*** Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT ***

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:50 pm

relantel wrote:
slappybrown wrote:
Fair enough, I was working on the assumption that only blues got a package.
TWC's OP said all players have a chance to visit the sloogery... so possession of package says nothing about alignment.

Right, which is why I posted what I did. I didn't realize that when I assumed otherwise.

tfrizz · Post by **tfrizz** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:51 pm

MRandall25 wrote:
CBear3
columbia
Crankshaft
Gaucho
Juice
Kaizer
MRandall25
newarenanow
obhave
redwill
relantel
Rylan
slappybrown
tfrizz
the errey i breathe
Willie Kool
Zarovich

I'd like to hear more from Zaro, Rylan, tfrizz, and Juice, if possible.

Aside from throwing votes on, they haven't really contributed too much up until this point.

I've been busy with work today. I skimmed through while eating lunch, but going to try to catch up once I get home.

MRandall25 · Post by **MRandall25** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:51 pm

slappybrown wrote:
MRandall25 wrote:
You mean you didn't see canaans rather obvious role claim during the day phase?
What does canaan's role claim have to do with using the package and then passing the potato? It all happened way before that.

That was a bit unclear. I was under the assumption all of the potato stuff happened in the last phase

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:52 pm

MRandall25 wrote:
slappybrown wrote:
MRandall25 wrote:
You mean you didn't see canaans rather obvious role claim during the day phase?
What does canaan's role claim have to do with using the package and then passing the potato? It all happened way before that.
That was a bit unclear. I was under the assumption all of the potato stuff happened in the last phase

I have no idea what limitations Crankshaft had in terms of using the hot potato. I could use it at anytime. I assume he could too.

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:53 pm

Then again, shad died at night. So maybe Crank could only use it at night? I also don't know when the mods communicated that Crankshaft had received the potato from me. So its hard to extrapolate anything from the timing once I PM the mods his name.

MRandall25 · Post by **MRandall25** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:58 pm

and, if I understand correctly, you passed it prior to the last day phase?

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:00 pm

Friday morning.

the errey i breathe · Post by **the errey i breathe** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:00 pm

net Cbear
something just seems off, I'm not married to this vote, but I'll be busy this afternoon and want to get my opinion out there

MRandall25 · Post by **MRandall25** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:04 pm

canaan wrote:
Sam's Drunk Dog wrote:
My vote on crankshaft initally was just joining in on a bandwagon. I felt his "role claim" to be weak and didn't want to remove any future suspicion from him by removing my vote. I switched to mac after his hunch about EPP proved unfounded. I haven't had enough time to read through today but I am leaning towards canaan or crank.
you're barking up the wrong tree on both accounts

That was Friday at 11:30ish

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:04 pm

Sure was.

Post by **the wicked child** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:21 pm

the wicked child wrote:
6 slappy - cbear, redwill, Crankshaft, Kaizer, relantel, nan
1 Rylan - obhave
2 cbear - wk, errey
1 wk - columbia

9 to net.

slappybrown · Post by **slappybrown** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:42 pm

net cbear in the interests of self-preservation.

Gaucho, I didn't understand your comment about cbear and the 'red" comment.

Post by **Gaucho** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:52 pm

slappybrown wrote:
net cbear in the interests of self-preservation.

Gaucho, I didn't understand your comment about cbear and the 'red" comment.

When rel couldn't or wouldn't vote for you he commented it might indicate you were red, which for some reason would be "unfair". It just seemed odd, but I probably just misunderstood it.

CBear3 · Post by **CBear3** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:58 pm

Yep. I thought that being told you can't vote for person x wouldn't be a very balanced defense mechanism for the reds:
A) singling out one player would make it very obvious
and B) being able to tell the village that you can't vote for somebody tips them all off.

It doesn't seem like it would be a good defensive ability to be given to reds.

It's the one qualm I had in voting for slappy. Then he announced that you passed the hot potato off to Crank and I felt better.

Off to another meeting, give me an hour. I hate getting back from a trip.

CBear3 · Post by **CBear3** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:59 pm

Mixed up some pronouns there, but you get the point.

Post by **the wicked child** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:01 pm

6 slappy - cbear, redwill, Crankshaft, Kaizer, relantel, nan
1 Rylan - obhave
3 cbear - wk, errey,slappy
1 wk - columbia

9 to net.

Post by **Gaucho** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:13 pm

CBear3 wrote:
Mixed up some pronouns there, but you get the point.

Yup, gotcha. And I agree.

Post by **relantel** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:49 pm

would not be surprised if the slappy-cbear choice was red-red.

tfrizz · Post by **tfrizz** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:57 pm

Ugh, every time I open this thread a new request pops up at work. Finally caught up, but not sure who to vote for. I'd hate to jump on the slappy bandwagon if Willie's argument for CBear is legit, so I'll take a look back when I get home.

obhave · Post by **obhave** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:18 pm

relantel wrote:
would not be surprised if the slappy-cbear choice was red-red.

I personally this it is blue-blue. Which is why I don't want to throw a vote on either of them.

obhave · Post by **obhave** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:18 pm

*think not this.

CBear3 · Post by **CBear3** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:24 pm

WK's argument for me is legit.
I did vote after he pointed out the odds are 3x greater that a green would post soon after a write-up. Canaan goes on to say why would he send in an action and then immediately post...which it turns out he did. WK's "odds" however don't take into account that there are likely to be at least three reds PM'ing back and forth, trying to reach an agreement on their one night move; while the only thing a green has to do is pick a name for himself. It's like saying the chances of rain today are 50-50; either it'll rain or not. It ignores the actions behind the scenes that underlie the reasons it would rain or not.

Post by **Willie Kool** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:37 pm

Or a green could be busy and/or away from the computer. I still think it's far more likely to out a green with that logic than a red.

CBear3 · Post by **CBear3** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 4:41 pm

It certainly turned out that way, but I think your odds are misleading. But, it's also not the only reason I voted for canaan once.

Post by **Willie Kool** » Mon Oct 28, 2013 6:10 pm

Just a thought as I was looking back:

Top of page 7 -

the wicked child wrote:
7 Epp - mac, juice , mrandall, MWB, obhave, tfrizz, columbia
4 mac - redwill, canaan, nan , shaf
3 Canaan - teib, epp, cbear
2 Teib - zaro, willie
1 Crankshaft - sdd
1 tfrizz - Rylan
1 MWB - Gaucho

12 to net. Deadline is 9:30 am.

Followed by -

shafnutz05 wrote:
release mac

net EPP

I'm still not entirely sure how this vote took off with it being mac's "hunch", but I'd rather just get to 12 than have the "sloog protocol" dictate things.

So, why would shad care about it going to random if there were no reds in the mix? EPP, mac, canaan and MWB are now dead and blue or green. That leaves teib, Crank and tfrizz as possible reds that shad didn't want in a random vote.

* Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *

Re: * Jellyfish Invasion III: Return of the Sloogs GDT *