Sounds like canaan to me.MWB wrote:Sounds like shaf to me.canaan wrote:History of idealism, bucking authority, many reprimands on file.
end

C'mon, canaan, give us the name.
Sounds like canaan to me.MWB wrote:Sounds like shaf to me.canaan wrote:History of idealism, bucking authority, many reprimands on file.
end
Why would they come out and tell you? Heck I don't know why you came out and told us as opposed to trying to get the person the supposed info is on to start talking before saying anything.canaan wrote:I want to see if anybody else has received a message
my reasoning is two fold: 1. To try and get to the bottom of the structure to the game, and 2. See what baddies get argumentative and combative with the information I have.Pavel Bure wrote:Why would they come out and tell you? Heck I don't know why you came out and told us as opposed to trying to get the person the supposed info is on to start talking before saying anything.canaan wrote:I want to see if anybody else has received a message
So instead Agent Blue it came up with someone else's like Agent Fetish?canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
I'm inclined to ignore this right now then. No real name, no real info, just confusing garbage.canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
the name I was given for the player was Ulysses Tyler. That mean anything to anybody?Rylan wrote:So instead Agent Blue it came up with someone else's like Agent Fetish?canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
It just makes little sense, why would they get combative or argue about it if it gives no real name and no real info. It'd be silly for them to argue over something that currently means absolutely nothing. Like I said above I'm inclined to ignore this claim right now because it tells us nothing currently.canaan wrote:my reasoning is two fold: 1. To try and get to the bottom of the structure to the game, and 2. See what baddies get argumentative and combative with the information I have.Pavel Bure wrote:Why would they come out and tell you? Heck I don't know why you came out and told us as opposed to trying to get the person the supposed info is on to start talking before saying anything.canaan wrote:I want to see if anybody else has received a message
that's rather obtuse of you to ignore information because you weren't given all the information you wanted right awayPavel Bure wrote:I'm inclined to ignore this right now then. No real name, no real info, just confusing garbage.canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
Yea, seems shady to me.Willie Kool wrote:The letter from the reds threatening to bring down Excalibur in the original write up was also left on Jehovah's desk...
How so?canaan wrote:that's rather obtuse of you to ignore information because you weren't given all the information you wanted right awayPavel Bure wrote:I'm inclined to ignore this right now then. No real name, no real info, just confusing garbage.canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
calling it garbage and a distraction is very dismissive of the information im providing. If it doesn't help you, then fine. This game is, thankfully, a team effort. Just because the information doesn't assist you, doesn't mean that its not important to be out for public consumption.Pavel Bure wrote:How so?canaan wrote:that's rather obtuse of you to ignore information because you weren't given all the information you wanted right awayPavel Bure wrote:I'm inclined to ignore this right now then. No real name, no real info, just confusing garbage.canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
We ask who's name was on it and you say the alias doesn't match anyone's name in the game. Therefore it is nothing right now and just a chance to cause confusion. Unless you get more messages or something concrete it's nothing but a distraction right now.
Let's just do this. Is the name one of the ones listed to start the game. That way you don't have to reveal the name but there's some actual info.canaan wrote:This is why I didn't want to give the players name right away because I was suspicious of where the letter came from
why tfrizz?canaan wrote:Kaiser, I voted for tfrizz but it wasn't yellow. Dunno if it was missed or intentionally denied.
canaan wrote:the name I was given for the player was Ulysses Tyler. That mean anything to anybody?Rylan wrote:So instead Agent Blue it came up with someone else's like Agent Fetish?canaan wrote:I almost forgot...the alias that I was given for the agent does not match the call name that is listed in the player list. I found that strange/curious.
I quoted one of his posts earlier in the game I found particularly odd. He didn't respond to it. Hunch/feeling is all.Rylan wrote:why tfrizz?canaan wrote:Kaiser, I voted for tfrizz but it wasn't yellow. Dunno if it was missed or intentionally denied.
If the person with this name is town I for sure wouldn't say anything because I feel like that risks someone who is most likely a role player(because why would you get a memo on someone who was nothing) and obviously if they're red they're not going to say anything. I guess this could be useful later in the game if someone tries to role-claim and someone else could out them.canaan wrote:the name I was given for the player was Ulysses Tyler. That mean anything to anybody?