***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Ministry of Plenty Adjusted Vote Totals
pittsports - 3 (TWC, azkar, C2I)
mac - 1 (zaro)
zaro -3 (canaan, pfidc, mac)
7 to unperson. 6 PM DEADLINE.
pittsports - 3 (TWC, azkar, C2I)
mac - 1 (zaro)
zaro -3 (canaan, pfidc, mac)
7 to unperson. 6 PM DEADLINE.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
I feel better about voting with TWC at the moment. Pittsports isnt a bad choice either.
save zaro
kill pittsports
save zaro
kill pittsports
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Ministry of Plenty Adjusted Vote Totals
pittsports - 4 (TWC, azkar, C2I, pfidc)
mac - 1 (zaro)
zaro -2 (canaan, mac)
7 to unperson. 6 PM DEADLINE.
pittsports - 4 (TWC, azkar, C2I, pfidc)
mac - 1 (zaro)
zaro -2 (canaan, mac)
7 to unperson. 6 PM DEADLINE.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
So nobody who has voted has a double vote. Does that tell us anything?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
IMO you are really pushing the vote adjustment stuff hard..PensFanInDC wrote:So nobody who has voted has a double vote. Does that tell us anything?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Just trying to figure out who is who my man.mac5155 wrote:IMO you are really pushing the vote adjustment stuff hard..PensFanInDC wrote:So nobody who has voted has a double vote. Does that tell us anything?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Slappy said that they can either add or take away a vote from someone. My vote doesn't exist this round. I don't think someone will get a double vote. I don't know if that also means that thg is the one who's vote would be deflected to someone else or if they can choose a different person.PensFanInDC wrote:So nobody who has voted has a double vote. Does that tell us anything?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
It's not really about post counts, but more what people are saying.... posting a lot without saying much is a baddie trait I think. I also have pittsports on my list.Zarovich wrote:I would like to point out that azkar (10), canaan (8), Doc Emerick (5), mac (7), relental (9), and twc (12) all have significantly less posts than me. I guess they are really helping.
c2i and pittsports87 are about the same number wise as me and pittsports87 has brought little as well. c2i seems to be helping out lately at least.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
This is half out of nowhere having not been on all morning...
So we're going for pittsports over senka, who has been next to invisible? Is this solely on the facepalm? (if it's his/her first game, I'd say cut some slack). Senka, like loaf, not sure is even aware the game is going on. On the other hand, we have been drug near the deadline on some of the night actions, so maybe he is there behind the scenes?
for those on zaro - is your reasoning anything more than zaro is always bad? I could go that way on something more this-game related.
TWC and MWB "independently" clearing PFiDC - smokescreen, perhaps? That sounds like a Red ploy. I.e. coordinated. As in, they appear to be able to communicate outside the thread. it might not be a red ploy. But it sure seems suspicious.
So we're going for pittsports over senka, who has been next to invisible? Is this solely on the facepalm? (if it's his/her first game, I'd say cut some slack). Senka, like loaf, not sure is even aware the game is going on. On the other hand, we have been drug near the deadline on some of the night actions, so maybe he is there behind the scenes?
for those on zaro - is your reasoning anything more than zaro is always bad? I could go that way on something more this-game related.
TWC and MWB "independently" clearing PFiDC - smokescreen, perhaps? That sounds like a Red ploy. I.e. coordinated. As in, they appear to be able to communicate outside the thread. it might not be a red ploy. But it sure seems suspicious.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,988
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location: RVA
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,988
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location: RVA
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
since when has a game started on not a monday? this is absurd.
I wanna kill TWC. but i should read up on everything first and talk to my fellow red team who has been oh so patient with me.
I wanna kill TWC. but i should read up on everything first and talk to my fellow red team who has been oh so patient with me.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
this actually sort of makes me want to vote for you...Senka wrote:Spoiler:
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Senka wrote:since when has a game started on not a monday? this is absurd.
I wanna kill TWC. but i should read up on everything first and talk to my fellow red team who has been oh so patient with me.

-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Interesting... you bring up a lot of questions that have already been discussed and answered.relantel wrote:This is half out of nowhere having not been on all morning...
So we're going for pittsports over senka, who has been next to invisible? Is this solely on the facepalm? (if it's his/her first game, I'd say cut some slack). Senka, like loaf, not sure is even aware the game is going on. On the other hand, we have been drug near the deadline on some of the night actions, so maybe he is there behind the scenes?
for those on zaro - is your reasoning anything more than zaro is always bad? I could go that way on something more this-game related.
TWC and MWB "independently" clearing PFiDC - smokescreen, perhaps? That sounds like a Red ploy. I.e. coordinated. As in, they appear to be able to communicate outside the thread. it might not be a red ploy. But it sure seems suspicious.
My reason for "clearing" pfidc is that it doesn't make any sense for them to control votes that are aimed at him.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,988
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:16 pm
- Location: RVA
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
upon further talking with my crew, Im going to Vaporize Relantel. Not just to go off of what MWB says, or side with him at all, but heres the thing.. I always do that when Im red. Point out facts and statements that have already come out, seeming as if im contributing. and Relantel might really be contributing, but its all strategy at this point. I only read like 40% of the thread so far and read through all the 10s of PMs ive gotten, but thats what ive decided on. who is the pittssport character? haha
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
So Senka is trying to get voted off?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Your quick dismissal sounds like a red ploy. Don't like the discussion? Belittle the question.MWB wrote:Interesting... you bring up a lot of questions that have already been discussed and answered.
My reason for "clearing" pfidc is that it doesn't make any sense for them to control votes that are aimed at him.
I speak of this very day phase. A red would most certainly try and misdirect and get one of their guys cleared by aiming a stuck vote at him. I would do that if I were red.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Ministry of Plenty Adjusted Vote Totals
pittsports - 4 (TWC, azkar, C2I, pfidc)
mac - 1 (zaro)
zaro -2 (canaan, mac)
relantel - 1 (senka)
7 to unperson. 6 PM DEADLINE.
pittsports - 4 (TWC, azkar, C2I, pfidc)
mac - 1 (zaro)
zaro -2 (canaan, mac)
relantel - 1 (senka)
7 to unperson. 6 PM DEADLINE.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
What am I misdirecting... I'm just pointing out the questions you bring up were already asked and answered. And what is being misdirected?relantel wrote:Your quick dismissal sounds like a red ploy. Don't like the discussion? Belittle the question.MWB wrote:Interesting... you bring up a lot of questions that have already been discussed and answered.
My reason for "clearing" pfidc is that it doesn't make any sense for them to control votes that are aimed at him.
I speak of this very day phase. A red would most certainly try and misdirect and get one of their guys cleared by aiming a stuck vote at him. I would do that if I were red.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
The PFiDC vote. Make us think he is clear by directing a vote on to him, when it is clear the reds are directing the vote.MWB wrote:What am I misdirecting... I'm just pointing out the questions you bring up were already asked and answered. And what is being misdirected?relantel wrote:Your quick dismissal sounds like a red ploy. Don't like the discussion? Belittle the question.MWB wrote:Interesting... you bring up a lot of questions that have already been discussed and answered.
My reason for "clearing" pfidc is that it doesn't make any sense for them to control votes that are aimed at him.
I speak of this very day phase. A red would most certainly try and misdirect and get one of their guys cleared by aiming a stuck vote at him. I would do that if I were red.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
I'll let my voting record speak for itself.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Ok, I understand this part now. But I don't understand the other part of what you say.relantel wrote:The PFiDC vote. Make us think he is clear by directing a vote on to him, when it is clear the reds are directing the vote.
What vote are you referring to?I speak of this very day phase. A red would most certainly try and misdirect and get one of their guys cleared by aiming a stuck vote at him. I would do that if I were red.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
Yikes, I get home to find out I am the target? What did I do? I am blue.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
though im not positive, i think its more of what didnt you do and the answer is participate.pittsports87 wrote:Yikes, I get home to find out I am the target? What did I do? I am blue.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: ***** 1984 WARZ GAME THREAD *****
MWB, sorry, split thoughts there. This very day phase both you and TWC came out to clear PFiDC based on the prior day phase's directed vote.MWB wrote:Ok, I understand this part now. But I don't understand the other part of what you say.relantel wrote:The PFiDC vote. Make us think he is clear by directing a vote on to him, when it is clear the reds are directing the vote.What vote are you referring to?I speak of this very day phase. A red would most certainly try and misdirect and get one of their guys cleared by aiming a stuck vote at him. I would do that if I were red.