if McGroarty can be Rust, Hornqvist, Tocchet, I'd definitely say he is an A prospect. If you think about it, Crosby was never a prospect once he got drafted.FLPensFan wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 10:49 pmI think McGroarty's top end is a Bryan Rust/Hornqvist type of guy. Ceiling for me is a 25 goal, 50 point player. But he reminds me more of Rick Tocchet...a lot of garbage type goals from just being around the net, but that isn't the only way he'll score. I would agree he is our best prospect...high B or low A level type.Daniel wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 9:58 pmMurasov and Blomqvist and McGroarty are as close as they've got for A level guys. Not sure you'd want to build around a goalie though.FLPensFan wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 8:01 pmIf you are talking about building around someone, I'd take Cozens almost every time, simply because he is 2 years younger.EndO FanEra wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 7:52 pmI'm down for either of those guys as an option.dark_forces wrote: Fri Jan 24, 2025 5:40 pm
I agree 100%. If we can get someone like Dylan Cozens for less, and is more in line with the other young players we have, why overpay and give up all those assets for E. Pettersson?
I don't know how accurate either of our proposals are for E. Pettersson and Cozens, but they're not all that far apart value wise.
To Van: M. Pettersson, Rakell (with $1M-$2M retained), 2nd, picks/prospects to even things out
To Pit: E. Petterson, picks/prospects to even things out
To Buf: Rickard Rakell, Noel Acciari (cap purposes), Anthony Beauvillier (cap purposes), Ville Koivunen, 2026 2nd (STL)
To Pit: Dylan Cozens and Jason Zucker (50% retained)
Both have Rakell & a 2nd going out. Difference is Rakell's retention and Pettersson vs Acciari, Beauvillier, & Koivunen. I would say that Pettersson and retention is the higher value than those 3, but I do think that Beau and Koivunen have some/decent value.
Coming back with Cozens is Zucker. To me, Zucker may have value to a playoff team, but not with the Pens. Forget the cap hit and his age, it's just adding another vet to block an opportunity for the youth. So, if we're taking Zucker back, to me, it's because we have to, not because we want to. I don't know it if evens out the difference in Petterson going out, but those two packages aren't all that far apart in my eyes.
Now, Cozens is 3 years younger and $4.5M cheaper, so there is definitely value in that. I haven't seen enough of either of them to know how they stack up taking things like salary, age, team, etc. into consideration.
So, is the difference in performance between Cozens & Pettersson equivalent to the difference in age/salary? Your guess is probably better than mine.
I just hope that Dubas is looking into some impact players like that, that can help take some of the pressure off of Sid & Geno going forward. I'm down for some more Tomasino & Lizotte types, but I think we need at least one guy that moves the needle on a regular basis.
I also would not get too attached to any prospect we have in our system, and potentially any prospect we draft in the next 2 years. The chances of the team drafting the right pieces and putting everything together on the first try are pretty low. Some of these guys, if we were to go out and get them, really wouldn't be for building around, but rather, to acquire the pieces to build around.
I don't think there is a single player in our system right now that we absolutely must keep and build around. Quite frankly, I don't think we have an A-level guy in our system. We have some solid B-level guys, but, there are no forwards that are essentially top 6 forwards. There are no d-men in our system that are guaranteed top pairing guys.
So, we can try for a quick rebuild on the fly, but some of that may be acquiring young guys with good upside and potential, and eventually flipping them for high picks or other players young players a few years down the road.
Need to see more from Murashov and Blomqvist. They are good and have some promise, but also both have some holes to their game that they will need to improve upon.
I'd throw Brunicke in that mix as well. I've seen a few reports that, based on what he did this summer and the start he got in Juniors, he likely should have been a late 1st round pick.

You get better than the comparisons you gave and you get guys that go straight to the NHL, for the most part. When Crosby got drafted, the team had Malkin and Orpik and Fleury and little else. I think it's easier to rebuild now because of free agency and technology to help with diamonds in the rough prospects. I doubt the Penguins will get a top 5 pick this year, but when they do they might have a much better group of prospects than when Crosby got drafted. We'll see though.
Of course, they need to replace Sullivan, but at this point that might be the signature at the end of any post on this message board.