Simpson Warz Game Thread
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
I'm Moe. At this point it doesn't matter though because the last person is the recruit, so it could be anyone. My point is that if we knew who was Mr. Burns and Smithers the first day they would have been our first targets. That's why I was surprised the names matched the roles.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
But none of us thought of that 

-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Two to trust is better than one and the numbers are so low I think the risk/reward is in the village's favor.
If I was red WK, I would have known you were the angel. Why would I then push for the angel to come out, someone who already wants me dead. Would have been a completely stupid move.
If I was red WK, I would have known you were the angel. Why would I then push for the angel to come out, someone who already wants me dead. Would have been a completely stupid move.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Not a lot of heat on either of them. Minimal participation. Kind of just flying under the radar. That would be a perfect type of recruit.MWB wrote:Why them?newarenanow wrote:I'm between Rylan and ulf. Have to go back and look at a few things.
I know I'm going to get heat for this, but I'll put it out there anyway. The angel and vig should come out. We have seven left. If we can eliminate two suspects, that leaves us only five. Having two trusted players would really help right now.
I am with you though on the vig and angel outing themselves. It would take away 2 threats as I don't think a great would be recruited. (I personally think the reds tried to kill night 1 and found WK (the angel), tried to recruit on Day 2 and found the vig, but a green can't be recruited, and finally got their recruit on day 3).
So with 2 people outed, that only leaves 5 as a suspect.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
When is the deadline? Participation is hurting the village now.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Deadline is at 4. I have given my .02 and as I stated I have leanings but not enough to vote at the moment.
To refresh, I am down to either MWB or TL as people I feel are potentials with ulf on the outside looking in.
To refresh, I am down to either MWB or TL as people I feel are potentials with ulf on the outside looking in.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Yeah, TL and his 'slow down' as he voted would be the only other thing that jumps out at me from day 4.Rylan wrote:I am down to either MWB or TL as people I feel are potentials with ulf on the outside looking in.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
I got nothing, just don't vote for me.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
But I think MWB's twice trying to distract from the possibility / timing of the recruit has me locked on him for today.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 42,356
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:56 pm
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
I really think Rylan is the last bad guy.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,046
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:18 am
- Location: Kansas City
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
I'm lost, if I were to vote now I'd just be going off my gut
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
You really need to open your thinking a bit. You're completely locked in on me and ignoring anything logical that would point away from me. I'm blue, and it's not a big deal if I'm offed, but you need to not just focus in on one person and only look for evidence to prove yourself right.Willie Kool wrote:But I think MWB's twice trying to distract from the possibility / timing of the recruit has me locked on him for today.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
That is the thing I pointed about as suspicious about TL.Willie Kool wrote:Yeah, TL and his 'slow down' as he voted would be the only other thing that jumps out at me from day 4.Rylan wrote:I am down to either MWB or TL as people I feel are potentials with ulf on the outside looking in.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
I already outlined the reason you should be suspicious of me, but that has been ignored.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Lynch rylan
Color
Deadline looming, and he seems to be not contributing much and just throwing out names.
Color
Deadline looming, and he seems to be not contributing much and just throwing out names.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,216
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Dead and Without Love
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Well between TL giving hints as to his identity that leaves MWB as my vote.
Yellow MWB
Yellow MWB
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,046
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:18 am
- Location: Kansas City
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
MWB wrote:Lynch rylan
Color
Deadline looming, and he seems to be not contributing much and just throwing out names.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Lynch MWB
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,046
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:18 am
- Location: Kansas City
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Code: Select all
Vote
2 - MWB (WK, Rylan)
2 - rylan (nan, MWB)
Limit is 4. Deadline is 4PM.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
OK. Explain to me how you could actually think that the reds didn't get a kill for the first three nights just because it was such a small game. Seems to me that would be a HUGE advantage for the village, so much so that, IMO, you couldn't have honestly concluded that. I've looked back at everything else, and you're still the best play I can see.MWB wrote:You really need to open your thinking a bit. You're completely locked in on me and ignoring anything logical that would point away from me. I'm blue, and it's not a big deal if I'm offed, but you need to not just focus in on one person and only look for evidence to prove yourself right.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,046
- Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:18 am
- Location: Kansas City
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
That leaves myself, ulf, & TL to vote.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 28,922
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 9:10 am
- Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
No it doesn't
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
Because that all seems to have happened before the recruit.Troy Loney wrote:I already outlined the reason you should be suspicious of me, but that has been ignored.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 15,747
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 12:36 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Simpson Warz Game Thread
When someone pointed out the save night one I adjusted that thinking. Maybe one kill in the first three nights. That was just thrown out as a possibility. And I still think its possible. I just thought it would be a way to slow down a small game.Willie Kool wrote:OK. Explain to me how you could actually think that the reds didn't get a kill for the first three nights just because it was such a small game. Seems to me that would be a HUGE advantage for the village, so much so that, IMO, you couldn't have honestly concluded that. I've looked back at everything else, and you're still the best play I can see.MWB wrote:You really need to open your thinking a bit. You're completely locked in on me and ignoring anything logical that would point away from me. I'm blue, and it's not a big deal if I'm offed, but you need to not just focus in on one person and only look for evidence to prove yourself right.
I voted second on red. I made several points that you have also followed. I made points that you say would implicate myself (in other words, I outed myself). I would just think that would outweigh bringing up scenarios for a small game.