The Jarry Problem
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,341
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:05 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
Colorado but I don’t see a trade that would work. They have 6 mil in space now but only due to injuries.
But at 50% retention anything is possible.
But at 50% retention anything is possible.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 23,913
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
That summer:Pitts wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:52 pmI read again just this week that the goalie market was terrible that off season and they "had no choice."Antonio wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 2:30 pmSo my question is...why could tons of casual fans see signing him to that contract was a non starter before it was signed but the million dollar "experts" running the show could not avoid that mistake?![]()
--Cam Talbot signed a 1 year, 1M AAV contract
--Anthony Stolarz signed a 1 year, 1.1M AAV contract
--Ilya Samsonov, 1.8M 1 year contract
That's really all the potential options that were out there.
If you look at all the other players that signed (Andersen, Raanta, Quick, Korpisalo, Brossoit, Varlamov, Swayman, etc), almost all of these guys were re-signing with their previous teams. So, there really wasn't a great option there. I would have taken Talbot on that 1 year deal to go along with Ned. Then Dubas would have learned that Blomqvist was ready, and had Ned and Blomqvist this season.
So, the options were super limited....but throwing a 5 year deal with a bloated salary at Jarry wasn't the solution either. Should have stuck with a 1-2 year term, even if they had to go to 6M....or found a goalie deal via trade.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,449
- Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:17 am
- Location: Cranberry Township, PA
Re: The Jarry Problem
maopens wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 pmThe best option may be putting Jarry on LTIR so we can have some cap relief.
Surely, he can be diagnosed as having torn his motivator cuff, or a sprained heartilage.

Died of broken heart.

I agree. He needs to go to WBS. I don’t think he will get better. The team needs to lose his contract, one way or another.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 23,913
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
Hire a PI and find some dirt on him that is grounds for contract termination.IntangibleBeer wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 10:01 pmmaopens wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 pmThe best option may be putting Jarry on LTIR so we can have some cap relief.
Surely, he can be diagnosed as having torn his motivator cuff, or a sprained heartilage.![]()
Died of broken heart.![]()
I agree. He needs to go to WBS. I don’t think he will get better. The team needs to lose his contract, one way or another.

-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,279
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:23 pm
- Location: Drawing 1 line in the sand, followed by another, and another, and another. TIC TAC TOE
Re: The Jarry Problem
Would a case of 'impersonating a goalie' suffice?FLPensFan wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 10:33 pmHire a PI and find some dirt on him that is grounds for contract termination.IntangibleBeer wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 10:01 pmmaopens wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 pmThe best option may be putting Jarry on LTIR so we can have some cap relief.
Surely, he can be diagnosed as having torn his motivator cuff, or a sprained heartilage.![]()
Died of broken heart.![]()
I agree. He needs to go to WBS. I don’t think he will get better. The team needs to lose his contract, one way or another.![]()

-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7,525
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
- Location: Fire Sullivan.
Re: The Jarry Problem
Here was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,279
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:23 pm
- Location: Drawing 1 line in the sand, followed by another, and another, and another. TIC TAC TOE
Re: The Jarry Problem
While I would agree, this scenario doesn't take into account that the face of the franchise had a contract to negotiate that needed to show some sort of stability to the roster that the rebuild process wasn't going to be a total teardown and rebuild where the team (player) had zero chance of getting into the playoffs before retirement.Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 amHere was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
Sell the above to Crosby and you would do well selling used cars or timeshares.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,416
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:02 pm
- Location: Fire Sullivan
Re: The Jarry Problem
Maybe we solve Jarry problem somehow,but Graves problem will still be here.. I hope we can resolve it asap..
Maybe Jarry needs just change of scenery..he is in best goalies years, 28-33..
Maybe Jarry needs just change of scenery..he is in best goalies years, 28-33..
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7,525
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
- Location: Fire Sullivan.
Re: The Jarry Problem
I don't know Sid personally, so I couldn't tell you how this would go. The pitch has to start with Crosby knowing Dubas has a (tough) job to do, I think that was a given this offseason, but perhaps not as much the year before.BigMcK wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 3:49 amWhile I would agree, this scenario doesn't take into account that the face of the franchise had a contract to negotiate that needed to show some sort of stability to the roster that the rebuild process wasn't going to be a total teardown and rebuild where the team (player) had zero chance of getting into the playoffs before retirement.Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 amHere was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
Sell the above to Crosby and you would do well selling used cars or timeshares.
You tell Sid, look we're not happy with goaltending from last season; Jarry will want a raise and it doesn't make sense. We got some young guys coming up, might not be ready this year but they will be getting there. In the meantime we will pick up a few goalies on the cheap on short term deals and make some room for.. oh I don't know.. an upgrade over <name scrub in the bottom 6> on a short term deal.
Then you start by offering Jarry his current (now previous AAV) for another 2 years. And slightly less AAV if he wants more term on the deal. Take it or leave it. Jarry moves on, signs with the Oilers or whatever, craps the bed and disappears from hockey.
I think Sid will frown and maybe not understand, but he might go along with it. I dunno, I'm not a GM and not suited to be one, but signing Jarry for 5M+ for 5 years is a howler.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 23,913
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
Too much hindsight in all of this.Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 amHere was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.
Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,788
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 8:19 am
- Location: SF, California
Re: The Jarry Problem
The Jarry problem is the same as the Sully problem……..Problem is,they are both employed by the Pittsburgh Penguins!!!!!
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 23,913
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
More publicly flattery for Jarry:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/585115 ... y-options/
https://pittsburghhockeynow.com/pittsbu ... st-shines/
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/585115 ... y-options/
https://pittsburghhockeynow.com/pittsbu ... st-shines/
-
- AHL'er
- Posts: 3,051
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:56 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
Yeah, I do think re-signing Jarry was the best option when it happened. Remember that they were also determined to add Karlsson that summer too, and they weren't going to go into that season with a Nedjelkovic/completely untested Blomqvist tandem. They were taking a big swing at making a playoff run.FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 amToo much hindsight in all of this.Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 amHere was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.
Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
That said, I would have offered Jarry either a substantial raise or term, not both. If he had gotten a 2-year deal at $5-6 million, it wouldn't be as big a deal this season. They could have bought him out over the summer, might be able trade him with some retention, or just wait it out and let him walk next summer. Or if he had kept the same salary (I think it was $3.25 million) and had a 5-year deal, things wouldn't be great, but it'd still be easier to find a taker in a trade at that price, again with some possible retention.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,516
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 9:41 am
Re: The Jarry Problem
1 more retained salary spot left....who wants it?Pens4Life wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:02 pmNone of the scenarios with him are good.. but sometimes you have to take some bad with the good..
Maybe Jarry with 25% retained (4M approx. left) and 2nd rounder goes for another underperforming guy and 3rd rounder..
Which team could need him? Even JR and Vancouver probably wouldnt bite that sour apple atm.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,951
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:53 am
- Location: NY
Re: The Jarry Problem
Blom first goalie off today. Good. Jarry really shouldn't be getting any starts at home until he gets his head right.
-
- NHL Fourth Liner
- Posts: 16,876
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
- Location: Sitting in front of my computer
Re: The Jarry Problem
The only other option, I saw, was to eschew the position at the start of the season and hope to use that cap space to make a trade mid-season.FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 amToo much hindsight in all of this.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.
Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
I don''t know if that was a realistic thought, though frankly there was enough evidence and talk about Jarry's play for it to be a consideration.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:31 pm
Re: The Jarry Problem
I don't think he should getting anymore starts in a Penguins uniform. Period. Ride Blomqvist for as long as you need until Ned is back (who is already on a conditioning assignment in WBS for 3 games). And then ride Blom/Ned the rest of the way while you figure out how to get rid of #35. He's an absolute headcase and spins off nothing more than loser energy everytime he opens his mouth.KG wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:38 amBlom first goalie off today. Good. Jarry really shouldn't be getting any starts at home until he gets his head right.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8,691
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:10 pm
- Location: Dallas
Re: The Jarry Problem
I think the contract was because of the delusion that this is a contending team and Jarry was the best of many bad options. They couldn’t just go into last season with 2 journeymen and hope one of the kids develops. Murashov had a nice WBS debut and Blomqvist was great last year. Problem is, both were unknown before last season.FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 amToo much hindsight in all of this.Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 amHere was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.
Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
A realistic look at the roster and no way they sign Jarry. Get Ned and who cares and hope for the future, but the Penguins will be in win now mode until the wheels fall off.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 1,345
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 11:48 am
Re: The Jarry Problem
I lean toward this direction as well. However, from management's perspective, barring a surprise trade, you're left to at least attempt to get him back on track. Maybe you bring in a sports psychologist to work with him and get him focused and reengaged.Coffey Break wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:43 amI don't think he should getting anymore starts in a Penguins uniform. Period. Ride Blomqvist for as long as you need until Ned is back (who is already on a conditioning assignment in WBS for 3 games). And then ride Blom/Ned the rest of the way while you figure out how to get rid of #35. He's an absolute headcase and spins off nothing more than loser energy everytime he opens his mouth.KG wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:38 amBlom first goalie off today. Good. Jarry really shouldn't be getting any starts at home until he gets his head right.
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7,525
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
- Location: Fire Sullivan.
Re: The Jarry Problem
Hindsight, yeah. For Blomqvist (a bit), Murashov (yeah), Larsson (eh, sure), Gauthier (yeah).largegarlic wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:17 amYeah, I do think re-signing Jarry was the best option when it happened. Remember that they were also determined to add Karlsson that summer too, and they weren't going to go into that season with a Nedjelkovic/completely untested Blomqvist tandem. They were taking a big swing at making a playoff run.FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 amToo much hindsight in all of this.Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 amHere was the real option last summer.
Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.
Done.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.
Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
That said, I would have offered Jarry either a substantial raise or term, not both. If he had gotten a 2-year deal at $5-6 million, it wouldn't be as big a deal this season. They could have bought him out over the summer, might be able trade him with some retention, or just wait it out and let him walk next summer. Or if he had kept the same salary (I think it was $3.25 million) and had a 5-year deal, things wouldn't be great, but it'd still be easier to find a taker in a trade at that price, again with some possible retention.
Not for Jarry. I called it at the time. Did not want him on the roster. At 1M, maybe. At a real stretch, at the same AAV for a short term deal. That part isn't hindsight.
This team could have gone out and money-balled a few goaltenders. There are enough budget bin goaltenders around usually to take a chance on. Larsson was an example this off-season, but they're always kinda there. You could get a few on the cheap and let them compete for back up duty. Blomqvist can be in the conversation if he does well in the A.
Jarry at 5.375Mx5 was awful at the time and it's not gotten any better. I actually like Graves' contract better by a fair amount.
The problem with Jarry is that you're getting a high ceiling, no floor kind of goalie. That's nice, but wouldn't outperform someone like Ned by any significant margin on average and fall significantly below that for stretches. You might as well have the cap space assigned somewhere else at that stage.
-
- ECHL'er
- Posts: 2,169
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:03 am
Re: The Jarry Problem
I think this is a good approach. Jarry is broken mentally. Unfortunately, I don’t think it matters who’s in net as long as Sully and his outdated system are still behind the bench.Pens4Life wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:02 pmNone of the scenarios with him are good.. but sometimes you have to take some bad with the good..
Maybe Jarry with 25% retained (4M approx. left) and 2nd rounder goes for another underperforming guy and 3rd rounder..
Which team could need him? Even JR and Vancouver probably wouldnt bite that sour apple atm.
-
- AHL All-Star
- Posts: 5,416
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:02 pm
- Location: Fire Sullivan
Re: The Jarry Problem
Defense is huge problem with Pens, soo many mistakes, bad passes, bad coverages, bad positioning.. it seems even worse now with Quinn here! They look confused and lost.. every goalie will suffer with that 6-7 guys in front of him
-
- AHL Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7,525
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
- Location: Fire Sullivan.
Re: The Jarry Problem
I think that's what worried me the absolute most to start the season. Dubas did a ton of work to overhaul the bottom six and improved the goalie situation.Pens4Life wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 4:31 amDefense is huge problem with Pens, soo many mistakes, bad passes, bad coverages, bad positioning.. it seems even worse now with Quinn here! They look confused and lost.. every goalie will suffer with that 6-7 guys in front of him
Defense.. we signed Grzelcyk to play top pair minutes and... *crickets chirping*
I get it, defense doesn't put asses in seats, but we're really soft at back. I don't mean that in a physicality way. If the emphasis was to be to reach the playoffs, more than bringing in assets for the future, that should've been addressed. Even at the cost of passing up on one of these picking up some misfits with picks attached types of deals.
Whenever this team has to transition to defense, there's just that fraction of extra time lost. Combine it with some misreads and this defense gets beaten a lot.
-
- NHL Third Liner
- Posts: 25,951
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:53 am
- Location: NY
Re: The Jarry Problem
According to Freidman the Avs are looking at Gibson and Blackwood as potential goalie options. Hopefully KD is doing his due diligence.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 13,300
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:04 am
Re: The Jarry Problem
Ned recalled from WBS.