LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
bad doesn't necessarily mean evil, both are very subjective. I think of evil as just a higher degree of bad.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
I dont think evil can exist outside of a spiritual existence. Without spirituality evil is, as c2i said, just a higher degree of bad.count2infinity wrote:bad doesn't necessarily mean evil, both are very subjective. I think of evil as just a higher degree of bad.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
I'm not sure if this is the place to post this but it seemed right...
My wife and I were discussing a rhetorical question last night.
What would the world be like if women were the dominant sex throughout history?
It's very hard to answer that question because the fact that men are inherently bigger and stronger than women means that it was impossible for women to be the dominant sex because when "advanced civilization" started roughly 10k-15k years ago the bigger and stronger you were made all of the difference.
But let's assume that physical stature was reversed. I'm not saying we assume that every woman would be amazon and every man a little person. Let us just assume that the ratio of size between women and men in this scenario is the same as it is in real life except that women are the larger sex.
Would our history be virtually the same because of pure human nature? Would it be drastically different because of the natural psychological differences in men and women?
My wife and I were discussing a rhetorical question last night.
What would the world be like if women were the dominant sex throughout history?
It's very hard to answer that question because the fact that men are inherently bigger and stronger than women means that it was impossible for women to be the dominant sex because when "advanced civilization" started roughly 10k-15k years ago the bigger and stronger you were made all of the difference.
But let's assume that physical stature was reversed. I'm not saying we assume that every woman would be amazon and every man a little person. Let us just assume that the ratio of size between women and men in this scenario is the same as it is in real life except that women are the larger sex.
Would our history be virtually the same because of pure human nature? Would it be drastically different because of the natural psychological differences in men and women?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
To assume that women would be the ones that come to power and then say "the natural psychological differences in men and women" are sort of counter to each other. There are natural psychological and physical traits that contribute to men coming to power rather than women in the past and even in the present. If you reverse the physical traits, I think that in and of itself has an effect on the psychology of the genders as well.
Now as far as assuming this situation is possible that women were in charge with their current psychological state, I'm not sure how the world would turn out. I'd like to think it'd be pretty similar as it is today, but I have a tough time envisioning that hypothetical situation just based on what we know about physiology, anthropology and psychology.
Now as far as assuming this situation is possible that women were in charge with their current psychological state, I'm not sure how the world would turn out. I'd like to think it'd be pretty similar as it is today, but I have a tough time envisioning that hypothetical situation just based on what we know about physiology, anthropology and psychology.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
I totally agree and it was very hard to discuss because I kept coming back to "this is impossible". Most rhetorical questions are at least possible if not extremely unlikely.count2infinity wrote:To assume that women would be the ones that come to power and then say "the natural psychological differences in men and women" are sort of counter to each other. There are natural psychological and physical traits that contribute to men coming to power rather than women in the past and even in the present. If you reverse the physical traits, I think that in and of itself has an effect on the psychology of the genders as well.
Now as far as assuming this situation is possible that women were in charge with their current psychological state, I'm not sure how the world would turn out. I'd like to think it'd be pretty similar as it is today, but I have a tough time envisioning that hypothetical situation just based on what we know about physiology, anthropology and psychology.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
It seems like one needs to think about this question: Does the presence of testosterone make men far more likely to kill?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
if we're keeping the fact that women are the ones who have the babies, i can't picture this premise making any sense - even hypothetically.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,292
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:18 pm
- Location: I say stupid things. You have been warned
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
Well, it's like the famous Roman poet so poignantly stated:
Men go to college to get more knowledge,
Women go to Jupiter to get more stupider
Men go to college to get more knowledge,
Women go to Jupiter to get more stupider
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
[youtube][/youtube]
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
you trying to tell me that MIMH isn't really responsible for the posts he makes?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
yes, that ^
edit...referring to the video. but it also applies to c2i. but make no mistake, he should definitely be held accountable, even if he's not responsible.
edit...referring to the video. but it also applies to c2i. but make no mistake, he should definitely be held accountable, even if he's not responsible.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,292
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:18 pm
- Location: I say stupid things. You have been warned
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
don't get me wrong, I love physics, have a physics degree, etc. but to think that we completely understand the universe and specifically the concept of free will especially with how it interacts with our brains and whatnot is hard for me to believe.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
he's not saying we understand free will, it's just that nothing in the world as we see it through the laws of physics (or all science) points to free will being a possibility. As always with science, he reserves the right to change his mind based upon new information, but everything we have right now suggests it doesn't exist.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 51,889
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:13 pm
- Location: دعنا نذهب طيور البطريق
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
Kraftster will like that video.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
So it wouldn't be considered free will if I walked into the kitchen where my mom is currently setting up dinner plates, grabbed one of the plates, and chucked it off the wall (not that I'm going to actually do that)?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
you're not going to right? why not? and who's to say that what you just typed wasn't just a predetermined response based on the way your brain is wired to the discussion?
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
MR25...always throwing platesa fit
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
Purple monkey dishwasher.count2infinity wrote:you're not going to right? why not? and who's to say that what you just typed wasn't just a predetermined response based on the way your brain is wired to the discussion?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,292
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:18 pm
- Location: I say stupid things. You have been warned
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
I don't need free will, I just need the illusion of free will
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
something.gif
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 19,694
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:11 pm
- Location: BOBROVSKY!!!
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
I just turned the TV on. Are you/is that video saying my brain was wired to turn the TV on because of the situation (sitting on my couch, working on my laptop, relatively in silence)? It wasn't actually my choice to turn it on?
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,133
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 1:39 am
- Location: Minneapolis, MN
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
If we had enough information, and took into account all of the experience and variables and choices that have been made in your life, if and when you do decided to do anything could be predicted. So did you ever really make a choice to turn the tv on?MRandall25 wrote:I just turned the TV on. Are you/is that video saying my brain was wired to turn the TV on because of the situation (sitting on my couch, working on my laptop, relatively in silence)? It wasn't actually my choice to turn it on?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,292
- Joined: Sat Apr 06, 2013 3:18 pm
- Location: I say stupid things. You have been warned
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
so are you telling me that I don't actually get to choose my destiny?


-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: LGP Philosophy Discussion Thread
If you replayed your life infinity times it would turn out exactly the same way every time. Furthermore, if you replayed everything that happened after the Big Bang infinity times, it would play out the exact same way every time. There is no randomness. No chance. You're playing a part in a script that you haven't read, but is already written.