Then feel free to point out these negative aspects because I don't recall you doing so. We may or may not agree on them.Eismann wrote:Several posters believe the effects of pot are much less bad than alcohol, and I would tend to agree. But in their effort to make that case, some would not acknowledge any negative aspects of pot at all. That's where my snarking comes in.
Drug Legalization; your view?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,902
- Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:14 am
- Location: Hi.
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
The negative aspects of pot? Come on, Willie.Willie Kool wrote:Then feel free to point out these negative aspects because I don't recall you doing so.Eismann wrote:Several posters believe the effects of pot are much less bad than alcohol, and I would tend to agree. But in their effort to make that case, some would not acknowledge any negative aspects of pot at all. That's where my snarking comes in.
Plus, if I do, the response is going to be a comparison to other drugs/alcohol, arguing that pot is way less problematic. Been there, not interested in retreading.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Wait...why do we need to point out the negatives when comparing it to alcohol? I don't understand. Do we have 8 year olds looking at this thread for research? Because I don't know any other demographic who doesn't already know such things.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Id love to see the list of all the things that would be illegal in eismann's utopia. And if trampolines aren't on there, I call shenanigans. Those things cause way more harm than good.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9,124
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:25 pm
- Location: Gleefully Ignorant
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Based on his comments, I would think Eismann would be all for making alcohol illegal again. Oh wait, he uses alcohol so that would be problematic.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 6,511
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: In the Ballrooms of Mars
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
So if people largely replaced their alcohol use with cannabis, we agree that there would likely be much less problems associated with said use? This is all I am arguing, that the net effects for society will be positive - not that there are absolutely no bad effects from cannabis use.Eismann wrote:To reiterate, I think the bad things that happen due to or related to alcohol are bad and want there to be less of them, and that also goes for all bad things that people use/do. Several posters believe the effects of pot are much less bad than alcohol, and I would tend to agree.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 27,917
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 3:28 pm
- Location: Fredneck
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
I think porn is bad for people but I don't think it should be illegal.Eismann wrote:Yeah, the quick recap is that i'm against full-on, no-limit legalization of pot use because I view it as another thing that's not good for people so removing a stigmatism against it is bad. I'm for using it for true medical purposes - not run of the mill stoners looking for a fix.count2infinity wrote:in case you're not aware of eismann's position on drugs, he's being extremely facetious.Gaucho wrote:Said who?Eismann wrote:
There are no problems with drugs.
The crux of the friction with many other posters comes from the initial comparison between pot and alcohol. To reiterate, I think the bad things that happen due to or related to alcohol are bad and want there to be less of them, and that also goes for all bad things that people use/do. Several posters believe the effects of pot are much less bad than alcohol, and I would tend to agree. But in their effort to make that case, some would not acknowledge any negative aspects of pot at all. That's where my snarking comes in.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
I think porn alleviates a lot of potential problems, many of which are violent.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
I'm actually enjoy it when he starts doing that. It's pretty funny.PensFanInDC wrote:Eismann, I totally respect your view and I even agree with most of it but what's with the incoherent rambling? Its not getting a point across.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Are you kidding me. It's sex. We need sex like we need, well, food, I would say. Try not having sex for a week. I can't concentrate on anything. Even your precious priests can't help themselves. If some porn can spice up your sex life, help you out in that sense, and I think most people could use some of that, go watch some. There is an absolute reason for the stuff, just like with anything, you don't want to get to addicted to it.PensFanInDC wrote:I think porn is bad for people but I don't think it should be illegal.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Didn't you say you only tried it a couple times? And from what I remember, you didn't even list the usual effects of it. I wouldn't tell you to go try it again if you're not interested, but I do think you have pot wrong.Eismann wrote:The negative aspects of pot? Come on, Willie.Willie Kool wrote:Then feel free to point out these negative aspects because I don't recall you doing so.Eismann wrote:Several posters believe the effects of pot are much less bad than alcohol, and I would tend to agree. But in their effort to make that case, some would not acknowledge any negative aspects of pot at all. That's where my snarking comes in.
Plus, if I do, the response is going to be a comparison to other drugs/alcohol, arguing that pot is way less problematic. Been there, not interested in retreading.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 14,082
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 2:33 pm
- Location: White-Juday Warp Field Interferometer
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Where are you coming up with that? I don't know of a single poster who has said there are no negative aspects at all. In fact, the negative aspects are why I've never done it myself. I think the bulk of the arguments are that the negatives are no worse than alcohol, or even that the negatives might not be as bad as alcohol. But that's a far cry from saying they are absent altogether.Eismann wrote:Several posters believe the effects of pot are much less bad than alcohol, and I would tend to agree. But in their effort to make that case, some would not acknowledge any negative aspects of pot at all. That's where my snarking comes in.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
tif, I honestly don't see any negatives of casual use.
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 44,375
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Ignoranti
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Indifference, but who cares.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Any impairment to your cognitive abilities can be reasonably labeled a negative.Sarcastic wrote:tif, I honestly don't see any negatives of casual use.
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 12,633
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:07 pm
- Location: "Enough is enough!" - Mike Sullivan
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Drug dealing is the most exploitative, destructive pyramid scheme in history.Gaucho wrote:Getting rid of dealers giving away free samples to hook teenagers can't be a bad thing.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,223
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:51 pm
- Location: Ponakronkoski
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Yes, but then why is alcohol illegal? It's amazing to me that some people will sit down over a beer and say pot should be illegal.shmenguin wrote:Any impairment to your cognitive abilities can be reasonably labeled a negative.Sarcastic wrote:tif, I honestly don't see any negatives of casual use.
I'm not singling either of you out, btw. Just pointing out how stupid some people's arguments are in the general public.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,223
- Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 10:51 pm
- Location: Ponakronkoski
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
[youtube][/youtube]
by the way, Nancy Grace is insane
by the way, Nancy Grace is insane
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
i was just responding to sarcastic -i think it should be legal, and alcohol has a worse net effect.pensfan1989 wrote:Yes, but then why is alcohol illegal? It's amazing to me that some people will sit down over a beer and say pot should be illegal.shmenguin wrote:Any impairment to your cognitive abilities can be reasonably labeled a negative.Sarcastic wrote:tif, I honestly don't see any negatives of casual use.
I'm not singling either of you out, btw. Just pointing out how stupid some people's arguments are in the general public.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
If you put it that way. But it's no different than beer then.shmenguin wrote:Any impairment to your cognitive abilities can be reasonably labeled a negative.Sarcastic wrote:tif, I honestly don't see any negatives of casual use.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Reason enough to stop this madness. So much money wasted, so many people in prison, so much crime allowed to blossom. Clearly, those who want it, will find it.Lt. Dish wrote:Drug dealing is the most exploitative, destructive pyramid scheme in history.Gaucho wrote:Getting rid of dealers giving away free samples to hook teenagers can't be a bad thing.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,041
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 10:34 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
Yeah, and as someone with OCD, I don't see it as a negative on a personal level. But I can't drive a car or do my job, so that's not great I guess.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
I don't think pot is suitable for everyday use. I know people who smoke too much. Not good.shmenguin wrote:Yeah, and as someone with OCD, I don't see it as a negative on a personal level. But I can't drive a car or do my job, so that's not great I guess.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,043
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:03 pm
- Location: Good night, sweet prince...
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
You should be careful with the word "we". We don't need sex like we need food, that's just ridiculous. PFiDC is not even Catholic, so I don't know why you're saying "youre precious priests". You don't need porn to "spice up your sex life"... use your own imagination. There is so much just wrong with this post, I'm not even sure you're serious (but knowing you... you are).Sarcastic wrote:Are you kidding me. It's sex. We need sex like we need, well, food, I would say. Try not having sex for a week. I can't concentrate on anything. Even your precious priests can't help themselves. If some porn can spice up your sex life, help you out in that sense, and I think most people could use some of that, go watch some. There is an absolute reason for the stuff, just like with anything, you don't want to get to addicted to it.PensFanInDC wrote:I think porn is bad for people but I don't think it should be illegal.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,340
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:49 pm
Re: Drug Legalization; your view?
I use the word 'we' and I will continue to use the word 'we', unless maybe you're physically broken and are no longer interested in the opposite sex. This is nature, this is your DNA, and nobody here is going to tell me they never enjoyed a dirty movie, even if they're too chicken to admit it. We need a sexual outlet as we need food, for both physical and psychological reasons.count2infinity wrote:You should be careful with the word "we". We don't need sex like we need food, that's just ridiculous. PFiDC is not even Catholic, so I don't know why you're saying "youre precious priests". You don't need porn to "spice up your sex life"... use your own imagination. There is so much just wrong with this post, I'm not even sure you're serious (but knowing you... you are).Sarcastic wrote:Are you kidding me. It's sex. We need sex like we need, well, food, I would say. Try not having sex for a week. I can't concentrate on anything. Even your precious priests can't help themselves. If some porn can spice up your sex life, help you out in that sense, and I think most people could use some of that, go watch some. There is an absolute reason for the stuff, just like with anything, you don't want to get to addicted to it.PensFanInDC wrote:I think porn is bad for people but I don't think it should be illegal.