***Secret Agent Warz GAME THREAD***

[Rylan]

Anyway, do we think MRandall was on to something or is this a red herring?

[MWB]

He isn't dead.

Are you an expert?

[Rylan]

He isn't dead.

Are you an expert?

lol Kaizer had just said something before you posted and I was being a smart ass. Though doesn't burn notices mean that he will eventually get killed?

[MRandall25]

I know you guys aren't supposed to listen to me, but I'd look at that list I posted. Something's wrong here.

[MWB]

Anyway, do we think MRandall was on to something or is this a red herring?

I think this was something sent by reds to confuse.

[MRandall25]

Maybe "Excalibur" is actually the red organization, and we're just pawns in a greater scheme of things.

[Rylan]

Anyway, do we think MRandall was on to something or is this a red herring?

I think this was something sent by reds to confuse.

I agree. Chances are he named a red, but if you suspect a 1/3 of the game that gives you half decent odds.

[MWB]

Maybe "Excalibur" is actually the red organization, and we're just pawns in a greater scheme of things.

So the initial write-up was part of the cover up?

[columbia]

My bad on the count....I thought we had started with 20 players.

[Rylan]

PB is someone that could be a suspect. It was really him and Slappy on day 1, though while it was still early I think they figured safe than sorry. During the night they burn MRandall as a red herring for us to look into the 5 or 6 he named thus keeping PB out of the spotlight permanently...thoughts?

[MRandall25]

Maybe "Excalibur" is actually the red organization, and we're just pawns in a greater scheme of things.

So the initial write-up was part of the cover up?

Why would I be burn noticed? I didn't vote anyone. I didn't out a green. I simply laid my suspicion on people.

If it were a Night phase, why didn't the reds get a kill (unless the truncated day phase was their kill).

[columbia]

As for this non-communication thing....

It seems unlikely that:

1.) This was triggered by any actions
2.) The greens would have the power to do it. I can vaguely imagine that, but why would a green invoke such a power this early in the game and somewhat randomly?


That's the long version of saying that I don't think that MR25 is red.

Him accusing 1/3 of the game of being red is another story.

[MRandall25]

There should be a question mark after the last sentence.

[Rylan]

I think the reds hoped he would just shut up

[MRandall25]

I said 2 of the 5 were red, so I'm only accusing 12% as opposed to 33%

[columbia]

I think the reds hoped he would just shut up

For lack of a better theory, I assume that the reds did it to him.
Why him? I have no idea.

[MWB]

Maybe "Excalibur" is actually the red organization, and we're just pawns in a greater scheme of things.

So the initial write-up was part of the cover up?

Why would I be burn noticed? I didn't vote anyone. I didn't out a green. I simply laid my suspicion on people.

If it were a Night phase, why didn't the reds get a kill (unless the truncated day phase was their kill).

I don't know what a burn notice is.

I think the day kill probably took the place of a night kill. Otherwise that would be a lot of red power.

[MRandall25]

Maybe "Excalibur" is actually the red organization, and we're just pawns in a greater scheme of things.

So the initial write-up was part of the cover up?

Why would I be burn noticed? I didn't vote anyone. I didn't out a green. I simply laid my suspicion on people.

If it were a Night phase, why didn't the reds get a kill (unless the truncated day phase was their kill).

I don't know what a burn notice is.

I think the day kill probably took the place of a night kill. Otherwise that would be a lot of red power.

Basically the organization is saying they want nothing to do with me and they find me unreliable.

[Rylan]

A burn notice is an official statement issued by an intelligence agency to other agencies. It states that an asset or intelligence source is unreliable for one or more reasons.[1] This is essentially a directive for the recipient to disregard or "burn" all information derived from that individual or group.

[MWB]

So it just officially confirms what we all felt anyway.
:pop:

[redwill]

For lack of a better theory, I assume that the reds did it to him.

It doesn't seem to be having any tangible effect, though.

[columbia]

For lack of a better theory, I assume that the reds did it to him.

It doesn't seem to be having any tangible effect, though.

I think Nizzy had the real burn notice in the prospects thread.

[MRandall25]

Fine, I'll drop out then. Have fun.

[MRandall25]

I will say this though:

If it was the greens who put a burn notice on me, congrats. You wasted a night phase.

[Kaizer]

deadline is 2pm tommorow