this makes me question Rel, but I dont think he is atop the list at this point.

[columbia]

To be fair, shad is being defensive and acting like he has something to hide.

[shafnutz05]

To be fair, shad is being defensive and acting like he has something to hide.

When it comes to Warz, I'm Nicklas Lidstrom.

[thehockeyguru]

To be fair, shad is being defensive and acting like he has something to hide.

I have no problem with that part, but his reference regarding myself is inaccurate.

[newarenanow]

Honestly, this shad/columbia thing seems to just be between the two of them and is pretty distracting, so getting one out might now be a bad idea.

But for the life of me, I don't know why we don't go after a quiet person. There is no vote limit, so we are not going to accidently vote out a green or something, it will draw them out into discussion, we have 8 more hours to discuss it. And may cause someone to slip up, or we may get lucky.

We do this every single game. If the reds win, you typcially see one of them barely participating until the end. All of the focus is typically off, and the village never puts any pressure on them to even give them a chance to slip up. And then at the end of the game, everyone in the post game says, "see we should have gone for the quiet ones, we'll do it next game" just to go back to what typically happens, just a lot of infighting, no one ever challenges any of the quiet people, and then it is the end of the game and you either have a red just sitting quietly with no heat because they have no chance to screw up, or a bunch of blues that have no idea what is going on.

We don't have to pick off each and every quiet person, but at least let's challenge them. It's still relatively early, we already have one red killed, so we have a little wiggle room. end/rant.

[Sam's Drunk Dog]

Day 3 Vote:
Relantel – 4 (Hammer, canaan, nan, IE)
WK – 2 (Mac, columbia)
IE – 1 (thg)
Columbia – 1 (shafnutz)

Left to Vote: WK, relantel, slappy

[newarenanow]

^^^ I meant to say "might NOT be a bad idea" with regards to shad/columbia.

Still should focus on the quiet ones IMO.

[columbia]

But for the life of me, I don't know why we don't go after a quiet person. There is no vote limit, so we are not going to accidently vote out a green or something, it will draw them out into discussion, we have 8 more

That is the likely outcome of today.

[thehockeyguru]

Nan - If we go that route I'd switch to WK.

[shafnutz05]

If we are pursuing the quiet vote, I wouldn't mind WK.

[Willie Kool]

If we're going for a quiet player, I think slappy is the best play.

Whack slappy

[thehockeyguru]

save IE

Yelllow WK

[shafnutz05]

Actually, i really wouldn't mind slappy at all. He pops in towards the end of every day phase, makes a smarmy (yet immensely enjoyable) comment, votes and leaves.

save columbia

whack slappy

[Willie Kool]

save IE

Yelllow WK

[newarenanow]

I'm still down for rel. He just gave the non-chalant "I'm blue, just kill me if be" excuse, and hasn't really added much. But I'm up for switching to any of IE, WK or slappy as well.

[relantel]

Not much of an excuse, NAN - blue is blue, and a blue voted off sure beats a green voted off.