WBS - Can't Score
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,998
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: UPMC - Universal Pens Mojo Council
WBS - Can't Score
I read JB's column's in the Citizen's Voice about the Baby Pens. A very streaky team this year. Right now, they can't score. They've got it real bad. When you take away Tangradi, Bennett and add a few injuries, it spells trouble. Just how deep are the Pens at the forward position when you consider the WBS situation?
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,298
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:49 am
- Location: Freddy Beach
Re: WBS - Can't Score
They aren't. There's absolutely no forward depth in the organization.Penspal wrote:I read JB's column's in the Citizen's Voice about the Baby Pens. A very streaky team this year. Right now, they can't score. They've got it real bad. When you take away Tangradi, Bennett and add a few injuries, it spells trouble. Just how deep are the Pens at the forward position when you consider the WBS situation?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: WBS - Can't Score
No one thought there was any depth at forward in the Pens system.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,414
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:02 pm
- Location: Fire Sullivan
Re: WBS - Can't Score
We really screw'd F wise on WBS. No depth,no scoring.. Really poor!
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,998
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: UPMC - Universal Pens Mojo Council
Re: WBS - Can't Score
Kolarik came over in the minor league swap with the Rangers. He's been scoring a little, curious as to what he could do with skill players.Pens4Life wrote:We really screw'd F wise on WBS. No depth,no scoring.. Really poor!
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,876
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
- Location: Sitting in front of my computer
Re: WBS - Can't Score
Went to the game on Saturday night. Great depth on D, bunch of nobodies at forward.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,298
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:49 am
- Location: Freddy Beach
Re: WBS - Can't Score
As I had been saying about Tangradi, there was a very clear reason they weren't willing to risk him on waivers. With the complete absence of forward depth in WBS, they had to get something in return if they were going to lose/move him. A 7th rounder is still better than nothing at all.Pens4Life wrote:We really screw'd F wise on WBS. No depth,no scoring.. Really poor!
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: WBS - Can't Score
tfrizz wrote:As I had been saying about Tangradi, there was a very clear reason they weren't willing to risk him on waivers. With the complete absence of forward depth in WBS, they had to get something in return if they were going to lose/move him. A 7th rounder is still better than nothing at all...which is better than Tangradi.Pens4Life wrote:We really screw'd F wise on WBS. No depth,no scoring.. Really poor!

-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,298
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:49 am
- Location: Freddy Beach
Re: WBS - Can't Score
I don't know about that. Many 7th round picks are an extreme longshot to even make it to pro hockey let alone have any impact. It's about as close as you can get to nothing while still getting something in return. (1/1000000 > 0)Idoit40fans wrote:tfrizz wrote:As I had been saying about Tangradi, there was a very clear reason they weren't willing to risk him on waivers. With the complete absence of forward depth in WBS, they had to get something in return if they were going to lose/move him. A 7th rounder is still better than nothing at all...which is better than Tangradi.Pens4Life wrote:We really screw'd F wise on WBS. No depth,no scoring.. Really poor!
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: WBS - Can't Score
tfrizz wrote:I don't know about that. Many 7th round picks are an extreme longshot to even make it to pro hockey let alone have any impact. It's about as close as you can get to nothing while still getting something in return. (1/1000000 > Tangradi)Idoit40fans wrote:tfrizz wrote:As I had been saying about Tangradi, there was a very clear reason they weren't willing to risk him on waivers. With the complete absence of forward depth in WBS, they had to get something in return if they were going to lose/move him. A 7th rounder is still better than nothing at all...which is better than Tangradi.Pens4Life wrote:We really screw'd F wise on WBS. No depth,no scoring.. Really poor!

-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: WBS - Can't Score
I actually started at 2008 and went back to 2004. There are pretty meaningful players drafted in the 7th round from every season. I think 2004 was the last year of 9 round drafts, and you can find a lot of people 7 and below that contribute from that draft. I'd say the odds are a whole lot better than 1/1000000. More around 1/100 or better.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,298
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:49 am
- Location: Freddy Beach
Re: WBS - Can't Score
I have no doubt the odds are better than that, I just used that to say that a one-in-a-million chance is better than none.Idoit40fans wrote:I actually started at 2008 and went back to 2004. There are pretty meaningful players drafted in the 7th round from every season. I think 2004 was the last year of 9 round drafts, and you can find a lot of people 7 and below that contribute from that draft. I'd say the odds are a whole lot better than 1/1000000. More around 1/100 or better.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 24,978
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 2:59 pm
- Location: The Panda Will Fly Away On A Rainbow
Re: WBS - Can't Score
How has zatkoff been playing?