It isthehockeyguru wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:07 pmIs our 1st rounder this season that was traded to SJ top 10 protected?

It isthehockeyguru wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:07 pmIs our 1st rounder this season that was traded to SJ top 10 protected?
It depends. We traded this year's 1st, but it is lottery protected. So essentially, we cannot trade our 2024 or 2025 1st round pick until the condition is finalized.KG wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:31 pmIt isthehockeyguru wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 2:07 pmIs our 1st rounder this season that was traded to SJ top 10 protected?![]()
This team's PP might need a little less chemistry and a lot more selfishness. 1 or 2 safe passes followed by shots and rebounds. The biggest problem is the players and coaches need to stop thinking the core can make passes now that they did a decade ago.dark_forces wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:03 pmThis very much reminds me of pre-salary cap era NY Ranger teams. They go out and sign the stars, the name players, and their teams were largely average with little chemistry and didn't score anywhere near what they were projected to. Sound familiar?KG wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:17 pm30th ranked power play almost into February. Crosby, Jake, Geno, Karlsson on it. Reirden, we thank you for your efforts, but we are going to move the power play to someone else. Because if the power play doesn't turn around, we will not make the playoffs again.
Why this hasn't happened yet, is beyond me.
Although I liked the brass to go out and acquire Karlsson, my initial personal reaction was—we don't really need him. We need playoff style players to round out the lineup, not more stars who score a lot in the regular season, but when they don't score, they don't really bring much else.
I was just thinking this the other day. I would extend your observation to the coaches too. They are always dressed very well—professional and polished. Contrast that with NFL coaches who have increasingly dressed down and look like lazy dads who just got up from lounging around the house in their hoodies and sweatpants. And, don't get me started on NBA players who now look no different than common prison yard thugs.Wyopen wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:06 pmI admire the fact that hockey players arrive at arena in suits. I think this is only sport that does this, very professional. Just a random fodder.
Very true..dark_forces wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:57 pmI was just thinking this the other day. I would extend your observation to the coaches too. They are always dressed very well—professional and polished. Contrast that with NFL coaches who have increasingly dressed down and look like lazy dads who just got up from lounging around the house in their hoodies and sweatpants. And, don't get me started on NBA players who now look no different than common prison yard thugs.Wyopen wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:06 pmI admire the fact that hockey players arrive at arena in suits. I think this is only sport that does this, very professional. Just a random fodder.
Football players in Europe usually does it too. At least most in the higher leagues like Premier league, La liga and Serie A.Wyopen wrote: Mon Jan 22, 2024 7:06 pmI admire the fact that hockey players arrive at arena in suits. I think this is only sport that does this, very professional. Just a random fodder.
I mean if you want to fire the coach, I have no issues with that. However the question remains, how much good will it do? The players from 87 on down want to play like its 2015. If you bring someone in that tries to implement a more defensive system, they will revolt like they did under Therrien and Johnston. I think you need to move some people by trades in order to get their attention. That's Guentzel and Rakell since their contracts allow them to be moved to most teams.KG wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:13 amhttps://pittsburghhockeynow.com/pittsbu ... is-letang/#
Why does the Pittsburgh media never mention maybe firing the coach is the short-term solution to help save the season? Think it worked pretty well for Edmonton!
I'm on board with this. I don't see them firing Sullivan. I don't see them trading Jake either—more because of keeping Crosby happy than anything else. But I could see them dealing Rakell, Smith, Eller, Acciari, POJ, Nieto for picks, maybe get a younger NHLer back (in Rakell's case) and fill holes another way in the offseason.ahawk9 wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:36 amI'm hoping they stay at least in the playoff hunt so they can offload that No. 1 to San Jose this year. I don't want to gamble that they'll be any better down the road.
That said, they can recoup a No. 1 & more by trading Jake. They also can deal Rakell for something, Smith, Eller, Acciari also. They can amass some picks and younger prospects (almost any young prospect should be attractive to this organization). Play the young guys and see who sticks so you know what you are dealing with come the offseason.
That's all pie-in-the-sky stuff, btw. They won't even fire Sullivan, so why would I think that they'd make some moves that might actually help the team next year. They obviously coddle and defer to the core, so if that's the case, sit them down and explain what the plan is. Status quo shouldn't be good for the core, either, should it?
Absolutely agree. Based on performance, Hextall and Burke may as well still be in charge.FLPensFan wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:51 amI consistently said Hornqvist and Kunitz types is a big missing element from this team.
Looking at it last night, the other big missing element is a shutdown defensive pairing.
There's no Orpik-Scuderi. There's no Hainsey and Ian Cole. There's no pre-injury Olli Maatta.
I look at this team right now, and I see FIVE players playing at or above expectations: Crosby, Guentzel, Eller, Pettersson and Nedeljkovic. The rest are all under-performing from my view.
My trade block right now is Guentzel, Smith, Rakell, Rust, any of the bottom 6 minus Eller, Graves, POJ. Could do some hockey trades to send that message.pens_CT wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:28 amI mean if you want to fire the coach, I have no issues with that. However the question remains, how much good will it do? The players from 87 on down want to play like its 2015. If you bring someone in that tries to implement a more defensive system, they will revolt like they did under Therrien and Johnston. I think you need to move some people by trades in order to get their attention. That's Guentzel and Rakell since their contracts allow them to be moved to most teams.KG wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:13 amhttps://pittsburghhockeynow.com/pittsbu ... is-letang/#
Why does the Pittsburgh media never mention maybe firing the coach is the short-term solution to help save the season? Think it worked pretty well for Edmonton!
Its a perimeter team, that believes style points matter in how you score a goal. They don't have players willing to go to the net for the ugly goals. Their defensive coverage is bad, and the PP is off the charts horrible. But sure change the coach if you want to, the results are going to be more of the same. You can't compare this situation to Edmonton, whose best players are still under 30.
I think straight up hockey trades or dealing players like Acciari, POJ for picks is most likely. Smith and/or Rakell for hockey "change of scenery" type trades are the biggest splashes we'll see. If Karlsson is dealt, it probably happens in the offseason.Pitts wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 12:10 pmMy trade block right now is Guentzel, Smith, Rakell, Rust, any of the bottom 6 minus Eller, Graves, POJ. Could do some hockey trades to send that message.pens_CT wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:28 amI mean if you want to fire the coach, I have no issues with that. However the question remains, how much good will it do? The players from 87 on down want to play like its 2015. If you bring someone in that tries to implement a more defensive system, they will revolt like they did under Therrien and Johnston. I think you need to move some people by trades in order to get their attention. That's Guentzel and Rakell since their contracts allow them to be moved to most teams.KG wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:13 amhttps://pittsburghhockeynow.com/pittsbu ... is-letang/#
Why does the Pittsburgh media never mention maybe firing the coach is the short-term solution to help save the season? Think it worked pretty well for Edmonton!
Its a perimeter team, that believes style points matter in how you score a goal. They don't have players willing to go to the net for the ugly goals. Their defensive coverage is bad, and the PP is off the charts horrible. But sure change the coach if you want to, the results are going to be more of the same. You can't compare this situation to Edmonton, whose best players are still under 30.
The boldest message would be to move one of Guentzel or Rust.
I do not think they will move any of Crosby, Malkin or Letang.
I think if Karlsson continues to struggle, he may ask to be moved.
I think because it was the Smythe Final makes it worse. Letang's was bad but really seems like the system is to go 5 steps forward, pass back, 10 steps forward, pass back, wash rinse repeat then pass it around the perimeter until it goes the other way. So Letang was just doing what is habitual.BigMcK wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 2:10 pmGoing to leave this here. On the AZ broadcast, one of the announcers labeled Letang passing backwards to Malkin was worse than this goal blunder:
Habitual? Or what he has been coached to do?Daniel wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 2:30 pmI think because it was the Smythe Final makes it worse. Letang's was bad but really seems like the system is to go 5 steps forward, pass back, 10 steps forward, pass back, wash rinse repeat then pass it around the perimeter until it goes the other way. So Letang was just doing what is habitual.BigMcK wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 2:10 pmGoing to leave this here. On the AZ broadcast, one of the announcers labeled Letang passing backwards to Malkin was worse than this goal blunder:
I think both. The plan for years has that stupid backward pass to try to build speed, which is fine when the team actually has a lot of speed.BurghThing wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 3:03 pmHabitual? Or what he has been coached to do?Daniel wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 2:30 pmI think because it was the Smythe Final makes it worse. Letang's was bad but really seems like the system is to go 5 steps forward, pass back, 10 steps forward, pass back, wash rinse repeat then pass it around the perimeter until it goes the other way. So Letang was just doing what is habitual.BigMcK wrote: Tue Jan 23, 2024 2:10 pmGoing to leave this here. On the AZ broadcast, one of the announcers labeled Letang passing backwards to Malkin was worse than this goal blunder: