I don't know, maybe I'm able to watch last weeks episode with a "1st episode of the new story arc" viewpoint and can appreciate it more. I can see how it sets up a bunch of storyline. I felt that most of this weeks episode was the same and could have been tossed into a 1.5 hour season premier.the wicked child wrote:Ending the show with 10 minutes of holy **** awesomeness tends to have that effect... but last week was still ho-hum.PensFanInDC wrote:I must watch television in a totally different way than you guys cause I loved last weeks episode and thought the first 50 minutes of this one was terrible.
The Walking Dead
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Idoit40fans wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:Episode was good, if Merle doesn't rejoin the group, then boo this show.Spoiler:Spoiler:
Spoiler:
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Malkamaniac wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:Malkamaniac wrote:Idoit40fans wrote:Episode was good, if Merle doesn't rejoin the group, then boo this show.Spoiler:Spoiler:Spoiler:
Spoiler:
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
TWD screws up the believability factor in their portrayal of human interaction and critical decision making, and that really bugs me. and it's not that i hold them to a high standard in that regard - they're worse than your average show. last night was better, but i'm wondering why the governor's crew went into full bond villain mode and essentially left their enemy alone with a bunch of incompetent henchmen (zombies), and then drove away, assuming their plan would go perfectly.PensFanInDC wrote:I must watch television in a totally different way than you guys cause I loved last weeks episode and thought the first 50 minutes of this one was terrible.
also, this is a little thing...but these people shoot zombies in the exact center of their brains like it's no big deal all the time, but can't hit a stationary dude in a watch tower?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
I think their motive was to scare them more than anything. If they could whack them all at that time, great. If not they at least have scared the living crap out of them. Also remember the person who drove the zombie taxi is still at the prison. Looked like a chick too. It also destroyed the main gate basically rendering that whole section of the prison unusable.shmenguin wrote:TWD screws up the believability factor in their portrayal of human interaction and critical decision making, and that really bugs me. and it's not that i hold them to a high standard in that regard - they're worse than your average show. last night was better, but i'm wondering why the governor's crew went into full bond villain mode and essentially left their enemy alone with a bunch of incompetent henchmen (zombies), and then drove away, assuming their plan would go perfectly.PensFanInDC wrote:I must watch television in a totally different way than you guys cause I loved last weeks episode and thought the first 50 minutes of this one was terrible.
also, this is a little thing...but these people shoot zombies in the exact center of their brains like it's no big deal all the time, but can't hit a stationary dude in a watch tower?
I was also ticked off at the lack of accuracy during the shootout.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 18,334
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:40 pm
- Location: http://DrunkInAGraveyard.com
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
If the goal was to scare them, what's the end game? Scare 'em real good, and then leave them alone? No. They are obviously going to attack again. Which makes scaring them pointless. It makes no sense that they didn't just go in and kill everyone in there while they had the element of surprise on their side.
they should have started with the van crashing the gates and letting the zombies out. then, while they were dealing with the zombies, get guys with rifles up in the towers picking off anyone who stuck their head out, and then sent a heavilly armed crew to mow down whatever was left. It would have been so easy. I don't understand the point of attacking, and leaving them beaten, but not finishing them off in this situation.
they should have started with the van crashing the gates and letting the zombies out. then, while they were dealing with the zombies, get guys with rifles up in the towers picking off anyone who stuck their head out, and then sent a heavilly armed crew to mow down whatever was left. It would have been so easy. I don't understand the point of attacking, and leaving them beaten, but not finishing them off in this situation.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
I don't understand how they got into the tower.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Then the show would have to end. We don't want that.Froggy wrote:If the goal was to scare them, what's the end game? Scare 'em real good, and then leave them alone? No. They are obviously going to attack again. Which makes scaring them pointless. It makes no sense that they didn't just go in and kill everyone in there while they had the element of surprise on their side.
they should have started with the van crashing the gates and letting the zombies out. then, while they were dealing with the zombies, get guys with rifles up in the towers picking off anyone who stuck their head out, and then sent a heavilly armed crew to mow down whatever was left. It would have been so easy. I don't understand the point of attacking, and leaving them beaten, but not finishing them off in this situation.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 18,334
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:40 pm
- Location: http://DrunkInAGraveyard.com
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
There was a line earlier where someone asked who was on watch duty. So I'm guessing no one was paying attention to people sneaking in
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Then the show would have to end. We don't want that.Froggy wrote:If the goal was to scare them, what's the end game? Scare 'em real good, and then leave them alone? No. They are obviously going to attack again. Which makes scaring them pointless. It makes no sense that they didn't just go in and kill everyone in there while they had the element of surprise on their side.
they should have started with the van crashing the gates and letting the zombies out. then, while they were dealing with the zombies, get guys with rifles up in the towers picking off anyone who stuck their head out, and then sent a heavilly armed crew to mow down whatever was left. It would have been so easy. I don't understand the point of attacking, and leaving them beaten, but not finishing them off in this situation.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,595
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 2:55 pm
- Location: Inside the tumor in Crosby's neck.
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
I can give them the benefit of the doubt aim wise...its harder to aim when you cant take your time and someone is shooting back...with a zombie you can take your time until they are right on you...but everyone having a headshot hack on does seem odd. I suppose we are supposed to realize they have been doing this a while and got the aiming down or something.
Besides being a fun scene to watch...yeah, they should have swooped in and just killed them all, but I suppose they are weak too and just lost men themselves? They had to find the jail first? They realize the jail is fortified and everyone is holed up inside and have to plan a better attack...why not pick off a few while you are there to make the next attack easier? Both sides know that the war is on so perhaps taking a shot and weakening them now forces them inside...I am reaching here though - I see your point. Or maybe we have to just chalk it up to...the governor is crazy and does what he wants without thinking much through now. Kind of like Glen is acting.
My biggest thought when it all went down was - you know you are surprising them...wait for Rick to show his face and pick him off instead of the random prisoner you never saw before.
Besides being a fun scene to watch...yeah, they should have swooped in and just killed them all, but I suppose they are weak too and just lost men themselves? They had to find the jail first? They realize the jail is fortified and everyone is holed up inside and have to plan a better attack...why not pick off a few while you are there to make the next attack easier? Both sides know that the war is on so perhaps taking a shot and weakening them now forces them inside...I am reaching here though - I see your point. Or maybe we have to just chalk it up to...the governor is crazy and does what he wants without thinking much through now. Kind of like Glen is acting.
My biggest thought when it all went down was - you know you are surprising them...wait for Rick to show his face and pick him off instead of the random prisoner you never saw before.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Maybe it was more of a scout/scare mission. Scout out what kind of numbers and firepower they have, scare the hell out of them, and then come back to finish the job with a better understanding of what they are up against. Maybe even be able to take the prison without a fight if they decided to run away.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Maybe he is just a psycho/sociopath.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 61,595
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: Lake Wylie, SC
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Head shots are easy with 9 months of practice they have all had by now on slow moving targets that don't change height and aren't shooting back at you.
The governor doesn't want the prison, he wants Woodbury to be the only safe haven. They lost a lot of ground to zombies now and even getting out of the prison will be hard. And as for the comics:
MAJOR SPOILERS FOR THE COMIC
Don't expect details to make it over, we are way past that point.
The governor doesn't want the prison, he wants Woodbury to be the only safe haven. They lost a lot of ground to zombies now and even getting out of the prison will be hard. And as for the comics:
MAJOR SPOILERS FOR THE COMIC
Spoiler:
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,637
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:48 pm
- Location: Man Cave in Washington, PA
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Yeah, I thought the exact same thing. They kill all the moving walking dead with quick head shots and never miss, but couldn't hit a steady target with a scoped rifle. Very confusing.PensFanInDC wrote:
I was also ticked off at the lack of accuracy during the shootout.

-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 4,495
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:19 am
- Location: Aliquippa, PA
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
He (Michael Rooker) was also McMasters in Tombstone. Couldn't place it right away, but realized it after I caught a re-run of Tombstone about a week or so ago.JeffDFD wrote:The actor who plays Merle voices a character in Black Ops 2. Messed with me the whole time. Both characters are vulgar bad @. The new thing with the Black Ops 2 is different choices you make impact the rest of the game and the ending. Him having the voice from walking dead impacted my decision making.npv708 wrote:I had to laugh. The wife is watching Once Upon a Time and the one actor looks super familiar, so I went to the Google machine and found out it was "Dave" from the Nebraska episode, where a skinny guy and a fat guy get shot by Rick in the bar scene when they go looking for Herschel
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,640
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:21 pm
- Location: Roger Roger.
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Same here with the gun battle at the end. Rick has a clean shot at Martinez, and lines the scope to the right, blowing the shot. It's like they want the characters around longer... 
Good episode though...

Good episode though...
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 18,692
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:02 pm
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
I used to only see Mr. Svenning.Stoosh wrote:He (Michael Rooker) was also McMasters in Tombstone. Couldn't place it right away, but realized it after I caught a re-run of Tombstone about a week or so ago.JeffDFD wrote:The actor who plays Merle voices a character in Black Ops 2. Messed with me the whole time. Both characters are vulgar bad @. The new thing with the Black Ops 2 is different choices you make impact the rest of the game and the ending. Him having the voice from walking dead impacted my decision making.npv708 wrote:I had to laugh. The wife is watching Once Upon a Time and the one actor looks super familiar, so I went to the Google machine and found out it was "Dave" from the Nebraska episode, where a skinny guy and a fat guy get shot by Rick in the bar scene when they go looking for Herschel
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Henrynocera wrote:I used to only see Mr. Svenning.Stoosh wrote:He (Michael Rooker) was also McMasters in Tombstone. Couldn't place it right away, but realized it after I caught a re-run of Tombstone about a week or so ago.JeffDFD wrote:The actor who plays Merle voices a character in Black Ops 2. Messed with me the whole time. Both characters are vulgar bad @. The new thing with the Black Ops 2 is different choices you make impact the rest of the game and the ending. Him having the voice from walking dead impacted my decision making.npv708 wrote:I had to laugh. The wife is watching Once Upon a Time and the one actor looks super familiar, so I went to the Google machine and found out it was "Dave" from the Nebraska episode, where a skinny guy and a fat guy get shot by Rick in the bar scene when they go looking for Herschel
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,950
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:39 pm
- Location: Searching the Congo for Crocosaurus.
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
This. That tower is INSIDE the gates...Idoit40fans wrote:I don't understand how they got into the tower.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
finally caught up enough to post in this thread...
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 2,800
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:12 pm
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Wire clippers?ILikeTurtles wrote:This. That tower is INSIDE the gates...Idoit40fans wrote:I don't understand how they got into the tower.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Opposable thumbs...Firebird wrote:Wire clippers?ILikeTurtles wrote:This. That tower is INSIDE the gates...Idoit40fans wrote:I don't understand how they got into the tower.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Until this thread, I had no clue it was based on a comic. So for my enjoyment purposes, probably better off I don't go reading said comic. So thanks for the spoilers on that. I was careful not to read this thread at all until we had watched the last of the first half of the 3rd season.
These last two epsiodes, Suicide King and the one after, seem to me like they might have been better off as two 90 minute ones - lumping the last half of this one into next week's episode. But I understand their method - having to create a reason at the end of this last one to watch the next one. And that it did.
At times, I am not sure if it is the writing that leaves me wanting or the acting. Whole sections of the show seem like it lacks flow, kind of choppy. But they find themselves just enough to crescendo to the end.
These last two epsiodes, Suicide King and the one after, seem to me like they might have been better off as two 90 minute ones - lumping the last half of this one into next week's episode. But I understand their method - having to create a reason at the end of this last one to watch the next one. And that it did.
At times, I am not sure if it is the writing that leaves me wanting or the acting. Whole sections of the show seem like it lacks flow, kind of choppy. But they find themselves just enough to crescendo to the end.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,298
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:49 am
- Location: Freddy Beach
Re: Walking Dead - Season 3
Michael Rooker (Merle) also plays Brandi's father in Mallrats. My mind was blown when I found that out!JeffDFD wrote:The actor who plays Merle voices a character in Black Ops 2. Messed with me the whole time. Both characters are vulgar bad @. The new thing with the Black Ops 2 is different choices you make impact the rest of the game and the ending. Him having the voice from walking dead impacted my decision making.npv708 wrote:I had to laugh. The wife is watching Once Upon a Time and the one actor looks super familiar, so I went to the Google machine and found out it was "Dave" from the Nebraska episode, where a skinny guy and a fat guy get shot by Rick in the bar scene when they go looking for Herschel