NFL
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,391
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:55 am
- Location: New Kensington, PA
Re: NFL
Yep.ville5 wrote:Mike Wallace and a 7th to Minnesota for a 5th.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12477 ... i-dolphins" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 10,358
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 1:17 pm
- Location: getting body slammed by kelly kelly
Re: NFL
It's no surprise that Wallace ended up in Minnesota. After he signed a five-year, $60 million deal with the Dolphins two years ago Wallace's father disclosed that the Vikingsoffered more money.
"The (Vikings) had come to the point where they were telling him, 'You don't have to live here, just be here during the season,' " Wallace's father explained at the time. "He wanted to get out of that snow and cold weather."
Thats off nfl.com
"The (Vikings) had come to the point where they were telling him, 'You don't have to live here, just be here during the season,' " Wallace's father explained at the time. "He wanted to get out of that snow and cold weather."
Thats off nfl.com
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,391
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:55 am
- Location: New Kensington, PA
Re: NFL
He will be in a rotation with Hyde and Hunter. He's not gonna be asked to be the feature back. He will be used for catching balls out of the backfield and screens etc more than anything else.Dickie Dunn wrote:4 years, 16 million, 4 million guaranteed. It's like the 49ers are actively trying to suck.canaan wrote:Reggie Bush to the Niners
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,107
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:40 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA - @MichaelFarkasHF
Re: NFL
He'd be much more effective, I think, in a role where he doesn't have to carry the mail between the tackles a bunch of times. Use him like Darren Sproles, I think that's best for him...not a big fan of him as a feature back...then again, that workhorse back role seems to be dying anyhow...what are there, like 8, 10, 12 teams (?) that use a single back for the majority of their carries...?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,391
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:55 am
- Location: New Kensington, PA
Re: NFL
Again, Bush is not going to be the feature back. He will be used as a change of pace guy and to catch balls out of the backfield etc. He will be just fine in that role. Hyde is gonna get the chance to get the majority of the carries at first, but it will still be RBBC of sorts at least to start.mikey287 wrote:He'd be much more effective, I think, in a role where he doesn't have to carry the mail between the tackles a bunch of times. Use him like Darren Sproles, I think that's best for him...not a big fan of him as a feature back...then again, that workhorse back role seems to be dying anyhow...what are there, like 8, 10, 12 teams (?) that use a single back for the majority of their carries...?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,237
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:05 am
Re: NFL
Bush WAS good for a few years. Wheels pretty much fell off last year. Injury issues, old and losing his explosiveness, drops a lot of passes, long history of fumbling, and is bad at picking up his blocking assignment. He'll have a role in San Francisco for a year, maybe two, but based on the RB signings this offseason, $4 million/season plus $4 million guaranteed is too much money for a rotation RB who might not even be good at his role anymore.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,107
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:40 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA - @MichaelFarkasHF
Re: NFL
Right, I know this. I'm agreeing with you.skullman80 wrote:Again, Bush is not going to be the feature back. He will be used as a change of pace guy and to catch balls out of the backfield etc. He will be just fine in that role. Hyde is gonna get the chance to get the majority of the carries at first, but it will still be RBBC of sorts at least to start.mikey287 wrote:He'd be much more effective, I think, in a role where he doesn't have to carry the mail between the tackles a bunch of times. Use him like Darren Sproles, I think that's best for him...not a big fan of him as a feature back...then again, that workhorse back role seems to be dying anyhow...what are there, like 8, 10, 12 teams (?) that use a single back for the majority of their carries...?
-
- NHL Second Liner
- Posts: 55,335
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 1:42 pm
- Location: I'm sorry you feel that way
Re: NFL
Based on the rb signings, that contract is at worst on par and basically just a value contract. Banks have been broken and gms have been morons. Well one gm in particular.Dickie Dunn wrote:Bush WAS good for a few years. Wheels pretty much fell off last year. Injury issues, old and losing his explosiveness, drops a lot of passes, long history of fumbling, and is bad at picking up his blocking assignment. He'll have a role in San Francisco for a year, maybe two, but based on the RB signings this offseason, $4 million/season plus $4 million guaranteed is too much money for a rotation RB who might not even be good at his role anymore.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,391
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:55 am
- Location: New Kensington, PA
Re: NFL
He's only going to be needed for a year or two. I honestly haven't looked at the structure of the contract, but I would bet years 3 and 4 are easily voidable to not cost the 49ers alot of dead cap space if they want to cut him after they feel they have got their use.Dickie Dunn wrote:Bush WAS good for a few years. Wheels pretty much fell off last year. Injury issues, old and losing his explosiveness, drops a lot of passes, long history of fumbling, and is bad at picking up his blocking assignment. He'll have a role in San Francisco for a year, maybe two, but based on the RB signings this offseason, $4 million/season plus $4 million guaranteed is too much money for a rotation RB who might not even be good at his role anymore.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,391
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 11:55 am
- Location: New Kensington, PA
Re: NFL
Sorry it's early.mikey287 wrote:Right, I know this. I'm agreeing with you.skullman80 wrote:Again, Bush is not going to be the feature back. He will be used as a change of pace guy and to catch balls out of the backfield etc. He will be just fine in that role. Hyde is gonna get the chance to get the majority of the carries at first, but it will still be RBBC of sorts at least to start.mikey287 wrote:He'd be much more effective, I think, in a role where he doesn't have to carry the mail between the tackles a bunch of times. Use him like Darren Sproles, I think that's best for him...not a big fan of him as a feature back...then again, that workhorse back role seems to be dying anyhow...what are there, like 8, 10, 12 teams (?) that use a single back for the majority of their carries...?
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 21,107
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:40 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA - @MichaelFarkasHF
Re: NFL
No sweat, I wasn't entirely clear in my thoughts myself...skullman80 wrote:Sorry it's early.mikey287 wrote:Right, I know this. I'm agreeing with you.skullman80 wrote:Again, Bush is not going to be the feature back. He will be used as a change of pace guy and to catch balls out of the backfield etc. He will be just fine in that role. Hyde is gonna get the chance to get the majority of the carries at first, but it will still be RBBC of sorts at least to start.mikey287 wrote:He'd be much more effective, I think, in a role where he doesn't have to carry the mail between the tackles a bunch of times. Use him like Darren Sproles, I think that's best for him...not a big fan of him as a feature back...then again, that workhorse back role seems to be dying anyhow...what are there, like 8, 10, 12 teams (?) that use a single back for the majority of their carries...?
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 7,237
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 10:05 am
Re: NFL
If he can return to form for that year or two, he could be a useful part of a RBBC. I'm just not sold that he can return to form.skullman80 wrote:He's only going to be needed for a year or two. I honestly haven't looked at the structure of the contract, but I would bet years 3 and 4 are easily voidable to not cost the 49ers alot of dead cap space if they want to cut him after they feel they have got their use.Dickie Dunn wrote:Bush WAS good for a few years. Wheels pretty much fell off last year. Injury issues, old and losing his explosiveness, drops a lot of passes, long history of fumbling, and is bad at picking up his blocking assignment. He'll have a role in San Francisco for a year, maybe two, but based on the RB signings this offseason, $4 million/season plus $4 million guaranteed is too much money for a rotation RB who might not even be good at his role anymore.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 20,279
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:08 am
- Location: its like bologna with olives in it
Re: NFL
http://deadspin.com/report-the-philadel ... 1691731806" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Chip...what is happening Chip...have you been drinking
Chip...what is happening Chip...have you been drinking
-
- NHL Healthy Scratch
- Posts: 11,244
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:12 am
- Location: formerly Pittsburgh, now NJ
Re: NFL
Now I know he's trolling the city of Brotherly Love.slappybrown wrote:http://deadspin.com/report-the-philadel ... 1691731806
Chip...what is happening Chip...have you been drinking