looking back to his split lists, in light of the last day/night phase.Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:What was the initial reasoning behind rylan?
WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
unless I am forgetting whose list it wasrelantel wrote:looking back to his split lists, in light of the last day/night phase.Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:What was the initial reasoning behind rylan?

-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Shaf's vote has him well up my list. I think SDD could still be a good vote. What's the reasoning for Mac?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
yeah, rylan had a list but it wasn't the two group list. rylan's seemed to be overkill, something a red might do to seem blue.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,587
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
- Location: Shutter Island
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I had the the lists of who voted for both Nan and mall and who didn't so maybe you're thinking of me.relantel wrote:unless I am forgetting whose list it wasrelantel wrote:looking back to his split lists, in light of the last day/night phase.Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:What was the initial reasoning behind rylan?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Yes, that was SDD's list.
Also, did IE's late switch screw the reds? I thought it was tied, then Juice said write up coming, then IE switched to Canaan. So did she just switch thinking that it was going to be a tie and her vote wouldn't get changed?
Also, did IE's late switch screw the reds? I thought it was tied, then Juice said write up coming, then IE switched to Canaan. So did she just switch thinking that it was going to be a tie and her vote wouldn't get changed?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
This post, along with your last post (strangely enough), have me almost convinced that you and c2i are the last two reds. How is c2i possibly as bad of a play as you are suggesting?relantel wrote:c2i is as bad a play as you are. mac would be a far better play, but still not sold on him over rylan.shafnutz05 wrote:FWIW, mac was also on my list of people that could be bad, based on voting/comments last day phase. But I really think c2i is the best play today.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
shaf you misguided blue.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Rel, I really don't trust a thing you say. Looking back on the last day phase didn't you vote for Pavel?relantel wrote:c2i is as bad a play as you are. mac would be a far better play, but still not sold on him over rylan.shafnutz05 wrote:FWIW, mac was also on my list of people that could be bad, based on voting/comments last day phase. But I really think c2i is the best play today.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Why Mac?relantel wrote:c2i is as bad a play as you are. mac would be a far better play, but still not sold on him over rylan.shafnutz05 wrote:FWIW, mac was also on my list of people that could be bad, based on voting/comments last day phase. But I really think c2i is the best play today.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
thg, I did vote pavel. Still don't trust him. I had simply removed shaf from another list containing mac & rylan as well.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I am 95% convinced that relantel and c2i are the last two reds. I have absolutely no idea how he can claim that c2i is a bad play. His recent posts scream to me that he is trying to take the heat off of c2i, whilst also injecting himself as the helpful influence towards the end of the game. I was kind of torn between mac and c2i, but now I am 100% on the c2i train.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Mac was part of the 4 who were voting together. Mac stood out to me when I posted my IE vote and he said IE was tempting but put his vote on TW.MWB wrote:Why Mac?relantel wrote:c2i is as bad a play as you are. mac would be a far better play, but still not sold on him over rylan.shafnutz05 wrote:FWIW, mac was also on my list of people that could be bad, based on voting/comments last day phase. But I really think c2i is the best play today.
IMO mac is the best play this day phase. He was voting with canaan from the start.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I think you're misreading rel.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
That was directed at shafMWB wrote:I think you're misreading rel.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I wouldnt be so quick to clear Rel. He put his vote on PB and in my book that is a no no.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
2 - mac
1- willie kool
1- c2i
1- willie kool
1- c2i
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
No one is clearing rel, but shaf is somewhere between 95-100% convinced he's bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Nothing wrong with that, at this point there are only three people I'd lay money on being blue/green.MWB wrote:No one is clearing rel, but shaf is somewhere between 95-100% convinced he's bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 17,885
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:24 am
- Location: The card table
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
to each his own. There's no point in saying any more. You and Shaf seem hell bent on wasting a day at best, or at worst making things difficult for the village.thehockeyguru wrote:I wouldnt be so quick to clear Rel. He put his vote on PB and in my book that is a no no.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I think it's quite possible the remaining reds would be laying low for a little this day phase to see what comes out.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
At this point, if you're going to come out, do it.relantel wrote:to each his own. There's no point in saying any more. You and Shaf seem hell bent on wasting a day at best, or at worst making things difficult for the village.thehockeyguru wrote:I wouldnt be so quick to clear Rel. He put his vote on PB and in my book that is a no no.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
Who?thehockeyguru wrote:Nothing wrong with that, at this point there are only three people I'd lay money on being blue/green.MWB wrote:No one is clearing rel, but shaf is somewhere between 95-100% convinced he's bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I'm not going to put targets on their backs. But if someone is going to put a vote on them, I am going to look at it very closely.MWB wrote:Who?thehockeyguru wrote:Nothing wrong with that, at this point there are only three people I'd lay money on being blue/green.MWB wrote:No one is clearing rel, but shaf is somewhere between 95-100% convinced he's bad.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,525
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:43 pm
- Location: I'm 30 minutes away, I'll be there in 10.
Re: WWXX GAMEPLAY THREAD
I dont see a vote on Mac as wasting a day, if anything it brings a lot of closure.relantel wrote:to each his own. There's no point in saying any more. You and Shaf seem hell bent on wasting a day at best, or at worst making things difficult for the village.thehockeyguru wrote:I wouldnt be so quick to clear Rel. He put his vote on PB and in my book that is a no no.