LGP Fantasy Hockey Keeper League

[Letang Is The Truth]

+ granlund?

[Troy Loney]

so is hammer repicking?

[Letang Is The Truth]

I am ready to pick just awaiting consensus decision

[TheHammer24]

I'll pick again. That's fine. LITT's point that he would have drafted Granlund persuades me that's right.

But this has been decided---that going forward we were going to adopt the you-lose-your-rookie approach.

To this point, we had a lot of trouble with people not including their rookie keepers in the spreadsheet, then stopping people from making this pick. I think I said that this year an owner that does not include a rookie-keeping-eligibility keeper on the spreadsheet by the deadline loses that keeper.

Here's a sample from last year, when this exact problem happened:

I do agree that moving forward, if the players aren't documented, you lose them.

Me too.

And with respect to me picking someone that has been chosen, I absolutely would not be able to rewind the draft had no one noticed I made the incorrect pick, although I see that's less severe than a complete forfeit.

[Letang Is The Truth]

If we decided that we were doing tough **** approach I think your pick should stand - its my fault for not knowing that

[Pitts]

If we decided that we were doing tough **** approach I think your pick should stand - its my fault for not knowing that

I believe Azkar himself is on board with this by his recent reply in this thread.

[Azkar]

Granlund is a bum anyway.

[Pitts]

lol

I say Hammer keeps Granlund (he can edit this pick back) and LITT is up.

Let's roll!

[Pitts]

Added to the "Keepr Rules" page of the Google doc:

9/17/13 - If you do not declare all your rookies on the current year keeper list, those not "kept" enter the UFA pool and can be re-drafted by any team. Henceforth known as the "Tough ***" rule.

Only question is, if you re-draft a player who has not met the rookie games played total, are they drafted as a rookie still? (Granlund)

[TheHammer24]

Sounds good to me.

[Letang Is The Truth]

To me he is still a rookie

[Pitts]

To me he is still a rookie

Agree, I'll add that to the rule. That would mean Hammer is using one of this 4 rookie picks then?

[Idoit40fans]

Definitely still a rookie.

[Letang Is The Truth]

Also for the record - etem is also taken lol

[Pitts]

Also for the record - etem is also taken lol

I assumed so, but could not find him on the keeper's page!

[Azkar]

bhaw drafted him in 2011

[TheHammer24]

Granlund is a rookie. ugh on Etem. UPDATE!

[Idoit40fans]

This is the 4th year in a row that Etem has been drafted. 2nd in a row that Hammer drafted him. http://www.letsgopens.com/scripts/phpBB ... m#p2276317" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Pitts]

Hammer needs to edit his pick back the Granlund

[TheHammer24]

Granlund is a rookie. ugh on Etem. UPDATE!

[Letang Is The Truth]

This is the 4th year in a row that Etem has been drafted. 2nd in a row that Hammer drafted him. http://www.letsgopens.com/scripts/phpBB ... m#p2276317" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Lol

[Idoit40fans]

Why was it changed from Granlund?

[Pitts]

This is too funny.

[Pitts]

Why was it changed from Granlund?

Hammer changed it to etem before our vote for him to keep granlund. He's back to Granlund, so all is good.

As for Etem, though ....

[Troy Loney]

So etem still isn't listed on the keepers page. lol