Spanier.MRandall25 wrote:Didn't they find reports that Schultz and the other guy (whose name escapes me) hid the abuse because it would be the "humane thing to do for Sandusky"?
Jerry Sandusky and Related Trials
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
mac5155 wrote:Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
lol, he's innocent, they aren't crying on the stand.
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
...seriously?mac5155 wrote:Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Perhaps I watch too much SVU?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Meaning?mac5155 wrote:Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,876
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:41 pm
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
don't know where you got that from mac... second witness broke down crying a couple times, i'v read
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,331
- Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 2:29 pm
- Location: Gasp! The Clamboni!
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Victim #1 broke down and cried on the stand. Nope, that's not too emotional.mac5155 wrote:Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
I believe I read that on channel 11's news. I dont know. I don't really care to follow the trial.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
mac5155 wrote:Something I've heard is they aren't getting too emotional in doing so, though. Just some food for thought.columbia wrote:The witnesses are revealing some pretty salacious details so far....eek.
Do you honestly just think this is some orchestrated conspiracy to bring down the Penn State legacy?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
I would certainly hope not
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,222
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:19 am
- Location: Switch the style up and if they hate, let em hate and watch the money pile up
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Ibtmfl
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,124
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:25 pm
- Location: Gleefully Ignorant
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.Factorial wrote:But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.shafnutz05 wrote:Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.Factorial wrote:But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
he meant that a lack of emotion implies a lack of genuineness. aka lying.Troy Loney wrote:Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.shafnutz05 wrote:Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.Factorial wrote:But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
i don't think mac believes that, he was just throwing something out for conversation
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,124
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:25 pm
- Location: Gleefully Ignorant
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
He's obviously a loyalist and doesn't want to believe the worst. I can understand that.Troy Loney wrote:Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.shafnutz05 wrote:Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.Factorial wrote:But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 48,700
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:06 pm
- Location: governor of Fayettenam
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
Bravo.Factorial wrote:He's obviously a loyalist and doesn't want to believe the worst. I can understand that.Troy Loney wrote:Yeah, I'm curious as to what Mac's train of thought was with that post.shafnutz05 wrote:Sorry, I was referring to Mac's train of thought, and what he was possibly insinuating.Factorial wrote:But you think it's possible that is what is going on? A conspiracy to (insert reason here)?shafnutz05 wrote:I would certainly hope not
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,124
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:25 pm
- Location: Gleefully Ignorant
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
That's letting him off too lightly if the charges are true (which they appear to be).shafnutz05 wrote:I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
shafnutz05 wrote:I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls
What exactly do the loyalists want to do with the people that orchestrated the coverup?
-
- NHL First Liner
- Posts: 60,559
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:10 pm
- Location: Amish Country
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
No love lost for Spanier et al, I assure youTroy Loney wrote:shafnutz05 wrote:I think most Penn State "loyalists" are ready to see this guy hung by his balls
What exactly do the loyalists want to do with the people that orchestrated the coverup?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
After reading through what Witness 1 said about his incidents. Just so sad and disturbing.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 34,732
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:33 pm
- Location: Who is Sims?
Re: Jerry Sandusky Trial
I'm also 100% interested when the case is over, how the actual defense attorney feels defending this high profile of a case. In this light, it's just so terrible to even have to work with or near.