Bettman to Refs: Make the calls or else

Forum for hockey posts that are not Penguins-related.
netwolf
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,840
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:04 am

Bettman to Refs: Make the calls or else

Post by netwolf »

"My instructions to Colie and to Stephen are if an official puts his whistle away, they should put the official away for the rest of the playoffs," Bettman said.
http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=163208&hubname=nhl
Sam's Drunk Dog
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 20,587
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:31 am
Location: Shutter Island

Post by Sam's Drunk Dog »

I'm skeptical to see this actually happen. I'll be surprised to say the least if it does.
Ginger
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 1,734
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:32 pm
Location: Basically in my own little world

Re: Bettman to Refs: Make the calls or else

Post by Ginger »

netwolf wrote:
"My instructions to Colie and to Stephen are if an official puts his whistle away, they should put the official away for the rest of the playoffs," Bettman said.
http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=163208&hubname=nhl
Yes! My new tiny hero!

You have to give this man high marks for seeing the problems & trying to fix them against insurmountable odds. Who knows? Maybe if they get used to having good calls made during the playoffs, they may adopt it for the regular season...ya think?
Nah!!! Silly goose me! One can only dream...
Peter

Post by Peter »

Now if Bud Selig only had the balls that Bettman had.
netwolf
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,840
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:04 am

Post by netwolf »

Peter wrote:
Now if Bud Selig only had the balls that Bettman had.
If Selig had ever gotten full support from team owners like Bettman had, his legacy would be different. Instead, he was basically the errand boy for the largemarket owners and no one in MLB ever stood up to that...
Jim
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 19,148
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:18 pm
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by Jim »

If they only actually do this. THE major peoblem with the officiating is that hte refs are never held accountable publically, and that they do not change their style shows they are not held accountable privately either. Actually pulling them from the playoffs would be a MAJOR victory for the game.
the wicked child
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 17,412
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:11 pm
Location: :scared:

Post by the wicked child »

I'm skeptical of the implementation, but I love the idea.
FlyerNation

Post by FlyerNation »

This is the playoffs. How many calls now that shouldn't be made will be simply because the refs are under the gun. I guarantee 90% of games where a team is leading with under 5 left to go there will be some tick tacky call that will be made that probably wouldn't even be made in the regular season. This is the NHL freaking playoffs for christsakes not the NBA where the refs make it a point to be a deciding factor in the game. The cup has always been won by grit and toughness, not penaltyzing a guy for looking at someone the wrong way. This is a joke and it's par for course with the "NEW" NHL.

This could really backfire on them especially when the whole playoffs come down to a special teams show. Why not he's already ruined the league with the gayest gimmick ever in the shootout.
netwolf
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 15,840
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:04 am

Post by netwolf »

FlyerNation wrote:
This is the playoffs. How many calls now that shouldn't be made will be simply because the refs are under the gun. I guarantee 90% of games where a team is leading with under 5 left to go there will be some tick tacky call that will be made that probably wouldn't even be made in the regular season. This is the NHL freaking playoffs for christsakes not the NBA where the refs make it a point to be a deciding factor in the game. The cup has always been won by grit and toughness, not penaltyzing a guy for looking at someone the wrong way. This is a joke and it's par for course with the "NEW" NHL.

This could really backfire on them especially when the whole playoffs come down to a special teams show. Why not he's already ruined the league with the gayest gimmick ever in the shootout.
A penalty call never decides a game; players who decide to take them do. If a player is on a breakaway late in a tie game and is hooked but there's no call, does that not also decide the game? I'm tired of stuff like "that was just a little hook, he shouldn't have called it." Either it was a hook and it was a penalty or it wasn't. No where in the rules does it say hooking is legal if it's just for a second, or didn't pull the guy off stride or anything else. The rule is black and white and should be called as such.

If a game, series, or the Cup is decided by power plays, then the other team shouldn't take penalties or should get better at killing them. The rules are the same as they've alwasy been. Jus because the league has slacked off on the enforcement of them for years doesn't change that.

And if the league was ruined by the shootout, then why is it that everytime I see one on TV or in person, everyone is on their feet and into it?
Ginger
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 1,734
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:32 pm
Location: Basically in my own little world

Post by Ginger »

FlyerNation wrote:
This is the playoffs. How many calls now that shouldn't be made will be simply because the refs are under the gun. I guarantee 90% of games where a team is leading with under 5 left to go there will be some tick tacky call that will be made that probably wouldn't even be made in the regular season. This is the NHL freaking playoffs for christsakes not the NBA where the refs make it a point to be a deciding factor in the game. The cup has always been won by grit and toughness, not penaltyzing a guy for looking at someone the wrong way. This is a joke and it's par for course with the "NEW" NHL.

This could really backfire on them especially when the whole playoffs come down to a special teams show. Why not he's already ruined the league with the gayest gimmick ever in the shootout.
Don't you mean other kind of tick tacky call? 'Cuz the whole reason this is being discussed right now is because the regular season is FILLED with tick-tacky calls that decide the game & shouldn't!
I seem to recall a Cup winning team from Dallas that profited from a tacky call?

And the shootouts, whether you like to admit it or not, are hugely popular! I hated them in the beginning & still don't like them deciding a winning *team* sport. Put five shooters in & I can maybe accept it then...three doesn't work for me. However I'm in the minority there.