Have to draw the line somewhere.thehockeyguru wrote:So 100.3 you can fly on a commercial flight, 100.4 you cant?tifosi77 wrote:Adding to the fever discussion, I just saw on the televee that for a fever to be considered a symptom of Ebola it must be at least 100.4 F.
¡EBOLA!
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,478
- Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 12:35 pm
Re: ¡EBOLA!
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: ¡EBOLA!
yep... i have a naturally high body temperature. When I go to donate blood, I am normally turned away because they think it's a fever because their cut off is so low. I think it's 99.1 or something like that.Crankshaft wrote:Have to draw the line somewhere.thehockeyguru wrote:So 100.3 you can fly on a commercial flight, 100.4 you cant?tifosi77 wrote:Adding to the fever discussion, I just saw on the televee that for a fever to be considered a symptom of Ebola it must be at least 100.4 F.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: ¡EBOLA!
The woman called the CDC, you would think that when she mentioned that she was running a 99.5 temp she would also have mentioned that she was treating the Ebola patient in Dallas, right? I cant imagine that she omitted that! To me even if she was a full degree below, having been in possible contact with the virus is enough to say dont travel on a commerical plane. Her situation is far different than Jane Smith having a 99.5 temp.tifosi77 wrote:Within a few tenths, I'd exercise caution. But nearly a full degree off, they'd have no reason to consider that symptomatic. She wasn't even a full degree above normal at the time she traveled. And if 100.4 is considered symptomatic and she was only 99.5, then that means she wasn't contagious when she flew.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4,087
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:55 pm
- Location: Mt. Lebanon
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Well, I'm hot blooded, check it and see!count2infinity wrote:yep... i have a naturally high body temperature. When I go to donate blood, I am normally turned away because they think it's a fever because their cut off is so low. I think it's 99.1 or something like that.Crankshaft wrote:Have to draw the line somewhere.thehockeyguru wrote:So 100.3 you can fly on a commercial flight, 100.4 you cant?tifosi77 wrote:Adding to the fever discussion, I just saw on the televee that for a fever to be considered a symptom of Ebola it must be at least 100.4 F.
I got a fever of a hundred and three!
Come on baby, do you do more than dance?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,868
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: Filly don't do rebounds.
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Pretty sure she mentioned that. It's not like everyone in the country with a fever is calling the CDC before the travel atm. It was just the CDC dropping the ball big time (not a huge surprise).thehockeyguru wrote:The woman called the CDC, you would think that when she mentioned that she was running a 99.5 temp she would also have mentioned that she was treating the Ebola patient in Dallas, right? I cant imagine that she omitted that! To me even if she was a full degree below, having been in possible contact with the virus is enough to say dont travel on a commerical plane. Her situation is far different than Jane Smith having a 99.5 temp.tifosi77 wrote:Within a few tenths, I'd exercise caution. But nearly a full degree off, they'd have no reason to consider that symptomatic. She wasn't even a full degree above normal at the time she traveled. And if 100.4 is considered symptomatic and she was only 99.5, then that means she wasn't contagious when she flew.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,254
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 9:51 am
- Location: BANNED for liking Butterfingers
Re: ¡EBOLA!
One would think she'd be slight paranoid and err on the side of caution. She knows she's been around Ebola and she's running a fever, on of the earliest signs of it. Now granted many other conditions can cause you to run a slight fever, but use a little common sense for crying out loud.thehockeyguru wrote:The woman called the CDC, you would think that when she mentioned that she was running a 99.5 temp she would also have mentioned that she was treating the Ebola patient in Dallas, right? I cant imagine that she omitted that! To me even if she was a full degree below, having been in possible contact with the virus is enough to say dont travel on a commerical plane. Her situation is far different than Jane Smith having a 99.5 temp.tifosi77 wrote:Within a few tenths, I'd exercise caution. But nearly a full degree off, they'd have no reason to consider that symptomatic. She wasn't even a full degree above normal at the time she traveled. And if 100.4 is considered symptomatic and she was only 99.5, then that means she wasn't contagious when she flew.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:08 pm
Re: ¡EBOLA!
"Average human body temperature
Body temperature changes throughout the day. It is the lowest in the early morning between 4 and 6 a.m., and the highest in the early evening between 6 and 8 p.m. Normal temperature is about 37°C or 98.6°F. However, it can be as low as 36.1°C (97°F) in the early morning to a high of 37.2°C (99°F) in the evening and still be considered normal. An infant may have a higher than normal temperature if he/she is overdressed. Also, if it is hot outside or if the room is hot, a baby's temperature may rise."

Body temperature changes throughout the day. It is the lowest in the early morning between 4 and 6 a.m., and the highest in the early evening between 6 and 8 p.m. Normal temperature is about 37°C or 98.6°F. However, it can be as low as 36.1°C (97°F) in the early morning to a high of 37.2°C (99°F) in the evening and still be considered normal. An infant may have a higher than normal temperature if he/she is overdressed. Also, if it is hot outside or if the room is hot, a baby's temperature may rise."

-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,082
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:33 pm
- Location: White-Juday Warp Field Interferometer
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Okay, I just learned this morning that she called the CDC ahead of her flight. (I would think obviously for advice on whether or not it was safe for her to fly, having been treating an Ebola patient for a week.) I agree that's not only irresponsible on the part of the CDC but also reckless on her part regardless what guidance she was given.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: ¡EBOLA!
I agree. How the CDC can be this inept is beyond me.tifosi77 wrote:Okay, I just learned this morning that she called the CDC ahead of her flight. (I would think obviously for advice on whether or not it was safe for her to fly, having been treating an Ebola patient for a week.) I agree that's not only irresponsible on the part of the CDC but also reckless on her part regardless what guidance she was given.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24,978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Thanks Obama
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Good thing they didn't confirm that gun control radical for surgeon general, so we have the expert leadership of __________ to head this potential disaster.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,331
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:29 pm
- Location: Gasp! The Clamboni!
Re: ¡EBOLA!
It's finally happened.
PensInsideScoop tweeted today a reporter asked Crosby about Ebola. Unfortunately he didn't tweet Crosby's answer.

PensInsideScoop tweeted today a reporter asked Crosby about Ebola. Unfortunately he didn't tweet Crosby's answer.

-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Oh come now. Vivek Murthy was a lousy candidate for surgeon general, something even mainstream media outlets have alluded to. He is a 36 (37 now?) year old physician, and his primary qualifications for the post are that he loves Obama, loves the Affordable Care Act, and was the leader of "Doctors for Obama". That's it.Troy Loney wrote:Good thing they didn't confirm that gun control radical for surgeon general, so we have the expert leadership of __________ to head this potential disaster.
I think we need a surgeon general to get out in front on this stuff, but I hardly think a 36 year old that isn't far removed from clinicals is really the ideal candidate. I think his views on guns are utterly absurd, but that's almost an afterthought.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: ¡EBOLA!
No, you come on. That was blocked because of his stance on gun control and then youth/inexperience cited.shafnutz05 wrote:Oh come now. Vivek Murthy was a lousy candidate for surgeon general, something even mainstream media outlets have alluded to. He is a 36 (37 now?) year old physician, and his primary qualifications for the post are that he loves Obama, loves the Affordable Care Act, and was the leader of "Doctors for Obama". That's it.Troy Loney wrote:Good thing they didn't confirm that gun control radical for surgeon general, so we have the expert leadership of __________ to head this potential disaster.
I think we need a surgeon general to get out in front on this stuff, but I hardly think a 36 year old that isn't far removed from clinicals is really the ideal candidate. I think his views on guns are utterly absurd, but that's almost an afterthought.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ¡EBOLA!
???shafnutz05 wrote:Oh come now. Vivek Murthy was a lousy candidate for surgeon general, something even mainstream media outlets have alluded to. He is a 36 (37 now?) year old physician, and his primary qualifications for the post are that he loves Obama, loves the Affordable Care Act, and was the leader of "Doctors for Obama". That's it.Troy Loney wrote:Good thing they didn't confirm that gun control radical for surgeon general, so we have the expert leadership of __________ to head this potential disaster.
I think we need a surgeon general to get out in front on this stuff, but I hardly think a 36 year old that isn't far removed from clinicals is really the ideal candidate. I think his views on guns are utterly absurd, but that's almost an afterthought.
Harvard and Yale-educated with an MD and MBA. Practices at one of the largest hospitals in a major metropolitan city. On the faculty at Harvard Med.
He's young, so fair enough if you'd prefer an older candidate (pluses and minuses there as well), but at least a reasonable basis for opposition.
The only reason he's not being confirmed is the gun control issue. That's it.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Regardless of the rationale, he was a lousy pick by Obama. Let's pick a relatively (emphasis) inexperienced doctor with extreme gun control views and has been an Obama acolyte for almost a decade. Congress has blocked candidates unfairly before but this was a poor nomination.
Slappy makes fair (and admittedly impressive) points, but he doesn't strike me as the type of candidate this position needs. Namely, a widely respected and trusted authority figure. I don't think the role lends itself to someone that has been as involved in partisan politics as he has been, IMO
Slappy makes fair (and admittedly impressive) points, but he doesn't strike me as the type of candidate this position needs. Namely, a widely respected and trusted authority figure. I don't think the role lends itself to someone that has been as involved in partisan politics as he has been, IMO
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Excuse me if I don't respect your opposition to a surgeon general nomination.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ¡EBOLA!
LolTroy Loney wrote:Excuse me if I don't respect your opposition to a surgeon general nomination.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Now if he had been from Altoona....
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: ¡EBOLA!
lol... someone just posted on facebook that Ebola has gone airborne. People are idiots.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24,978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: ¡EBOLA!
it did when it was in the plane
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: ¡EBOLA!
The girl that had it as her status and had a lot of discussion to it said about how worried she was that she or her kids will catch ebola when they fly back East. Someone said "then don't fly." She said it's urgent as a family member has cancer and she's going to see them. Someone commented and then I believe either deleted it or the girl deleted it said, "Careful... you have an equal chance of catching the cancer as you do the ebola." I lol'd
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Superb...stop buying into the hysteria both in the media and in this thread.
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,615
- Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:57 am
- Location: Sparta, WI
Re: ¡EBOLA!
Could just not let you kid **** lick everything. It's a flight, do us all a favor and duct tape their mouths shut for everyone's safety.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,082
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:33 pm
- Location: White-Juday Warp Field Interferometer
Re: ¡EBOLA!
I confess to not knowing much about this nominee (the SG office is not one to which I typically pay an ounce of attention). So I looked up who all endorsed him.shafnutz05 wrote:Regardless of the rationale, he was a lousy pick by Obama. Let's pick a relatively (emphasis) inexperienced doctor with extreme gun control views and has been an Obama acolyte for almost a decade. Congress has blocked candidates unfairly before but this was a poor nomination.
Slappy makes fair (and admittedly impressive) points, but he doesn't strike me as the type of candidate this position needs. Namely, a widely respected and trusted authority figure. I don't think the role lends itself to someone that has been as involved in partisan politics as he has been, IMO
Spoiler: