No Doc's Allowed Warz
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
i'll go bhaw.
ban bhaw
ban bhaw
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
Kraftster-1 (relental)
sdm-4 (nan, bhaw, columbia, hammertime)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 4 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny)
7 to ban.
sdm-4 (nan, bhaw, columbia, hammertime)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 4 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny)
7 to ban.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
?
I agreed with nan because sdm used to play a lot when the games first started and he WAS a quiet player. I didn't incorrectly identify anyone. I know who sdm is and how he used to play. I was also surprised to see him back in a game. I did not confuse him for loaf, and just because nan did doesn't mean that I did.
NAN went on a sidetrack about Loaf, but that doesn't change the fact that sdm was usually quiet in earlier games.
I agreed with nan because sdm used to play a lot when the games first started and he WAS a quiet player. I didn't incorrectly identify anyone. I know who sdm is and how he used to play. I was also surprised to see him back in a game. I did not confuse him for loaf, and just because nan did doesn't mean that I did.
NAN went on a sidetrack about Loaf, but that doesn't change the fact that sdm was usually quiet in earlier games.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
This is reaching. The only thing proved wrong was that NAN thought sdm played last game. The fact that he is quiet was never disproven. This is pushing really hard. I'm only blue, so it's no major loss, but this is pretty shoddy reasoning.shafnutz05 wrote:unban Kraft
ban bhaw
Looking back, Kraftster's reasoning on bhaw is about as solid as it gets. NAN made a pretty baseless claim that sdm was "quiet", and it was eventually proved wrong. However, that didn't stop bhaw from happily and quickly adding the second vote to try and doom SDM to a bandwagon fate. The fact he just blindly followed along is indicative of something to me...
Also, I didn't QUICKLY add anything. There was almost an hour between NAN's post and mine. Just b/c 2 posts are sequential doesn't make them quick.
If anyone is happily bending over and stroking someone else, it's shaf stroking Kraftster.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,602
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:25 am
- Location: Frolik
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
I welcome warz stroking.
This is the most difficult Day 1 ever.
This is the most difficult Day 1 ever.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
bhaw wrote:?
I agreed with nan because sdm used to play a lot when the games first started and he WAS a quiet player. I didn't incorrectly identify anyone. I know who sdm is and how he used to play. I was also surprised to see him back in a game. I did not confuse him for loaf, and just because nan did doesn't mean that I did.
NAN went on a sidetrack about Loaf, but that doesn't change the fact that sdm was usually quiet in earlier games.
what a bunch of hot air. tell me, what's bhaw short for? Blow Hawd?
String'em up! String'em up!
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
lol, who am I stroking?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
I'm off to work. I'll try to get in a write-up on my break around 6:30. Try to keep the vote up to date and once the voting is done you can start sending in PM's.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
That means deadline is 6:30 for this day phase.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,043
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:35 pm
- Location: Back in the P to the A
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
bhaw wrote:?
I agreed with nan because sdm used to play a lot when the games first started and he WAS a quiet player. I didn't incorrectly identify anyone. I know who sdm is and how he used to play. I was also surprised to see him back in a game. I did not confuse him for loaf, and just because nan did doesn't mean that I did.
NAN went on a sidetrack about Loaf, but that doesn't change the fact that sdm was usually quiet in earlier games.
I agree with this. I am not about to go after bhaw because people think NAN screwed up my name and bhaw is bad because he voted after him?
I will disagree you dont know who I am ( I dont think

but you and NAN for that matter trying to go after a quiet person, or who is perceived normally quiet in the past doesn't scream bad to me. But it is day 1 and really it doesnt matter on this day someone has to go and there isn't anything to go on
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
ok so what we know:
1) redwill was killed
2) an early wagon started on a non-talker
3) that player has since talked as much as anyone
4) people are still voting for that non-talker
so who would kill redwill? who was on that bandwagon, and who still wont switch their vote away despite #3?
how about a little support form some people that voted for someone for "no reason"?
1) redwill was killed
2) an early wagon started on a non-talker
3) that player has since talked as much as anyone
4) people are still voting for that non-talker
so who would kill redwill? who was on that bandwagon, and who still wont switch their vote away despite #3?
how about a little support form some people that voted for someone for "no reason"?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
unban sdm
ban shaf
reasoning above.
ban shaf
reasoning above.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
unban sdm
ban bhaw
I was pretty upfront about doing a complete bandwagon on sdm, so worries about switching.
ban bhaw
I was pretty upfront about doing a complete bandwagon on sdm, so worries about switching.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
lol... sdm even vouched for what I'm saying.columbia wrote:unban sdm
ban bhaw
I was pretty upfront about doing a complete bandwagon on sdm, so worries about switching.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
allow me
Kraftster-1 (relental)
sdm-4 (nan, hammertime)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 4 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny, columbia)
Shaf- 1 (bhaw)
7 to ban.
Kraftster-1 (relental)
sdm-4 (nan, hammertime)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 4 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny, columbia)
Shaf- 1 (bhaw)
7 to ban.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
fixed. sorryBenny Fitz wrote:allow me
Kraftster-1 (relental)
sdm-2 (nan, hammertime)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 5 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny, columbia)
Shaf- 1 (bhaw)
7 to ban.
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 9:33 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
unban sdm
ban bhaw
ban bhaw
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,133
- Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:40 am
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
Kraftster-1 (relental)
sdm-1 (nan)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 6 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny, columbia, hammertime)
Shaf- 1 (bhaw)
7 to ban.
sdm-1 (nan)
mwb-2 (canaan, sdm)
Bhaw- 6 (shaf, kraft, rylan, benny, columbia, hammertime)
Shaf- 1 (bhaw)
7 to ban.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
it's like a mid-game reboot about day 6 or so...Kraftster wrote:I welcome warz stroking.
This is the most difficult Day 1 ever.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
sdm was usually quiet in the past. Where I messed up is that I thought he played last game.Benny Fitz wrote:3) that player has since talked as much as anyone
4) people are still voting for that non-talker
He's talking now because there was heat on him.
I'll switch my vote because I'm just basing his vote off of him usually being quiet, but there really is nothing ot go on that. We need to get this day done.
unlynch sdm
lynch bhaw
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,043
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:35 pm
- Location: Back in the P to the A
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
and because I have a busted leg and my lazy rear can't leave the couch for a few more weeks, but your first point is validnewarenanow wrote:sdm was usually quiet in the past. Where I messed up is that I thought he played last game.Benny Fitz wrote:3) that player has since talked as much as anyone
4) people are still voting for that non-talker
He's talking now because there was heat on him.
I'll switch my vote because I'm just basing his vote off of him usually being quiet, but there really is nothing ot go on that. We need to get this day done.
unlynch sdm
lynch bhaw
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
Hmm...the fact that bhaw changed his vote to me makes me more confident, but we shall see.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
I'm blue, but your strategy is clearly to eliminate the seasoned players who have been having good games recently.shafnutz05 wrote:Hmm...the fact that bhaw changed his vote to me makes me more confident, but we shall see.
Well done.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,740
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: From Hockey Siberia to Hockey Hell
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,588
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: College
Re: No Doc's Allowed Warz
Bhaw was a
Pms to me plox.
Spoiler:
Pms to me plox.