The Jarry Problem

Forum for Pittsburgh Penguins-related messages.
Maestro
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 5,341
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:05 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Maestro »

Colorado but I don’t see a trade that would work. They have 6 mil in space now but only due to injuries.

But at 50% retention anything is possible.
FLPensFan
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 23,913
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by FLPensFan »

Pitts wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 4:52 pm
Antonio wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 2:30 pm
So my question is...why could tons of casual fans see signing him to that contract was a non starter before it was signed but the million dollar "experts" running the show could not avoid that mistake?
I read again just this week that the goalie market was terrible that off season and they "had no choice." :roll:
That summer:

--Cam Talbot signed a 1 year, 1M AAV contract
--Anthony Stolarz signed a 1 year, 1.1M AAV contract
--Ilya Samsonov, 1.8M 1 year contract

That's really all the potential options that were out there.

If you look at all the other players that signed (Andersen, Raanta, Quick, Korpisalo, Brossoit, Varlamov, Swayman, etc), almost all of these guys were re-signing with their previous teams. So, there really wasn't a great option there. I would have taken Talbot on that 1 year deal to go along with Ned. Then Dubas would have learned that Blomqvist was ready, and had Ned and Blomqvist this season.

So, the options were super limited....but throwing a 5 year deal with a bloated salary at Jarry wasn't the solution either. Should have stuck with a 1-2 year term, even if they had to go to 6M....or found a goalie deal via trade.
IntangibleBeer
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 2,449
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:17 am
Location: Cranberry Township, PA

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by IntangibleBeer »

maopens wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 pm
The best option may be putting Jarry on LTIR so we can have some cap relief.

Surely, he can be diagnosed as having torn his motivator cuff, or a sprained heartilage.
:lol:

Died of broken heart. :!:

I agree. He needs to go to WBS. I don’t think he will get better. The team needs to lose his contract, one way or another.
FLPensFan
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 23,913
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by FLPensFan »

IntangibleBeer wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 10:01 pm
maopens wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 pm
The best option may be putting Jarry on LTIR so we can have some cap relief.

Surely, he can be diagnosed as having torn his motivator cuff, or a sprained heartilage.
:lol:

Died of broken heart. :!:

I agree. He needs to go to WBS. I don’t think he will get better. The team needs to lose his contract, one way or another.
Hire a PI and find some dirt on him that is grounds for contract termination. :wink:
BigMcK
AHL'er
AHL'er
Posts: 3,279
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:23 pm
Location: Drawing 1 line in the sand, followed by another, and another, and another. TIC TAC TOE

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by BigMcK »

FLPensFan wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 10:33 pm
IntangibleBeer wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 10:01 pm
maopens wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 1:11 pm
The best option may be putting Jarry on LTIR so we can have some cap relief.

Surely, he can be diagnosed as having torn his motivator cuff, or a sprained heartilage.
:lol:

Died of broken heart. :!:

I agree. He needs to go to WBS. I don’t think he will get better. The team needs to lose his contract, one way or another.
Hire a PI and find some dirt on him that is grounds for contract termination. :wink:
Would a case of 'impersonating a goalie' suffice? :fist:
Puck-Lurker
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 7,525
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
Location: Fire Sullivan.

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Puck-Lurker »

Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
BigMcK
AHL'er
AHL'er
Posts: 3,279
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:23 pm
Location: Drawing 1 line in the sand, followed by another, and another, and another. TIC TAC TOE

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by BigMcK »

Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 am
Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
While I would agree, this scenario doesn't take into account that the face of the franchise had a contract to negotiate that needed to show some sort of stability to the roster that the rebuild process wasn't going to be a total teardown and rebuild where the team (player) had zero chance of getting into the playoffs before retirement.

Sell the above to Crosby and you would do well selling used cars or timeshares.
Pens4Life
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 5,416
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Fire Sullivan

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Pens4Life »

Maybe we solve Jarry problem somehow,but Graves problem will still be here.. I hope we can resolve it asap..

Maybe Jarry needs just change of scenery..he is in best goalies years, 28-33..
Puck-Lurker
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 7,525
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
Location: Fire Sullivan.

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Puck-Lurker »

BigMcK wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 3:49 am
Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 am
Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
While I would agree, this scenario doesn't take into account that the face of the franchise had a contract to negotiate that needed to show some sort of stability to the roster that the rebuild process wasn't going to be a total teardown and rebuild where the team (player) had zero chance of getting into the playoffs before retirement.

Sell the above to Crosby and you would do well selling used cars or timeshares.
I don't know Sid personally, so I couldn't tell you how this would go. The pitch has to start with Crosby knowing Dubas has a (tough) job to do, I think that was a given this offseason, but perhaps not as much the year before.

You tell Sid, look we're not happy with goaltending from last season; Jarry will want a raise and it doesn't make sense. We got some young guys coming up, might not be ready this year but they will be getting there. In the meantime we will pick up a few goalies on the cheap on short term deals and make some room for.. oh I don't know.. an upgrade over <name scrub in the bottom 6> on a short term deal.

Then you start by offering Jarry his current (now previous AAV) for another 2 years. And slightly less AAV if he wants more term on the deal. Take it or leave it. Jarry moves on, signs with the Oilers or whatever, craps the bed and disappears from hockey.

I think Sid will frown and maybe not understand, but he might go along with it. I dunno, I'm not a GM and not suited to be one, but signing Jarry for 5M+ for 5 years is a howler.
FLPensFan
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 23,913
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by FLPensFan »

Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 am
Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
Too much hindsight in all of this.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.

Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
Dynasty1970
AHL'er
AHL'er
Posts: 3,788
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 8:19 am
Location: SF, California

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Dynasty1970 »

The Jarry problem is the same as the Sully problem……..Problem is,they are both employed by the Pittsburgh Penguins!!!!!
FLPensFan
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 23,913
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:30 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by FLPensFan »

largegarlic
AHL'er
AHL'er
Posts: 3,051
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:56 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by largegarlic »

FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 am
Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 am
Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
Too much hindsight in all of this.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.

Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
Yeah, I do think re-signing Jarry was the best option when it happened. Remember that they were also determined to add Karlsson that summer too, and they weren't going to go into that season with a Nedjelkovic/completely untested Blomqvist tandem. They were taking a big swing at making a playoff run.

That said, I would have offered Jarry either a substantial raise or term, not both. If he had gotten a 2-year deal at $5-6 million, it wouldn't be as big a deal this season. They could have bought him out over the summer, might be able trade him with some retention, or just wait it out and let him walk next summer. Or if he had kept the same salary (I think it was $3.25 million) and had a 5-year deal, things wouldn't be great, but it'd still be easier to find a taker in a trade at that price, again with some possible retention.
Cow_Master66
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 1,516
Joined: Fri May 19, 2017 9:41 am

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Cow_Master66 »

Pens4Life wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:02 pm
None of the scenarios with him are good.. but sometimes you have to take some bad with the good..

Maybe Jarry with 25% retained (4M approx. left) and 2nd rounder goes for another underperforming guy and 3rd rounder..

Which team could need him? Even JR and Vancouver probably wouldnt bite that sour apple atm.
1 more retained salary spot left....who wants it?
KG
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 25,951
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:53 am
Location: NY

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by KG »

Blom first goalie off today. Good. Jarry really shouldn't be getting any starts at home until he gets his head right.
pfim
NHL Fourth Liner
NHL Fourth Liner
Posts: 16,876
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 7:35 am
Location: Sitting in front of my computer

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by pfim »

FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 am
Too much hindsight in all of this.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.

Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
The only other option, I saw, was to eschew the position at the start of the season and hope to use that cap space to make a trade mid-season.

I don''t know if that was a realistic thought, though frankly there was enough evidence and talk about Jarry's play for it to be a consideration.
Coffey Break
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 3:31 pm

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Coffey Break »

KG wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:38 am
Blom first goalie off today. Good. Jarry really shouldn't be getting any starts at home until he gets his head right.
I don't think he should getting anymore starts in a Penguins uniform. Period. Ride Blomqvist for as long as you need until Ned is back (who is already on a conditioning assignment in WBS for 3 games). And then ride Blom/Ned the rest of the way while you figure out how to get rid of #35. He's an absolute headcase and spins off nothing more than loser energy everytime he opens his mouth.
Daniel
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 8,691
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 3:10 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Daniel »

FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 am
Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 am
Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
Too much hindsight in all of this.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.

Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
I think the contract was because of the delusion that this is a contending team and Jarry was the best of many bad options. They couldn’t just go into last season with 2 journeymen and hope one of the kids develops. Murashov had a nice WBS debut and Blomqvist was great last year. Problem is, both were unknown before last season.

A realistic look at the roster and no way they sign Jarry. Get Ned and who cares and hope for the future, but the Penguins will be in win now mode until the wheels fall off.
dark_forces
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 1,345
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 11:48 am

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by dark_forces »

Coffey Break wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:43 am
KG wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:38 am
Blom first goalie off today. Good. Jarry really shouldn't be getting any starts at home until he gets his head right.
I don't think he should getting anymore starts in a Penguins uniform. Period. Ride Blomqvist for as long as you need until Ned is back (who is already on a conditioning assignment in WBS for 3 games). And then ride Blom/Ned the rest of the way while you figure out how to get rid of #35. He's an absolute headcase and spins off nothing more than loser energy everytime he opens his mouth.
I lean toward this direction as well. However, from management's perspective, barring a surprise trade, you're left to at least attempt to get him back on track. Maybe you bring in a sports psychologist to work with him and get him focused and reengaged.
Puck-Lurker
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 7,525
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
Location: Fire Sullivan.

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Puck-Lurker »

largegarlic wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 11:17 am
FLPensFan wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 10:05 am
Puck-Lurker wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2024 2:41 am
Here was the real option last summer.

Sign Ned.
Promote Blomqvist.
Sign Larsson.
Invite Murashov to the US.
Gauthier.
Pick up some dude to play minor league hockey.

Done.
Too much hindsight in all of this.
--I don't think the Penguins have been happy with Jarry for awhile, but I do think the tipping point was last year, staring down the defense, and losing his job for the last 11 games. Without that happening, he may not be held in low regard by management.
--Blomqvist had 1 game in WBS going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Murashov was under contract in the MHL/KHL going into last season. He wasn't a realistic option.
--Gauthier was an average goalie, splitting time between ECHL and AHL. If anything, he was on a downward trajectory compared to when he first signed.
--Larsson likely wasn't on their radar at this point.

Dubas should have had some intelligence to say we have a few good young goalies in our system. There's a chance one of them breaks out sooner rather than later. He either signs Jarry to a 2 year deal, or lets him walk and gets a Talbot/Nedeljkovic tandem, and still gets someone like Hellberg to be the AHL vet emergency break glass goalie.
Yeah, I do think re-signing Jarry was the best option when it happened. Remember that they were also determined to add Karlsson that summer too, and they weren't going to go into that season with a Nedjelkovic/completely untested Blomqvist tandem. They were taking a big swing at making a playoff run.

That said, I would have offered Jarry either a substantial raise or term, not both. If he had gotten a 2-year deal at $5-6 million, it wouldn't be as big a deal this season. They could have bought him out over the summer, might be able trade him with some retention, or just wait it out and let him walk next summer. Or if he had kept the same salary (I think it was $3.25 million) and had a 5-year deal, things wouldn't be great, but it'd still be easier to find a taker in a trade at that price, again with some possible retention.
Hindsight, yeah. For Blomqvist (a bit), Murashov (yeah), Larsson (eh, sure), Gauthier (yeah).

Not for Jarry. I called it at the time. Did not want him on the roster. At 1M, maybe. At a real stretch, at the same AAV for a short term deal. That part isn't hindsight.

This team could have gone out and money-balled a few goaltenders. There are enough budget bin goaltenders around usually to take a chance on. Larsson was an example this off-season, but they're always kinda there. You could get a few on the cheap and let them compete for back up duty. Blomqvist can be in the conversation if he does well in the A.

Jarry at 5.375Mx5 was awful at the time and it's not gotten any better. I actually like Graves' contract better by a fair amount.

The problem with Jarry is that you're getting a high ceiling, no floor kind of goalie. That's nice, but wouldn't outperform someone like Ned by any significant margin on average and fall significantly below that for stretches. You might as well have the cap space assigned somewhere else at that stage.
SteelCityFan
ECHL'er
ECHL'er
Posts: 2,169
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:03 am

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by SteelCityFan »

Pens4Life wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2024 9:02 pm
None of the scenarios with him are good.. but sometimes you have to take some bad with the good..

Maybe Jarry with 25% retained (4M approx. left) and 2nd rounder goes for another underperforming guy and 3rd rounder..

Which team could need him? Even JR and Vancouver probably wouldnt bite that sour apple atm.
I think this is a good approach. Jarry is broken mentally. Unfortunately, I don’t think it matters who’s in net as long as Sully and his outdated system are still behind the bench.
Pens4Life
AHL All-Star
AHL All-Star
Posts: 5,416
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Fire Sullivan

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Pens4Life »

Defense is huge problem with Pens, soo many mistakes, bad passes, bad coverages, bad positioning.. it seems even worse now with Quinn here! They look confused and lost.. every goalie will suffer with that 6-7 guys in front of him
Puck-Lurker
AHL Hall of Famer
AHL Hall of Famer
Posts: 7,525
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:49 am
Location: Fire Sullivan.

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Puck-Lurker »

Pens4Life wrote: Sat Oct 19, 2024 4:31 am
Defense is huge problem with Pens, soo many mistakes, bad passes, bad coverages, bad positioning.. it seems even worse now with Quinn here! They look confused and lost.. every goalie will suffer with that 6-7 guys in front of him
I think that's what worried me the absolute most to start the season. Dubas did a ton of work to overhaul the bottom six and improved the goalie situation.

Defense.. we signed Grzelcyk to play top pair minutes and... *crickets chirping*

I get it, defense doesn't put asses in seats, but we're really soft at back. I don't mean that in a physicality way. If the emphasis was to be to reach the playoffs, more than bringing in assets for the future, that should've been addressed. Even at the cost of passing up on one of these picking up some misfits with picks attached types of deals.


Whenever this team has to transition to defense, there's just that fraction of extra time lost. Combine it with some misreads and this defense gets beaten a lot.
KG
NHL Third Liner
NHL Third Liner
Posts: 25,951
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:53 am
Location: NY

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by KG »

According to Freidman the Avs are looking at Gibson and Blackwood as potential goalie options. Hopefully KD is doing his due diligence.
Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 13,300
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 12:04 am

Re: The Jarry Problem

Post by Admin »

Ned recalled from WBS.