I think the editorial board of the PG has made the decision to support our side. After the editorial a few weeks ago, they followed it up with an editorial this week essentially saying what a great thing the two other new stadiums have turned out to be. And they are printing a LOT of letters in support of the Pens, Capri, etc. In Sunday's PG they have two more espousing our point of view.
If we get the PG fully on our side, and it looks like they are, that is an incredibly powerful ally. After all, this is the Democratic mouthpiece that we are talking about here.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06036/649887.stm
More positive letters in the Sunday PG
-
bill from turtle creek
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,686
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:15 pm
- Location: Serenity Now, Serenity Now.
-
Ginger
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,734
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:32 pm
- Location: Basically in my own little world
Re: More positive letters in the Sunday PG
I'm just happy to see they are printing both sides & not leaning to one or the other. This Richard Coyle has summed it up without wasting words & he's absolutely right!bill from turtle creek wrote:I think the editorial board of the PG has made the decision to support our side. After the editorial a few weeks ago, they followed it up with an editorial this week essentially saying what a great thing the two other new stadiums have turned out to be. And they are printing a LOT of letters in support of the Pens, Capri, etc. In Sunday's PG they have two more espousing our point of view.
If we get the PG fully on our side, and it looks like they are, that is an incredibly powerful ally. After all, this is the Democratic mouthpiece that we are talking about here.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06036/649887.stm